Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
2 Sources
Level:
MLA
Topic:
Social Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 8.64
Topic:

Goode And Regnerus: Way In Which Goode Justified Methods (Essay Sample)

Instructions:

I have attached the reading material Goode and Regnerus which is needed to answer the following question. The Goode reading, only read from page 311-321.
Instructions: Answer the following questions in 2-4 complete sentences.
1. Explain at least one way in which Goode justified his methods, and at least one way in which Goode justified the ethics of his methods.

2. Identify the ways in which Erich Goode violated all four principles for protecting research subjects.
3. Should Goode's research have been published? Why or why not? [Note: It was published 20 years after the fact. In your answer, consider the ethics of the journal editor publishing an article that seemed to take inappropriate advantage of an unusual subject matter. Consider also whether Goode's research contributes something useful to sociology.]
4. Drawing from the Regnerus article, what does previous research conclude about gay parenting and child wellbeing?
5. What are the main claims of the Regnerus article?

source..
Content:

SOC201 Fall 2017
Assignment 1
Instructions: Answer the following questions in 2-4 complete sentences.
1 Explain at least one way in which Goode justified his methods, and at least one way in which Goode justified the ethics of his methods.
In his article, Goode discussed about the “Marijuana Interviews” that he did back in 1967, and the unexpected events which happened during its course. More particularly, he stated that in trying to interview the informants he both tried smoking Marijuana as well as sleeping with three of the women that served as his informants. However, he did not think that there was an ethics that is tied to his actions as well as a “Human Subjects Comittee” where he justified his methods (the failure to uphold these ethical considerations) as a failure by others in warning him about the “specified ways” that the subject must be treated. In the end, he justified the ethics of his method also as a failure of the institution to properly inform researchers about any guidelines that they must follow CITATION Goo99 \l 1033 (Goode, 1999).
2 Identify the ways in which Erich Goode violated all four principles for protecting research subjects.
The four main principles of protecting research subjects are; (1) minimizing the risk of harm, (2) obtaining informed consent, (3) protecting anonymity and confidentiality, and (4) avoiding deceptive practices. In retrospect of this work, these four could be argued as present from the statements that he made. With regards to the first and the fourth principle, I could argue that in having sex with his interviewees, Goode increased the risks of harming the participants, both emotionally and psychologically, as well as using sex (perhaps subcons

...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

  • Sociology Summary: Terrorism In North-Eastern Nigeria
    Description: Domestic terrorism in North-Eastern Nigeria. The paper notes that domestic terrorism impedes states institutions and economic development. ...
    1 page/≈275 words| 1 Source | MLA | Social Sciences | Essay |
  • Effects of Climate Change on Cities
    Description: How will climate change impact urbanites and the cities? and How people effect on the Climate Change? how cities adopt to climate change? Social Sciences Essay...
    7 pages/≈1925 words| 5 Sources | MLA | Social Sciences | Essay |
  • Dialogue Conversation: Should Women Have the Right to Choose Abortion
    Description: People should also look at the girl as a human being. At times people do not want to have abortions, but the circumstances surrounding them forces them. ...
    7 pages/≈1925 words| 4 Sources | MLA | Social Sciences | Essay |
Need a Plagiarism Free Essay?
Submit your instructions!