The Rebalancing Power Come From Individuals Working Collectively?
For the first three paragraphs, don't summarize the texts. Make connections between three texts, compare different authors in one paragraph on the smiliar issue they have discussed. Each paragraph should have a unique idea and using different texts to support each idea. The goal of this paper is to make connections between different texts. Each paragraph should have an idea that can connect at least two authors. Make a more clear and direct thesis statement. Revise the rough draft according to the revision activities in attachments, and suggestions made by my peer.
Below is the link to article "An elephant crackup".
https://www(dot)nytimes(dot)com/2006/10/08/magazine/08elephant.html
This is the pdf copy of “Rent Seeking and the Making of an Unequal Society”. The passage is chapter 2 on the website.
http://resistir(dot)info/livros/stiglitz_the_price_of_inequality.pdf
TEXTS:
Klein, Naomi. “Hot Money”
Siebert, Charles. “An Elephant Crackup?”
Stiglitz, Joseph E. “Rent Seeking and the Making of an Unequal Society”
PROMPT:
Consider the idea of power in all three readings—who holds the power in the social structures described, and who does not. Klein and Stiglitz both make strong cases against free markets and trade, using “indiscriminate economic growth” (Klein, 86) and “rent seeking” (Stiglitz) as examples of unregulated power leading to a climate crisis and vast inequality. Although both of these writers focus on political reform and governmental responsibility, they also argue (perhaps implicitly) that the larger community must come together to restructure our societies and economy in order to create more equality. In Siebert’s essay, there is a power struggle between people and elephants, as well as an imbalance of power between people due to war. Siebert relates various people’s experiences, research, and actions to show the role of communal efforts in restoring balance. Using all three texts, respond to the following question: How might the rebalancing of power on a large scale come from individuals working collectively?
FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS:
--Is it possible for small communities to regulate misuse of power or does it have to be a larger (countrywide, worldwide) effort?
--Is there a difference between government and community? How does the role of communities parallel or contrast with the role of government in these three readings? Does the line between these entities blur?
LOGISTICS:
Please proofread carefully.
Quotations should be carefully transcribed and attributed. You must use MLA bibliographic conventions when quoting the text (use your Keys for Writers book for reference). You do not need a Works Cited page. Use 1.0-inch margins on all sides, double-spacing, and 12-point Times New Roman font. Number all pages. Provide your name, date, and course section on the first page. Title your paper. Submit your paper via Canvas; email submissions are not acceptable. The penalties outlined in the syllabus will apply to all late submissions.
Professor’s Name
Course
Date
How the Rebalancing Power on a Large Scale Come From Individuals Working Collectively?
The question of who holds more power in social structures might appear easy to answer, but it is not. Currently, the world is driven by capitalism, and wealthy people’s wishes, ideas, and opinions are highly valued as compared to those of ordinary individuals. In other words, it would be appropriate to say that “money talks.” The accumulation of wealth by a few people should be blamed for today’s divided society. No person is concerned about the well-being of others as long as one continues to amass more affluence. Naomi Klein, Joseph Stiglitz, and Charles Siebert affirm that rebalancing the power on a large scale requires individuals to work collectively by focusing on the same objectives that promote the conservation of the environment, eradicate inequality, and restore proper relationships between humans and animals.
Klein, Stiglitz, and Siebert portray that the most significant change in society can occur if people learn how to respect themselves and care for wild animals. For many years, the ridge between individuals and animals has been broadening gradually. What is more, humans have become enemies of themselves such that wealthy people undermine poor individuals’ rights and privileges. Klein makes it clear that enmity among people is a significant challenge in implementing green energy programs. That is the reason why individuals and governments do not support one another, but instead, they are busy criticizing each other on the world platform. Stiglitz claims that capitalism has caused economic inequality where rich people continue to be richer while poor individuals become poorer. In other words, he is trying to mean that it is a “man-eat-man” society. Business owners are setting harsh conditions for their employees to prevent them from rising to the top social statuses. Similarly, Siebert indicates how people’s selfishness is contributing to the increasing aggression between humans and elephants. For several decades, people have continually encroached natural habitats without considering the repercussions of their activities. For this reason, elephants have changed their behaviors’ negatively, expressing their attitude toward the destroyers of their habitat, who happen to be humans. Consequently, the three authors show that individuals’ failure to handle their colleagues well and take care of wild animals have caused adverse effects on the environment, climate, and economy.
The three readings make it clear that society is suffering in multiple ways for entrusting individuals at the top of the social hierarchy, who happens to prioritize enriching themselves at the expense of the poor people and helpless animals. For this reason, Stiglitz says, “Much of what has gone on can be described by the words “moral deprivation.” Something wrong happened to the moral compass of so many of the people working in the financial sector and elsewhere” (Stiglitz 13) At this point, the author means that humans and animals are suffering due to the negligence of a few powerful and wealthy individuals. W...
👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These MLA Essay Samples:
- The Crucible by Arthur Miller: John and Elizabeth Proctor's Dilemmas2 pages/≈550 words | 3 Sources | MLA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- Literary Review of Wodehouse's Jeeves Takes Charge4 pages/≈1100 words | 2 Sources | MLA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- Desiderata: Purpose and Lessons Learned1 page/≈275 words | 3 Sources | MLA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- The importance of the Constitutional Convention Essay3 pages/≈825 words | No Sources | MLA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- How English Composition Course Helped Me Improve2 pages/≈550 words | No Sources | MLA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- Charles Taylor4 pages/≈1100 words | No Sources | MLA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- Human versus robotic space missions (ESS 102)1 page/≈275 words | 2 Sources | MLA | Literature & Language | Essay |