Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
1 page/≈275 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
MLA
Subject:
Mathematics & Economics
Type:
Other (Not Listed)
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 4.32
Topic:

Calculating and Interpreting Operating Profitability Ratios Case Study

Other (Not Listed) Instructions:

Calculating and Interpreting Operating Profitability Ratios Case Study


Calculating and Interpreting Operating Profitability Ratios
Case Study


Champion International Corporation and Kimberly Clark Company are forest products companies. Champion derives the majority of its revenues from the sale of printing  paper and newsprint for a variety of business and publishing needs. Kimberly derives the majority of its revenues from the sale of tissues, diapers, and other personal care products. Champion derives 85% of its revenues from sales within the US. Kimberly derives 67% of its revenues from sales within the US. Data for the two companies follows below:


         (in millions)                                 Year 3       Year 4       Year 5


Champion


Sales                                                       $5,318      $6,972      $5,880


Average Accounts Receivable                  $   528      $   610      $   839


Change in Sales from previous Year+ 4.9%     + 31.1%    - 15.7%


Kimberly Clark


Sales                                                       $11,628   $13,373   $13,149


Average Accounts Receivable                   $  1,385    $ 1,573   $ 1,669     


Change in Sales from previous Year+ 2.9%     + 15%       - 1.7%


Required:



  1. Calculate the accounts receivable turnover ratios for Champion and Kimberly for Years 3, 4 and 5.

  2. Suggest possible scenarios for the differences in the accounts receivable turnovers for the two firms during the three year period.


Eli Lilly and Merck develop, manufacture, and market prescription drugs worldwide. Merck also provides managed prescription drug programs for various businesses, purchasing drugs in bulk quantities for distribution to health care providers. Lilly derives 56% of its revenues from sales within the US while Merck derives only 30%. Both firms use the same cost flow assumptions for inventories and cost of goods sold.


Required:



  1. Calculate the inventory turnover ratio for each firm for Year 5, 6 and 7

  2. Suggest reasons for the differences in the inventory ratios of the two firms.

  3. Suggest reasons for the changes in the inventory turnover ratios of the two firms during the 3 year period.


                                                             Year 5         Year 6         Year 7


Eli Lilly


Cost of Goods Sold                        $1,680       $1,836       $2,118


Average Inventories                      $1,036       $  904        $  861


Change in Sales from previous Year+ 9.9%    +18.4%      + 8.6%


Merck


Cost of Goods Sold                        $5,962       $7,456       $9,319


Average Inventories                      $1,651       $1,767       $2,011


Change in Sales from previous Year+14.7%   +11.4%      + 18.9%


 


Other (Not Listed) Sample Content Preview:
Calculating and Interpreting Operating Profitability RatiosQuestion 1
Solution (a)
Account Receivable Turnover Ratio =Net Credit SalesAverage Account Receivable


Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Champion

Sales

$5,318.00

$6,972.00

$5,880.00


Average Account Receivable

$528.00

$610.00

$839.00


A/c Receivable turnover ratio

10.07

11.43

7.01

Kimberly

Sales

$11,628.00

$13,373.00

$13,149.00


Average Account Receivable

$1,385.00

$1,573.00

$1,669.00


A/c Receivable turnover ratio

8.40

8.50

7.88

Solution (b)
Generally, Champion International Corporation (CIC) had a higher account receivable turnover ratio than Kimberly Clark Company (KCC) in years three and four, except for year five when KCC registered a higher account receivable turnover ratio of 7.88 times compared to CIC’s 7.01 times.
Three possible scenarios might have led to this. First, in years three and four, CIC had a relatively higher number of quality customers that pay their debt than KCC. Moreover, CIC’s collection of accounts receivable was more efficient in years three and four than that of KCC. Secondly, in the first two years, CIC could have had a more conservative credit policy that KCC that allowed it to avoid credit extension to customers. Lastly, KCC must have had a poor credit policy in ye...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These MLA Other (Not Listed) Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!