Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
1 page/≈275 words
Sources:
1 Source
Style:
APA
Subject:
Education
Type:
Other (Not Listed)
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 3.96
Topic:

Response to a Situation The Ethics of Consequences

Other (Not Listed) Instructions:

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:
Textbook: Chapter 2, 7, 12 (section: "The Ethics of Consequences"); review Chapter 9 (section: "The Munich Incident"), 10
Lesson
Minimum of 1 scholarly source
Introduction
The principle of utility involves maximizing happiness as a desirable outcome of decisions. Although it does not get directly said, there is an inverse intention to minimize the undesirable outcome of disaster. Utilitarian decisions are directed toward outcomes—that is, the consequences of decisions.
The 1972 Munich Olympics hostage situation was a high-tension moment, full of dangerous surprises and strategies to deal with the situation that did not work out for the best. Among the strategies was the idea to kill the leader of the terrorists so as to disrupt the terrorist plot and to allow a good outcome in which the hostages would be saved. In the situation, it was also entirely possible that a terrible outcome might occur in which all would die. The situation was an emergency.
The German legal system might eventually take the terrorists and their leader to trial, but first there was the need to end the hostage situation. The account in our text ends with, "But it was the lesser of two evils."
Initial Post Instructions
For the initial post, respond to the following as utilitarian ethicists:
How shall we reason through to the decision of the law enforcement authorities at the 1972 Munich Olympics?
How are we to balance protecting people versus allowing people to participate in and enjoy an event? After all, doing away with events entirely would be easier in terms of safety, but most people would say that that "solution" is worse than the problem.
Also, how does one approach dealing with threats in ways that do not alienate or marginalize groups of people? The Olympics bring this to the forefront, as it brings people together from literally all over the world in what is intended to be a welcoming environment.
Follow-Up Post Instructions
Respond to at least two peers or one peer and the instructor. Further the dialogue by providing more information and clarification.
Writing Requirements
Minimum of 3 posts (1 initial & 2 follow-ups)
Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons and an outside source)
APA format for in-text citations and list of references

Other (Not Listed) Sample Content Preview:

Response to a Situation
NameCourse
InstructorDate
The law enforcement and security forces were ill-prepared to deal with the security threats during the 1972 Munich massacre during the Olympics. The main aim was to minimize harm for everyone after the Israeli Olympic team had been held hostage by the Arab guerillas (Ruggiero, 2015). The West German police assumed that if the leader was killed the terrorists, would lead the group surrendering and the law enforcement authorities would need to consider the safety of the hostages and whether other people would be affected negatively (Finnane, 2015). The immediate and long-term consequences of intervening and failing to intervening ought to be prioritized.
There ought to be both physical and digital security in events to protect the people rather than doing away with events. Putting more resources in law enforcement and security would improve security, and fewer people will cause security concerns since there is adequate planning and response to the security issues. Proper security would improve the expe...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to ethics essays:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!