Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
1 page/≈275 words
Sources:
2 Sources
Style:
MLA
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 4.32
Topic:

The Learner's Paradox as The Concept of Inquiry of Knowledge

Essay Instructions:

Please write on one of the following prompts, explaining the reasoning succinctly and clearly in your own words. Your discussion should be about 300 words. It is due by midnight April 17.
In such a short paper, keeping your discussion focused is important. Quoting the text is not necessary, and will likely take away space you need to fully explain your points. Your TAs and I are here to answer any questions you may have. I recommend starting the paper early, so you have time to organize your thoughts and edit your writing. Because the assignment is so short, you won't have space to explain everything. So concentrate on explaining the most central points.
1. Start by explaining what the learner's paradox is, and what is paradoxical about it. Then, as clearly as you can, explain Socrates' solution to it, and his reasoning for this solution. Very briefly indicate a reason to think it works, or a reason to think it fails.
For course materials, see the Plato reading, the associated lecture video, and the handout from Thursday's discussion session.
2. Start by explaining what the question of personal identity is, and whether it concerns numerical identity or qualitative similarity. Then explain Locke's account of personal identity, Reid's objection to it, and proposed emendation. Very briefly indicate a reason to think he has saved the psychological criterion of personal identity, or a reason to think it fails.
For course materials, see the second reading (title includes both the names Locke and Reid), and the first and second personal identity lectures.Words Characters Reading time

Essay Sample Content Preview:
Name
Prof
Course Name
Due Date
The Learner's Paradox
The Learner's Paradox focuses on the concept of inquiry of knowledge. It is based on the argument that there is no need for inquiry if people know what they are looking for. This is because the purpose of an inquiry is to reveal already known information. On the other hand, if people do not know what they are looking for, then the inquiry becomes impossible (Carneades.org). In essence, if one does not know what they are looking for, then they don't have a basis on which to inquire in the first place. This is a paradox because it suggests that what people gather through inquiry is not necessarily new knowledge.
In his solution to this paradox, Socrates argued that searching and learning, like a wall, are recollection and not inquiry. His solution is based on the argument that the soul is immortal, born many times, and has seen and learned everything. That is why Socrates's 'slave,' following a series of questions, was able to probe the Pythagorean theorem without prior knowledge (Fine). The enslaved pers...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to identity:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now