Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
5 pages/β‰ˆ1375 words
Sources:
10 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Other (Not Listed)
Language:
English (U.K.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 24.3
Topic:

Report on Plan to Implement Evidence into Practice

Other (Not Listed) Instructions:

REPORT ON PLAN TO IMPLEMENT EVIDENCE INTO PRACTICE .
A plan for the implementation of change in healthcare practice based on IMPLEMENTATION OF A RAPID RESPONSE TEAM. 
THE PLAN WILL HAVE five main sections each approximately 300 words.
A reference list must also be included. 
a. Evidence of the following: 
1. INTRODUCTION, including: a) Overall statement of purpose b) Background situation statement outlining evidence supporting the change you wish to implement c) At least one clear, specific objective d) A list of the target audience/s i.e. Physicians, Nurses, Policy makers, allied health staff etc.
2. GAP ANALYSIS that includes: a) Evidence based demonstration of differences between current (no rapid response team)and proposed practices b) Discussion of key messages and/or recommendations arising from evidence justifying practice change 
3. BARRIER ANALYSIS that includes: a) Identification of probable barriers and/or how they will be identified b) Discussion of barriers that need to be addressed to enable success of implementation. 
4. Reference to CHANGE THEORY/S including: a) Outline of the chosen change theory/s including your implementation process/model/cycle. b) Definition of key constructs of each theory/process/model cycle c) Justification for choice of each theory/process/model cycle: i. suitability to context ii. evidence of prior use and effectiveness 
5. EXAMPLE IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY, specifically: a) Example educational material or survey/questionnaire designed to do ONE of: i. Informing the plan (eg a survey to inform the gap analysis and/or barrier analysis); OR ii. Implementing the plan (eg education material); OR iii. Audit its progress (eg a survey of target audience/s)
b) Justify choice of strategies relative to: i. Suitability for context ii. Suitability for each of the target audiences iii. Fit with change theory/s and/or implementation process iv. Evidence of each strategy’s prior use and effectiveness

Other (Not Listed) Sample Content Preview:

Implementation of Rapid Response Team Plan
Name
Institution of Affiliation
Instructor
Date
Implementation of Rapid Response Team Plan
Mortality has risen due to the lack of the rapid response team in many of the health care centers. To cut down the high rate of immature deaths being observed within the health care center a rapid response team for each health care should be implemented. From the limited healthcare centers who have been able to implement the rapid response team, they have been able to observe the benefits associated with it. Scientific research shows that rapid response team has greatly changed those care centers. The findings show that with the rapid response team there has been a 50% reduction in the occurrence of cardiac arrests outside the ICU (Buist, 2002). There has also been 17% decrease in the cardiopulmonary arrests (DeVita, 2004). There has also been a decrease in the number of the patients who are admitted to the ICU by 44%, and the severe postoperative adverse events have reduced by 58%. The deaths which occur after operations has also gone down by 37%. This means that the days for the surgical patients to stay in the hospital have reduced from 23.8 days to 19.8 days (Bellomo, 2004). Moreover, there has been a decrease in the unnecessary transfers to the higher levels of care by an approximate of 30% (Goldhill, 1999). From the above statistics, it is clear that if we implement the rapid response team in our health care, then it is likely to be greatly effective for the society who depend on it. Then our main objective should be to reduce the level of deaths associated with the lack of rapid response team and improve the healthcare system in the health care centers. The target group for this change is the physicians, nurses, policy makers, therapists, clinical nurse specialists, allied health staff, medical facilitators such as the government representative.
Gap analysis
Take into consideration a situation where a patient has suffered from unpredicted cardiac arrest. All the medical practitioners are busy attending to the other patients such that if they have to come to the rescue of the patient, then it will take time before the rescue. Having in mind that cardiac arrest demands an instant attention, failure to do that the patient is at a very high risk of death. Studies from United States, Australia, United Kingdom and Canada indicate that 10% of the hospitalized patients die from preventable measures associated with the lack of the rapid response team. Another study in the above regions also stated that suboptimal care occurred in 54% of the hospitalized patients. Those patients require ICU care, but they are not given that care. Moreover, other patients who do not require the ICU care end up in the ICU yet they might not have needed that care if the rapid response team was there (Al-Qahtani & Al-Dorzi, 2010). It is clearly indicated that from the above practice the rapid response care team is likely to increase the safety of the patients as compared to its absence. As observed in the health care centers who have already adopted the rapid response team, the death has been reduced by twice of the previous years. It is no objection that if the rapid response system is introduced wit...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Other (Not Listed) Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!