Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
3 pages/β‰ˆ825 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Other (Not Listed)
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 12.96
Topic:

Change Proposal – Use of Advanced Diagnostics System

Other (Not Listed) Instructions:

Change Proposal
Technology has been credited with contributing to a safer patient environment. Create a change proposal for a new technology that will contribute to a safer patient environment. Examine human factors including resistance to change into the expanded use of informatics. Be sure to include how your proposed change will impact patient safety, how you will measure the impact of your change, and how you will communicate and implement this change.
Submissions Details:
Submit your response in a 3- to 5-page Microsoft Word document.
APA 6th edition needed. Turnitin has to be below 30%
Grading ruburic
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (17-19)
19 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (20-22)
22 points
Proficient (B Range) (22-25)
25 points
Exemplary (A Range) (25-28)
28 points
Summarized how proposal will impact patient safety.
Student did not submit assignment
Did not summarized how proposal will impact patient safety, or the details are vague or nonexistent.
Summarized how proposal will impact patient safety,
but there is a lack of detail.
Summarized how proposal will impact patient safety. Explanations were good but could be more detailed.
Thoroughly summarized how proposal will impact patient safety.
/ 28
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (17-19)
19 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (20-22)
22 points
Proficient (B Range) (22-25)
25 points
Exemplary (A Range) (25-28)
28 points
Summarized how impact of change will be measured.
Student did not submit assignment
Did not summarized how impact of change will be measured or the details are vague or nonexistent.
Summarized how impact of change will be measured, but there is a lack of detail.
Summarized how impact of change will be measured. Explanations were good but could be more detailed.
Summarized how impact of change will be measured. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas.
/ 28
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (19-22)
22 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (22-25)
25 points
Proficient (B Range) (26-28)
28 points
Exemplary (A Range) (29-32)
32 points
Summarized a communication strategy.
Student did not submit assignment
Did not summarized a communication strategy, or the details are vague or nonexistent.
Summarized a communication strategy, but there is a lack of detail.
Summarized a communication strategy. Explanations were good but could be more detailed.
Summarized a communication strategy. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas.
/ 32
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (19-22)
22 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (22-25)
25 points
Proficient (B Range) (26-28)
28 points
Exemplary (A Range) (29-32)
32 points
Examined the human factors including resistance to change.
Student did not submit assignment
Did not examine the human factors including resistance to change, or the details are vague or nonexistent.
Examined the human factors including resistance to change, but there is a lack of detail.
Examined the human factors including resistance to change. Explanations were good but could be more detailed.
Examined the human factors including resistance to change. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas.
/ 32
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14)
14 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16)
16 points
Proficient (B Range) (16-18)
18 points
Exemplary (A Range) (18-20)
20 points
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA); and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
Student did not submit assignment
Did not write in a clear, concise, and organized manner; nor demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA); and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA); and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation, but there is a lack of details.
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA); and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Explanations were good but could be more detailed.
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA); and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas.
/ 20
Rubric Total Score
Total
/ 140
Overall Score
Overall Score
No Submission0 points minimum
Emerging (F through D Range)96 points minimum
Satisfactory (C Range)110 points minimum
Proficient (B Range)124 points minimum
Exemplary (A Range)140 points minimum

Other (Not Listed) Sample Content Preview:

Change Proposal – Use of Advanced Diagnostics System
Your Name
Subject and Section
Professor’s Name
December 18, 2019
The healthcare system is perhaps one of the most fluid and changing industries in the whole society. Every month, changes in methods, technologies, and processes could occur depending on the results of researches that show the potential of a new practice or technology. Additionally, this need for change is furthered by the increasing demands of both patients and other state actors for constant improvement in the system.
One of the recent advancements in the healthcare system is the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in order to allocate resources effectively within the healthcare environment. This technology, also known as Patient Flow Congestion (PFC), allows the management within a healthcare organization to predict the influx of patients for days in advance, which contributes to a safer environment for the patients and a more efficient allocation of hospital resources CITATION Par19 \l 1033 (Park, Ko, Bae, Chang, & Kim, 2019).
In line with this, the author would propose the adoption of a PFC system, powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI), in a Tertiary Care Hospital. A Tertiary Care organization is chosen since the Return-On-Investments of an AI system would be more apparent for large hospitals than smaller ones. Thus, the succeeding sections include an assessment of the relative advantages and costs of adopting such a system, as well as practices that would help in the efficient implementation of the said practice. All in all, the author believes that the PFC system would decrease patient congestions and improve environmental safety for patients especially during rush hours.
Patient Flow Congestion
In order to achieve its purpose, the PFC system uses statistical data gathered within the hospital and (possibly) from outside organizations. This would allow its AI core to develop predictive models that would allocate manpower resources over the whole place. Thus, the system could already determine where hospital staff should be stationed as well and the number of resources that would be needed in different departments. In relation to the environmental safety of patients, it could be seen that the efficient distribution of workflow among the different departments (and perhaps to other hospitals) would reduce the risks of malpractices, delayed provision of care, and would allow a better ‘staff-to-patient ratio’, which would give the staff the capability to focus on the individual needs of the patients themselves CITATION Gar16 \l 1033 (Garnier, Chavez-Demoulin, Hameri, Niemi, & Wasserfallen, 2016).
Challenges in Implementation
Despite the advantages of the PFC system, the use of this predictive system would also be subject to different challenges for implementation including (1) personal and (2) organizational issues.
Personal Challenges
On the one hand, personal challenges include resistance to change. According to Ubel and Asch (2015), one of the main reasons for this resistance is the healthcare professional’s bias towards judgments that he made in the past. In line with the implementation of a...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Other (Not Listed) Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now