Reading and Annotating 101. Challenging an Argument.

Student's Name
Professor's Name
Course
Date
Annotated Notes
Challenging an Argument
An important take away from the guide is the way a person can justifiably challenge the argument. This section has enlightened me on a structured and logical approach to debates that involve controversies or cross-arguments. I attach much weight to finding the refutability of an argument without letting one's personal bias interfere in the process. The presence of a different explanation and the availability of evidence that can weaken an argument are vital points (Jeffrey 30). I would use it as a guide whenever faced by situations where I am a part of a debate.
Inductive Reasoning
The section about inductive reasoning is particularly significant for me as a learner of research. It builds my insight on the tactical path to judge the authenticity of the evidence. The three-pronged criteria revolving around sufficiency, generalizability, and relevance are now embedded in my memory and will keep informing my approach towards evaluating evidence in the future (Jeffrey 33). By sticking to these criteria, I can isolate reliable evidence from non-reliable ones. This learning, when applied to a research process, can significantly add to the credibility and transferability of the findings.
The examples of research relying on inductive reasoning are also a significant addition to my knowledge. These examples serve as the specimens of the path to solid reasoning. I can use these examples as the inspiration to any research project that I embark on in the future wit...