The Presidency, the Bureaucracy, and the making of USFP
The Presidency, the Bureaucracy, and the making of USFP
Considering the readings from chapters 7 & 8, video presentations, and your own research, draft a quality 1,250–1,500-word research paper addressing the following prompt:
The National Security Council and bureaucracy—State Department, Defense, and the CIA—officially serve the President’s agenda:
Offer a critical assessment of at least three different challenges any president faces in working with the NSC and bureaucracy to successfully formulate and implement a particular foreign policy program. Provide enough clarity and examples from both chapters and other sources used to defend your three challenges.
The paper must be in current Turabian style with default margins and in 12-pt Times New Roman font and submitted in an MS Word document. The paper must include a title page and reference page also in current Turabian format. You must include citations to a sufficient number of appropriate scholarly sources to fully support your assertions and conclusions (which will likely require more than the minimum number of citations); each paper must contain at least 5-7 scholarly sources original to this paper and not including the course textbook.
The Presidency, the Bureaucracy, and the Making of USFP
Name
Institution
Under the United States Constitution, the president and the congress are dissimilar institutions that have different powers as well as interests. Agreeably, these powers are divided between the two institutions but conflict is inevitable. The constitution system constantly generates an over ending struggles between the presidency and the congress. This paper examines the various challenges the US presidents face about foreign policy, the National Security Council (NSC) and the CIA.
The congress
The struggle between the president and congress is most in the policy arena where officials from the two institutions continue over and over especially in matters that relate to foreign policy. Notably, the fundamental struggle between the two institutions has not been well-publicized. There are two types of structures that are of great consequence. First, some institutions are charged with the role of interpreting, elaborating and carrying out public policy. This is generally known as bureaucracy. In essence, policy implies nothing unless they are given material expression by the bureaucracy. A well-designed agency can lead policy goals into reality whereas a poorly designed one can lead to serious problems. Since everyone in the policy system is aware of this, much of the struggle relating to foreign policy is a struggle over the bureaucratic structure which includes design, staffing, location and empowerment of administrative institutions.[Richard Hunt, A. Pacification: The American Struggle for Vietnam's hearts and minds. Routledge, 2018.]
Secondly, the presidency and the congress as institutions and their ability to exercise their powers related to policymaking. How well the two institutions succeed in achieving control over the government hinge on how each institution is organized internally, the type of resources that an institution has access to and the kind of authority it can master. The battle for control between the president and Congress, in this manner, while frequently showed in well-exposed fights over strategy, is to a great extent an auxiliary matter. It involves how well every foundation can design the structure of an open organization and exercise command over it, just as a matter of which foundation can best structure itself inside to improve its ability for control. Many scholars have focused on congress whilst few have focused on the presidency and its role in developing foreign policy. Positive theorist needs to investigate how presidents can inspect the basic issues of institutional control and development and their approach as compared to congress.[Richard, 2018, p. 90]
Bureaucracies
Most political institutions are established through the implementation of public authority. They are created through politics of structural select whereby the winners make use of public authority to create new structures and enact them on the whole polity. Following this, the typical economic ways conceiving institutions about deliberate exchange mutual benefit, transactional cost, contracting gains form trade and communal action problems. Whilst these feature of behavior is a major part of the coalition strategies and the political proces...
π Other Visitors are Viewing These Other Essay Samples:
- Philosophy Assignment: Philosophers and their Theories2 pages/β550 words | No Sources | Other | Social Sciences | Essay |
- Merton's Typology Essay1 page/β550 words | No Sources | Other | Social Sciences | Essay |
- New Public Management Values 3 pages/β825 words | 2 Sources | Other | Social Sciences | Essay |
- Critical Review of 3 articles: Environmental studies6 pages/β1650 words | 3 Sources | Other | Social Sciences | Essay |
- Political Policy Memo. Transportation Infrastructure2 pages/β550 words | Other | Social Sciences | Essay |
- Bullying Behavior by Students in the Classroom, Aspect of Bullying1 page/β275 words | 2 Sources | Other | Social Sciences | Essay |
- Marijuana Policy: Decriminalization Of Marijuana2 pages/β550 words | No Sources | Other | Social Sciences | Essay |