Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
8 pages/≈2200 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Research Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 41.47
Topic:

Clinical Problem Proposal Paper Part II: Annotated Bibliography

Research Paper Instructions:

Hello, I will upload the instructions for part 2 including the grading template to insure that everything is covered., the exemplar, part 1 correction and comments from the professor. The literature table that needs to be complete and the exemplar for the literature table.
N.B whichever research articles you will be using, you will need to upload the pdf with the research paper project. See uploaded instructions. Thanks


 


Clinical Problem Proposal Paper Part II: Annotated Bibliography-Literature Table


  - Instructions, Grading Template, and Rubric


 


Instructions


Please use your Literature Table as a guide to develop Part II of your Clinical Problem Project.


Part II section - page length 3 ½ - 4 ½ pages (consider 3/4 page for EACH ARTICLE = 3 ½ to 4 ½  pages – PLUS: Literature Table, Part I, APA title page and references).


 -Written in 3rd person –


Please see Clinical Problem Project Exemplar.


 


I. CONTENT                                                                                                                    



  • Part I Revisions


– Part I feedback addressed (headings and format as per PART I)


 



  • Confirmed PICO (Use heading: PICO) –


-PICO feedback addressed


-PICO Appropriately formatted –Refer to your text – (Polit & Beck, 2018, Chapter 2)


-Identify PICO components as appropriate (P) (I) (C) (O).                                                                            


-PICO addresses problem – aims to generate solutions.                                                                           -Note: Part I ends with PICO and Part II [and forward] after instructor feedback includes the revised/confirmed PICO



  • Literature Search Method (Use heading: Method) –1 paragraph-see Method Template/Exemplar


- include search engines, key words, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and yield


Method TEMPLATE: (Method [the steps] used to search the literature)                                                                                      A literature search was conducted using the databases ____,___, and ____ (i.e. CINAHL, Medline, and PubMed). Keywords were ____, ___, ___, _______, and ________. Inclusion criteria were ____. Articles were excluded if were ______ (how did you narrow to the articles chosen for review -i.e. excluded duplicate articles, lower levels of evidence, or populations not pertaining to the topic). Four articles were reviewed, (list types of studies - i.e one systematic review, one randomized controlled trial, and two cohort studies [cite articles]). See exemplar below.


 



  • Annotated Bibliography (Use heading: Annotated Bibliography) – FOUR ARTICLES - 3/4 -1 page per article


-Four Peer-Reviewed RESEARCH STUDIES (Quantitative or Qualitative)


      -Attach PDF (not link) of each article in your annotated bibliography


      -Articles MUST answer your PICO


- include authors, title, purpose, research question if included, method/design, Level of Evidence (LOE), population, sample, setting, data collection, findings (STATS or qualitative themes), limitations


 



  • Literature Table (Use heading: Literature Table)


- include authors, title, purpose, research question if included, method/design, Level of Evidence (LOE), population, sample, setting, data collection, findings (STATS or qualitative themes), limitations


 


II. REFERENCE LIST                                                                            



  • Relevance of references


 


III. FORMAT                                                                                                        



  • APA Style

  • Mechanics (grammar, punctuation, sentence structure, etc.)



  • Organization of ideas (transition of paragraphs; use of headings)  


NOTE:



  • Paper Format: APA including title page, citations and references. 

  • Title must reflect your topic (not the name of the assignment)

  • Please proofread for spelling and punctuation errors.  Read aloud to someone else, or have someone read the paper back to you to review for grammatical errors and/or sentence structure. 



  • Paper should not exceed suggested page length. (excluding Title and Reference pages).



  •  Students should retain a copy of their paper.

  • Papers will not be reviewed for corrections prior to grading by faculty. Please contact the Student Support writing lab for technical and scholarly writing assistance.


 


Please see the Grading Template & Scholarly Paper Rubric BELOW


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 



Clinical Problem Project PART II: Annotated Bibliography-Literature Table Grading Template


 



Criteria



Potential


Points



Earned


Points



Comments



Content



 



 



 



Revision PART I



 



 



 



Topic/ Stats Statement - prevalence, percentages, and/or rates      



5



 



Not submitted – unable to earn points



Significance -supported with stats



5



 



Not submitted – unable to earn points



Purpose – moves forward explores solutions to problem- nursing focused



5



 



Not submitted – unable to earn points



PICO



 



 



 



       Feedback addressed, mirrors purpose appropriate format,                    clearly identified (P)(I)(C)(O),



5



 



Please see my comments Among stoke patients (P), how effective is using Vitamin D supplement as an Adjunct Therapy with anticoagulants (I) on management of stroke (O)?



Method



 



 



 



       Includes search engines, key word, inclusion/exclusion criteria & number of article reviewed (follows template)



5



 



See comments in canvas



Annotated Bibliography



 



 



 



   Must Attach PDF (NOT Link) of each article in annotated bibliography


 – Submissions without PDFs will be considered INCOMPLETE and RETURNED with a ZERO


 – Opportunity to resubmit project with PDFs by assigned due date and graded at 75%.



 



 



 



       Four Peer-Reviewed RESEARCH STUDIES(Quantitative or Qualitative)



10



 



ONLY abstracts presented



       Articles – clearly answers  PICO- explores solutions



10



 



Articles do not address PICO – Note: a quick search revealed


several studies conducted evaluating Vit D and Stroke  



Clearly identifies authors, title, purpose, research question if included,       method/design, Level of Evidence (LOE), population, sample, setting, data collection, findings (STATS or qualitative themes), limitations



80



 



Only information from abstracts -  



Literature Table



 



 



 



Attach – includes authors, title, purpose, research question if included,       method/design, Level of Evidence (LOE), population, sample, setting, data collection, findings (STATS or qualitative themes), limitations



40



 



Numerous errors – please see comments in canvas



Citation / References



 



 



 



Resources



5



 



References Not submitted – unable to earn points



Format



 



 



 



APA style



10



 



Title page



Mechanics (written in 3rd person, grammar, sentence structure, punctuation)



10



 



 



Organization of ideas and paper flow


 (Transitions thought process in logical manner, headings, page limit)



10



 



Literature table difficult to follow



Total Score


 



200 pts



 



 



 



 


 


Please see Scholarly Paper Rubric Below


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Grading Rubric for Scholarly Paper


 



Components 


 


 



Level of Achievement 



Poor


< 70% of points



Fair


70-80% of points



Good


80-90% of points



Excellent


90-100% of points



Conceptualization



Does not show learning;


Demonstrates weak understanding of concepts



Fair presentation of concepts; minimal use of terminology and/or models from program courses



Integrated concepts or practices; use of terminology and/or models from program courses



Integrating concepts in original and innovative way; clear use of terminology and/or models from program courses



Content &Vocabulary



Inaccurate information; main content missing


 



 


Insufficient content or explanation



 


Good explanation of concepts



Fluency, sequencing & appropriateness of terms & concepts; higher level, scholarly vocabulary



Organization



Unclear overview, few organizational cues, disorganized 



Fair overview with few cues (subheadings); unclear transitions and sequencing 



Clear statements, well organized, subheadings, good transitions and sequencing 



Clear statements, examples, sequencing, assignment subheadings, logical; transition of paragraphs by thought and topic 



Writing Mechanics



Several errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and/or sentence structure shows carelessness



Fair spelling and grammar; some typographical errors



Sentence structure, grammar, and punctuation are good; some minor spelling errors; few or no grammatical errors



 Excellent sentence structure, grammar, and punctuation; no spelling errors;  errors and excellent sentence structure and fluency



Resources



No resources cited/referenced



Personal communication predominant; citations not reliable sources; cited research from secondary source



Use of peer reviewed and credible sources, easily accessible references, 4 or less sources



Predominance of sound authorities, peer reviewed, recent journals, in-text citations match references, good citations and 4+ sources



APA Style



Not in APA style



APA style, but several errors in cover page content, page enumeration, format (margins & indentation), headers, citation & reference format



APA style with few errors



APA without error



Adapted from Swenson, DX, The College of St. Scholastica in Duluth MN at http://faculty.css.edu/dswenson/web/Gradingrubrics/rubrictermpaper.html


 (Revised RAR 5-18-19)


 


 


 

Words Characters Reading time 
Research Paper Sample Content Preview:

Name:
Instructor:
Institution:
Date:
Part II
Method
A literature search was conducted using Annals of internal medicine, Clinical Nursing Studies, and Frontiers in public health. The keywords were bed alarms, falls, elderly patients, and prevention. Inclusion criteria were full-text, peer-reviewed articles, English, published 2012-2019, and prevention of falls in elderly patients. Exclusion criteria were animal studies, duplicate studies, and studies not focused on the topic. Four articles were reviewed; one systematic review, two non-experimental cohort study, and one randomized controlled trial (Mileski, M, Brooks, M., Topinka, J. B, Hamilton, G., Land, C, Mitchell, T, & McClay, R. 2019; Subermaniam, K, Welfred, R., Subramanian, P, Chinna, K, Ibrahim, F, Mohktar, M. S, & Tan, M. P. 2017; Ward-Smith, P., Barrett, L., Rayson, K., & Govro, K, 2014; Shorr, R. I., Chandler, A. M., Mion, L. C., Waters, T. M., Liu, M., Daniels, M. J., ... & Miller, S. T. 2012)
Annotated bibliography
1. Mileski, M., Brooks, M., Topinka, J. B., Hamilton, G., Land, C., Mitchell, T., ... & McClay, R. (2019, March). Alarming and/or alerting device effectiveness in reducing falls in long-term care (LTC) facilities? A systematic review. In Healthcare (Vol. 7, No. 1, p. 51). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
Mileski, M., Brooks, M., Topinka, J. B., Hamilton, G., Land, C., Mitchell, T. & McClay, R. (2019) conducted a quality improvement research that involved 561 elderly patients. The purpose of the study was to review alarming and alerting devices and their potential effectiveness in reducing falls in LTC facilities. The study was qualitative and involved the systematic review of peer-reviewed articles found in indexed databases. The inclusion criteria of the peer-reviewed articles was based on English language, whether they appeared in medical journals or published by universities and colleges. Additionally, articles were only incorporated into the study if it was deemed germane by all authors.
The study applied the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure that results were consistent. The researchers reported that alarms and alerting devices reduce falls although 5 out of 61 (8.2%) facilitators stated that alarm systems are expensive to install. In 6 out of 57 (10.5%) occurrences, elderly patients who fear falling indicated that the use of alarms provides peace of mind. However, 37.70% of the facilitators indicated that alarms are worthless if they are used as stand-alone interventions while 3.5% stated that the effectiveness of the alarms depends on proper installation. The major limitation of the study is that the researchers did not access the actual data that was used in the 561 articles.
2. Subermaniam, K., Welfred, R., Subramanian, P., Chinna, K., Ibrahim, F., Mohktar, M. S., & Tan, M. P. (2017). The effectiveness of a wireless modular bed absence sensor device for fall prevention among older inpatients. Frontiers in public health, 4, 292.
Subermaniam, K., Welfred, R., Subramanian, P., Chinna, K., Ibrahim, F., Mohktar, M. S., & Tan, M. P. (2017) conducted a quality improvement project in an acute geriatric ward at a large teaching hospital ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to art essays:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!