Gun Control 2

Name:
Professor:
Course:
Date:
Gun Control
In recent times, the media has been abuzz with gun control discussions and debates due to the recent shootings that have been reported eliciting much emotive responses from both pro gunners and con gunners alike. The challenge is therefore, once again, upon us, to prepare ourselves for a debate and action that will lead to the prevention of further unnecessary loss of lives through irresponsible use of guns while at the same time protecting our constitutional right to bear arms (Crooker, 24).
In as much as both liberals and conservatives both support a degree of gun control, they do not present similar proposals to tackle this rising problem and as a result, this different approach, is creating a debate in the manner in which gun control should be handled. When we look at the bill of rights that are entrenched in the American constitution, we see clear intentions of our forefathers for every citizen to enjoy a safe and retain natural rights as Americans. In order to appreciate a more accurate position of the constitution we should then analyze the motivation (Congress (U.S.) 274) behind the 2nd Amendment and then seek to clarify the critical debate between the pros and cons of this important issue among Americans.
In Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that the adjective 'well-regulated' implies nothing more than the imposition of proper discipline and training. The Second Amendment is the only amendment to the Constitution, which states a purpose. The word "militia" has several meanings. It can be a body of citizens enrolled for military service where full time duty is required only in emergencies or the eligible pool of citizens callable into military service (Carter, 56). With a better understanding of the aforementioned significant ideas, we can now turn to the thoughts proposed by differing positions.
As we have already stated previously in this passage, we often find ourselves engrossed in deep-heated discussions in an attempt to find a solution, if possible, to the rising number of gun and gun-related violence cases whenever another tragedy grabs news headlines and the nation`s attention in the US. It is not an easy question to address and many haven`t formed full opinions about. This can be attributed to the fact that more often than not the anti-control arguers have always had a sustained ability to stun in their discussion and therefore altogether eclipsing the troubles that affect our society that stem from these weapons (Crooker 52).
If we take time and look at it from a neutrality point of view, we can effectively conclude that pro-gun debate points often tend to have weighty issues addressed in a very concrete manner. This is not to say that we should allow the pro-gunners to have an advantage in the articulation of points that tend to support their argument but rather the manner in which these arguments are brought forward tends to add more value and bring for...