Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
3 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Research Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 11.66
Topic:

A Brief Explanation of the Ethics of Research

Research Paper Instructions:

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies


Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?


When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.


Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.


Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?


In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.


To Prepare:



  • Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course. 

  • Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.

  • Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.

  • Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.


Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies


After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:



  • The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.

  • A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.

  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.

  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.

  • A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.


By Day 7 of Week 3


Submit your Evidence-Based Project.


 



Research Paper Sample Content Preview:
 


A Brief Explanation of the Ethics of Research


Why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interestDescription of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed articleDescription of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specificDescription of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selectedRhudy, L. M., Johnson, M. R., Krecke, C. A., Keigley, D. S., Schnell, S. J., Maxson, P. M., ... & Warfield, K. T. (2019). Change‐of‐Shift Nursing Handoff Interruptions: Implications for Evidence‐Based Practice. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 16(5), 362-370. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12390.
The choice of this article arises from its exploration of nurses’ perception of the interruptions that occurs during handoffs. This article is fundamental because it highlights how nurses value the information between peers. It also involves communication ethics during the research. Rhudy et al. (2019) aimed to assess nurses’ perceptions about the interruptions they encounter during shift changes at the bedside of critical care patients. It also determines these disruptions’ type, number, and source. Rudy and colleagues employed an exploratory descriptive research design in this study. This approach is qualitative because it draws data from observation and focus group discussion. As a result, it agrees with qualitative technique protocols. The study draws its strength from using first-hand information from the healthcare providers in forming the nursing issue of interest - nurse-to-nurse shift change while using the qualitative approach. The researchers also went further to ensure coding replication through simultaneous recording and cross-checking of observation, leading to reliability and validity of the data.
Ernst, K. M., McComb, S. A., & Ley, C. (2018). Nurse‐to‐nurse shift handoffs on medical-surgical units: A process within the flow of nursing care. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(5-6), e1189-e1201.  HYPERLINK "https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14254." https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14254.I chose this article because it approaches the handover issue from a comparative perspective. The article investigates which option is ideal and the existing deviations. It also further assesses the effects it introduces in providing quality services by the nurses. The only ethical issues were ensuring the research did not compromise patient information.The research by Ernst et al. (2018) aimed to qualitatively examine the process of medical-surgical nurse handover in their routine practice. It focused on identifying which handoff is ideal and whether the process was consistent with the ideal one. This aspect would assist the researchers in determining the impact on overall care. The study used focus group discussions to collect data. The approach is qualitative becaus...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to ethics essays:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!