Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
Other
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 8.64
Topic:

Reflective Piece on Two Sociological Theories Social Sciences Essay

Essay Instructions:

Short reflective piece requirements (10 marks)
What: Choose two of the theories (or theorists) that we covered after Labelling Theory. Each must come from a DIFFERENT week. Using the 4Cs framework (more detail to follow) write no more than one page (TIMES NEW ROMAN, Font 12, and double spaced) per theory to answer the following questions:
Concepts
What key concepts or ideas from the theories you have chosen do you think are important and worthy to incorporate into discussions about crime and/or criminality? Why?
Connections
What connections do you draw between the theories and your own life experiences or those of someone who you know? Explain.
Challenges
What ideas, positions or assumptions do you want to challenge or argue within each theory? Why?
Changes
What changes in attitudes, thinking, or action are suggested by the theories? Explain
Note to writer:
I have attached the lectures labelled separately to be used to answer the above questions. Two separate weeks of lectures need to be addressed as per the requirements - one page for each theory. I have also attached the textbook for reference. Please use ASA format for any citations. If you need further clarification please contact me via the messaging system. Thank you kindly.

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Reflective Piece on Two Sociological Theories
Student's Name
Institutional Affiliation
Word Count (600 words)
Control Theory
The essential ideas or concepts in control theory worthy of discussion are that it views crime as a regular occurrence and that crime emanates from the absence of insufficient controls. This is important because it enables the criminal justice system to take a rather distinct viewpoint concerning how human behavioral conduct drives their needs and desires and predisposes them to deviance or, rather, criminality. In this way, the legal system maintains social order by controlling such desires to ensure conformity instead of deviance (Newburn 2017:246). This theory relates to my childhood experiences, whereby I was increasingly inclined to break the rules in the absence of practical controls. In other words, control theory explains my delinquent inclinations due to the absence of rules governing acceptable behavior or internalized norms. Therefore, I mostly engaged in unacceptable behaviors when I thought I would go unpunished (Newburn 2017:247).
I want to challenge the assumption that delinquent recidivism and delinquency emanate from primary groups' failure to exercise social control and offer proper non-delinquent roles to the child to ensure such roles are accepted as per societal expectations acceptable behavior (Newburn 2017:247). The assumption is not sufficient since people are racial beings and have autonomy concerning their behavioral inclinations. Therefore, people still commit crimes even in the presence of appropriate controls (e.g., constitutional rules) in society. The change in thinking and attitude suggested by the control theories is that people should view law-breaking as resulting from varying influences and forces (social "pulls" or pressures") which push individuals towards crime. This also creates the attitude that given all the pressures and opportunities towards criminality in the contemporary world, social pulls protect against participating in c...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to sociological imagination:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!