Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
3 pages/β‰ˆ825 words
Sources:
3 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Law
Type:
Other (Not Listed)
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 12.96
Topic:

Bill of Rights and Ratification of the US Constitution

Other (Not Listed) Instructions:

Assignment Content
Imagine it is 1787. Like many people living in the United States, you hold strong beliefs about the ratification of the proposed U.S. Constitution and have concerns about how this proposed government will affect your community. Being a civic-minded citizen, you have decided to distribute information about the proposed U.S. Constitution much like the Founders wrote the Federalist Papers to encourage the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.
Create an informational pamphlet or brochure to help the people in your community decide whether to oppose or support ratification.
Your pamphlet or brochure in a minimum of 800 words should include:
Differentiate between the Federalist/Anti-Federalist positions on whether or not to ratify the new U.S. Constitution.
Identify two concerns about government structure and where power resided that each side deemed important.
Explain why the Federalists did not want the U.S. Bill of Rights, but the Anti-Federalists did and would not ratify the new U.S. Constitution without it.
Defend your viewpoints on the issues. Which side do you agree with? Which side has been proven right?
Include a minimum of three references formatted to APA 7 guidelines and use in-text citations for all of your facts.
Choose Submission Format - select one
Brochure/pamphlet template in Microsoft Word
Microsoft Sway (you will need to download a document to submit)
You may also write an 800-word essay instead of creating a brochure following the same outline, formatted to APA 7 essay guidelines.
MECHANICS
Incorporate facts from this week’s materials into your response, and use the resources provided in the Learning Activities folder and in your instructor's discussion posts.
Include in-text citations and a reference list with a minimum of three sources in APA 7 format to support your assignment. Do not use Wikipedia, Quora, Yahoo Questions, or other crowdsourced websites as references. You may use the formatted references provided for the materials in the Learning Activities folder and in your instructor's discussion posts.
Do not rely on direct quotes/copying passages wholesale from your sources; no more than 15% of your assignment can be direct quotes - this means put concepts/ideas into your own words to show that you understand them.
Format your assignment according to APA 7 guidelines.

Other (Not Listed) Sample Content Preview:

Bill of Rights and Ratification of the US Constitution
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Name and Number
Lecturer’s Name
Due Date
Bill of Rights and Ratification of the US Constitution
The Constitution is one of the most powerful documents in the history of the United States. It outlines the government and details the rights of the citizens. Before the ratification of the Constitution, the US relied on the Articles of Confederation. However, the weaknesses of the Articles necessitated the new Constitution, which experienced challenges following a heated debate between the Federalists and anti-federalists.
Federalist and Anti-Federalist Position on Ratification of the US Constitution
The Federalists supported the ratification of the American Constitution and the development of a strong federal government with a more powerful executive, greater congressional powers, and an independent judiciary (Gatica, 2019). They believed a stronger federal government with central powers would unite individual states and create a stronger nation. In contrast, anti-federalists opposed the ratification, maintaining that the states, not the federal government, should concentrate power. According to them, a central government would threaten the sovereignty of the states. However, federalists argued that the Constitution supported the principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism, making it impossible to compromise the sovereignty of states (Dry, 2000). Anti-federalists were also worried that a more robust national government would be vulnerable to tyranny since the new Constitution did not include the bill of rights (Storing, 2008). Many citizens would be at risk of oppression without a bill of rights. In their defense regarding the bill of rights, the federalists claimed that this addition was unnecessary because the Constitution only limited the government, not the people.
Concerns about Government Structure
One concern about government structure was the possibility of absolute power in the central government. Anti-federalists argued against expanding national power as it would create a dictatorial regime bearing in mind that the Constitution did not include the bill of rights. According to anti-federalists, expanding the national power would extend the powers of the executive (Storing, 2008). Over time, the presidency would become monarchical. Therefore, they feared a strong federal government would become more powerful and abusive. Another concern is that the Constitution would create a form of an aristocracy. Although federalists argued that the new government supported the principles of separation of powers, anti-federalists feared that a corrupt senate, judiciary, and executive would conspire to form an aristocracy (Storing, 2008). This means that a small privileged c...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Other (Not Listed) Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now