Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
3 pages/β‰ˆ825 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Management
Type:
Other (Not Listed)
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 12.96
Topic:

M-SLP3- Group & Teamwork Management Other (Not Listed)

Other (Not Listed) Instructions:

Make a journal entries about applying the background material to your workplace environment.
In this SLP assignment, the focus is on your work in groups or teams. For this module, your journal entries should focus on questions suggested by the background material on groups and teams:
For example:
What barriers to team effectiveness are there for teams in which you are a member?
In what stage of group development is a particular team of which you are a member and why?
How does decision making function within a team in which you are a member?
As in the previous modules’ SLP assignments, each of your journal entries should be at least one half page in length and you should make 5 journal entries over the course of the module—all entries made on different days. Provide a heading to each entry.
Also, as in the previous SLP assignments, before you submit your journal entries, review what you have written, and add in-text citations from the background material as appropriate. Also include a reference page at the end of your paper that gives the references that correspond to the in-text citations that you have used. For completeness, don’t forget to add a title page.
Note: A URL (website address) is NOT a reference. A reference always contains four parts: author, publication date, article title, and the source of the article. Sometimes there is no author, but the APA manual tells you what you can put in that spot instead. The source for a high-quality peer-reviewed journal article is the journal!
Required Reading
Alanis Business Academy. (2014, March 10). Tuckman’s stages of team development [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www(dot)youtube(dot)com/watch?v=OhSI6oBQmQA. Standard YouTube License. Permission to use video received 8/12/19 from Alanis Business Academy.
National Conference of States Legislatures (NCSL). (2017). Tips for making effective PowerPoint presentations. Retrieved from http://www(dot)ncsl(dot)org/legislators-staff/legislative-staff/legislative-staff-coordinating-committee/tips-for-making-effective-powerpoint-presentations.aspx
Organizational behavior. (2017). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing Edition. Retrieved from http://open(dot)lib(dot)umn(dot)edu/organizationalbehavior/. CC BY-NC-SA License.
Read the following sections in Chapter 9:
Section 9.2 Group Dynamics
Section 9.3 Understanding Team Design Characteristics
Section 9.4 Management of Teams
Section 9.5 Barriers to Effective Teams
Read the following sections in Chapter 10:
Section 10.2 Understanding Conflict
Section 10.3 Causes and Outcomes of Conflict
Section 10.4 Conflict Management
Read the following section in Chapter 11:
Section 11.4 Decision Making in Groups

Other (Not Listed) Sample Content Preview:

Group and Teamwork
Student’s Name
Institution
Group and Teamwork
Journal Entry 1
In what stage of group development is a particular team of which you are a member and why?
The team I am in is in the storming stage. The team was recently formed and we have not yet decided on many things including meeting times, individual roles, and norms. While we know each other, we have not really moved forward in regards to attaining group objectives. I know we are in the storming stage because of the conflicts we are experiencing. As described by Alanis Business Academy (2014), the storming stage is characterized by conflicts and disagreements among team members. I understand this is a normal phase in team development and I believe the next time we are meeting we will move towards the end of this chaotic stage. I think having disagreements among team members at the early stages is necessary for finding a direction that is acceptable to all or the majority of members.
Journal Entry 2
Think about the most cohesive group you have ever been in. How did it compare in terms of similarity, stability, size, support, and satisfaction?
I have once been a cohesive workplace team whose primary task was to develop a training program for the members of our workplace. I would say that the team exhibited a high level of cohesiveness as every member was committed to attaining the team objective. In terms of similarity, other than sex, we shared other characteristics such as skills, education, age, and values. As informed by the book Organizational Behavior (2017), when group members share these aspects, they are more likely to form a cohesive team. The team was also stable given that we carried the project over a course of 8 weeks. Size affects the cohesiveness of a team (Organizational Behavior, 2017). There were five of us in the team, and I think this contributed to the cohesiveness. Support and satisfaction levels were also high because the leader put effort into ensuring that members feel comfortable and are free to ask for assistance whenever they need it.
Journal Entry 3
Why do you think social loafing occurs within groups?
While personally I have not social loafed, I have been in groups where some members engaged in social loafing. Although one can feel the sense of unfairness in such an instance, I think it is the nature of some people to joyride, more so groups comprised of many members. Therefore, I think social loafing occurs within groups because of the lack of individual reward or blame. In the group setting, if the team successfully completes a project, all members are likely to be congratulated regardless of their individual input into the group. Alternatively, in the case the group fail...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Other (Not Listed) Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!