Reaction Paper (Law Reaction Paper)
1. Something that surprised you, that you found interesting in the material. Why did
it surprise or interest you? If nothing surprised or interested you, what should the
authors have done to improve their paper in order to appeal to you?
2. Whether or not you were persuaded by the argument, theory, and evidence in the
readings and why - the flaws in the methods, the most/least compelling arguments
and interpretations (and why they were the most/least compelling arguments and
interpretations), obvious oversights, connections to other readings you’ve done in
the past, etc. For any flaws or issues with the readings you mention, provide
solutions for how the researcher could have done it better.
3. Present ideas for additional studies that might be run which expand on the
authors’ ideas.
Student’s Name:
Institutional Affiliation:
Course:
Instructor:
Date:
Reaction Paper
I found the author's different heuristics that citizens employ during the decision-making process in politics quite interesting. Individual voters would not make decisions on candidates without assuming matters "by default." I am astonished that such voters do not realize how biased that might be. Aside from this category of voters, some voters rely on endorsements. I agree that there might be potential biases or errors when the approvals contradict the expectations of the voters or when there is uncertainty about the endorsed candidate. However, it is surprising that a candidate's appearance is also a determinant of political heuristics (Lau & Redlawsk, 2001). It never occurred that voters would take keenness on a candidate's image or that it would be a pathway to finding other information like race or likability. I wonder how these images could trigger emotions that mi...
π Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Reaction Paper Samples:
- Reaction Paper Assignment on Gangs and Predatory Crimes1 page/β275 words | 3 Sources | APA | Law | Reaction Paper |
- The Classical and the Positivist Schools of Thought2 pages/β550 words | 1 Source | APA | Law | Reaction Paper |
- Written Assignment 4: Labeling and Conflict Theory2 pages/β550 words | 1 Source | APA | Law | Reaction Paper |
- Critical and Feminist Theories: Criminology Research2 pages/β550 words | 1 Source | APA | Law | Reaction Paper |
- The Contemporary Society: Speech Wars Among Women 6 pages/β1650 words | 2 Sources | APA | Law | Reaction Paper |
- Criminal Courtroom Observation Reaction Assignment 4 pages/β1100 words | 8 Sources | APA | Law | Reaction Paper |
- Business and Human Rights: Interview with John Ruggie3 pages/β825 words | No Sources | APA | Law | Reaction Paper |