Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
4 pages/≈1100 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
History
Type:
Research Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 17.28
Topic:

Accidental Statesman History Research Paper Essay Coursework

Research Paper Instructions:

Please use the attached outline to create this research paper requirement. I have also attached the document to use for referencing the research paper. Please use Times New Roman 12 point font. And APA format 7th Edition.


 


 


 


 


 


 


Accidental Statesman Mission Command (Describe)


 


SFC David J. Minder


Master Leader Course 107-20


 


 


 


This paper is based on a topic within each case study. You are to write on the topic as it relates to your assigned case study.


 


 


Accidental Statesman Mission Command (Describe)


                                                                     


Introduction Paragraph:


Following the March 2003 invasion of Iraq and Saddam Hussein's government disintegrating, Maj. Gen. David Petraeus, who commanded the 101st Airborne Division, needed to control the city of Mosul. After the combat mission, the 101st took control of Mosul in Nineveh province to ensure stability. There was a focus on reconstruction and governance at a time when Mosul lacked political authority. Maj. Gen. David Petraeus provided clarity on who needed to execute the stability operations.  


Thesis (Your claim): In the absence of an effective government in mission command, the military plays a crucial role in stability operations. Effective execution and implementation of mission command requires teamwork and is necessary for rebuilding and guaranteeing security for the people.


 


Body (Topic development):


Supporting Topic 1: Team spirit is necessary for the planning and execution of the command mission, and there are cooperative team tasks.


            Supporting Idea 1: Supporting team work and clarifying what was expected in the command-centric military culture is necessary to achieve the mission objective since teams are interdependent.


            Supporting Idea 2: Teamwork builds trust, and teams allow the command leaders to accomplish their missions and build cohesiveness to achieve the same goals (King, 2017).


            Supporting Idea 3: In Mosul, the mission took place in a violent and highly complex environment. The teams worked intentionally and cooperated to ensure successful performance as there were interdependent tasks, along with the need to rebuild (Lundberg, 2006).


 


Supporting Topic 2: The reconstruction required by the mission commanders highlights the need for nation-building skills beyond the mission command.


            Supporting Idea 1: The mission's mandate required modification to support the reconstruction efforts, and MG Petraeus used his nation-building skills, based on his previous experience, to support rebuilding efforts.


            Supporting Idea 2: Commitment beyond the military operations was possible because there was support for nation-building from the top military leadership.


            Supporting Idea 3: The mission command handled nation-building; military leadership focused on easing conflict and violence as there was expertise beyond war-fighting. MG Petraeus allowed some Baathists from the fallen Saddam Hussein regime to work in nation-building as they had the necessary skill set (Lundberg, 2006).


 


Supporting Topic 3: Probing the complex situation helped establish security and obtain solutions beyond the warfare actions, but enduring wars make state-building difficult (Sullivan, 2016).


            Supporting Idea 1: The priority of enhancing the security of the Iraqis, based on the commander's intentional stance, supported the well-being of the people without affecting the combat mission.  


Supporting Idea 2: Analysis of the US post-intervention scenario showed considerations to the local and regional security.


            Supporting Idea 3: Continued support for the troops extended beyond combat while leading and managing changes ensured the success of the security operations. The commander of the airborne divisions continued evaluating whether the actions and decisions were morally permissible during and after the combat mission.


 


Conclusion:


            MG Petraeus focused on taking Mosul, liberating the city after the 2003 US invasion. The success and effectiveness of the mission command linked closely to the team efforts, the rebuilding efforts, and the focus of improving the security and well-being of the Iraqi people. In the future, nation-building efforts must take priority when considering the combat mission. The US carried out combat missions in Iraq, but MG Petraeus faced the challenge of implementing successful next-steps because of the swift takeover of Mosul. The rebuilding efforts required reevaluating the military strategy through the emphasis on restoration and improving long-term security. 


 


 


References


King, A. C. (2017). Mission command 2.0: From an individualist to a collectivist model. Parameters, 47(1), 7-19.


Lundberg, K. (2006). The Accidental Statesman: General Petraeus and the City of Mosul, Iraq Case Study (Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Case Program: 2006).


Sullivan, C. J. (2016). State-building: America's foreign policy challenge. Parameters, 46(1), 51-65.

Research Paper Sample Content Preview:

Accidental Statesman Mission Command (Describe)
SFC David J. Minder
Master Leader Course 107-20
This paper is based on a topic within each case study.You are to write on the topic as it relates to your assigned case study.
Introduction
Major General David Petraeus, commander of the 101st Airborne Division in Mosul, in Iraq’s Nineveh province after the US led invasion in March 2003 invasion. Inside Mosul, Iraq’s third largest city, there was a need to ensure stability and plan beyond combat mission to include reconstruction and rebuilding. The fall of Saddam Hussein's government had affected country’s goverance and there were different actors who were seeking to control Mosul, and yet Petraeus was faced with the task of ensuring stability. The presence of mission command in the city without an effective government was necessary to improve stability. The success of mission command is closely linked with the ability to facilitate effective teamwork, where there are rebuilding efforts and focus on improving and guaranteeing the security of the people.
Cooperation in team tasks
In command missions there is teamwork and teams help to ensure the effectiveness of the missions where the embers share the same goal and there is cooperation. Building cohesive teams is critical to the success of mission command where there is clarity on roles and what to expect. Leaders focus on achieving the mission objective where the members are capable of operating in the adverse places and overcoming any obstacles. The teams tend to be interdependent and the commanders play a more active role in building successful teams. Petraeus realized that there was a need to ensure that the combat mission was well understood by the team members beyond.
In command missions, team-building activities help builds trust and especially when there is team cohesiveness. The command team leader such as Petraeus encountered complex operations, and the success of such missions requires professionalized teamwork between the commanders (King, 2017). Mission command and leadership are closely intertwined and the leaders play a crucial role in planning command mission where they foster team work to facilitate the success of the command missions. The combat mission teams support and protect missions based on the direction of the combat leaders such as Petraeus.
There are various actors in Mosul, and there was a need for there to cohesive teams as the
US military had to act and rebuild Iraq since there was no effective government in Mosul. Teams tend to cooperate working on interdependent tasks and the success of the missions is closely linked with providing performance feedback (Lundberg, 2006). Mosul was in a violent and complex situation environment. Supporting cohesive teamwork is important to improve performance in combat missions, restoration efforts and nation building.
Nation-building and mission command
The mission commanders focused on the need for rebuilding and reconstruction of strategic outcomes in the mission command. The transition efforts also focus on the stabilization and reconstruction operations. Even as the US policy highlighted that there was legitimate use of force, Mosul and Iraq in generated presented cha...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Research Paper Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now