Democratic Gaps in Long Term Care in Ontario. Social Sciences Essay

Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Code/Title
Instructor
Date
Democratic Gaps in Long Term Care in Ontario.
Democratic governments have found pride in safeguarding the interest of public opinion and public participation in government decisions. Through democracy, people believe that the government will protect and uphold the rights and freedoms provided in the people's Constitution. The privatization of public institutions in democratic countries has always been received with great opposition, criticism, and rejections. Any attempt to privatize state-owned enterprises usually attract protest ( Biglaiser, Glen, Danis, Michelle, 83). These protests are from employees of states who feel their lives being threatened, and their job security being uncertain. Nationality groups also fear the ownership of these enterprises by foreigners. Another cause for the protest is the use of these enterprises for political patronage where politicians reward their loyalists with plum jobs and exaggerated salaries. All this protest is aimed at protecting the rights and freedoms of citizens. This paper aims to answer the question of how privatization of long-term care in Ontario sacrificed the freedom, equality, and solidarity of senior citizens.
In the context of the same democracies, the government is treated with so much legitimacy that it makes it easy for them to proceed and privatize. This is after deliberations and agreements, which to some extent, are never honored in the future. The privatization of long-term care in Ontario has caused serious threats to senior citizens and the caregivers. Senior citizens have freedoms and rights that need to be protected and cannot be achieved through privatization, and they can then much need to be done. For instance, in the privatization of long-term care, studies show that four aspects of security in the old age are highly undermined (Armstrong, Pat, Armstrong, Hugh, MacLeod, Krystal 2). This is about enterprises that are aimed at making a profit i.e., for-profit and those that have chain membership.
Security aspects that are undermined are security to Financial access. It is the right of every citizen in Canada to access both social and health care. Senior citizens are prone to elderly diseases and hence the need for long term care. But with privatization, the freedom of access to this essential service is limited by financial abilities. Those who can't afford it can't access it. This ends up creating a class dispute of those who can afford to access quality and better care versus those who can't afford it. However, the reason why privatization is fronted is to provide shocks to a straining economy which is characterized by the poor quality of service. But now, in private enterprises, quality is based on the ability to afford, which is against the freedom to health care access. All citizens have equal rights and freedoms. This guides that all senior citizens should receive equal treatment in matters Long term care. However, with the privatization of this sector, there is no equality in service. Private sectors have taken advantage of the tipping economic benefit from the aging care business and, as a result, capitalized in financial margins. This has led to the discrimination of senio...