Argumentative Essay For Birth Control, Morning After Pills

Research Paper RequirementsFor this new unit, you will be writing a research paper on a topic of your choice. You must choose a controversial topic and it must be pre-approved with Miss Butcher before the research starts. The idea is to help you develop proper researching skills, demonstrate your ability to use the research to prove a point, and enhance your ability to correctly format an argumentative essay. Due Date: Currently set for November 18th. The following topics are on the “NO” list: Abortion, Capital Punishment, Civil Rights, and the Holocaust. Your Job: a 7-10 page research paper in MLA format with a Works Cited page1. Choose a stance on the topic a. Decide which side you want to support and your initial thoughts on why you want to support that side.2. Research a controversial topica. Need at least 6 sourcesi. 2 booksii. 1 peer reviewed Journal Articleiii. 1 Websiteiv. 1 Database search (instructions on my website)v. 1. Other Sources: interviews, documentaries, surveys etc.b. Fill out at least 20 Notecards for research (instructions on my website)3. Once research is complete, you will organize your thoughts in an outline (instructions on my website). 4. Write your first draft- must be typed for easier editing. 5. Self-Edit and fix any errors that you have found.6. Peer Edit- student or adult must sign your draft and changes must be apparent to earn the points for the Editing process. 7. Fix errors and print the final copy. MAKE SURE IT IS IN MLA FORMAT!Argumentative Paper Format*Please note that this is only a sample format. There are multiple ways to organize an INTRODUCTIONo 1-2 paragraphs topsargumentative papero PURPOSE: To set up and state one's claim o OPTIONAL ELEMENTS Make your introductory paragraph interesting. How can you draw your readers in? What background information, if any, do we need to know in order to understand your claim? If you don't follow this paragraph with a background information paragraph, please insert that info here.o REQUIRED ELEMENTS If you're arguing about a literary work—state author + title If you're arguing about an issue or theory – provide brief explanationor your of issue/theory. If you're arguing about a film—state director, year + title STATE your claim at the end of your introductory paragraph BACKGROUND PARAGRAPHo 1-2 paragraphs tops; Optional (can omit for some papers). Also, sometimesthis info is incorporated into the introduction paragraph (see above). o PURPOSE: Lays the foundation for proving your argument.o Will often include: Summary of works being discussed  Definition of key terms Explanation of key theories SUPPORTING EVIDENCE PARAGRAPH #1o PURPOSE: To prove your argument. Usually is one paragraph but it can belonger.o Topic Sentence: What is one item, fact, detail, or example you can tell yourreaders that will help them better understand your claim/paper topic? Your
answer should be the topic sentence for this paragraph.
o Explain Topic Sentence: Do you need to explain your topic sentence? If so,
do so here.
o Introduce Evidence: Introduce your evidence either in a few words (As Dr.
Brown states ―...‖) or in a full sentence (―To understand this issue we first
need to look at statistics).
o State Evidence: What supporting evidence (reasons, examples, facts,
statistics, and/or quotations) can you include to prove/support/explain your
topic sentence?
o Explain Evidence: How should we read or interpret the evidence you are
providing us? How does this evidence prove the point you are trying to make
in this paragraph? Can be opinion based and is often at least 1-3 sentences. o Concluding Sentence: End your paragraph with a concluding sentence that
reasserts how the topic sentence of this paragraph helps up better understand and/or prove your paper's overall claim.
Courtesy the Odegaard Writing & Research Center http://www(dot)depts(dot)washington(dot)edu/owrc
Page 1 of 3
 SUPPORTING EVIDENCE PARAGRAPH #2, 3, 4 etc. o Repeat above
 COUNTERARGUMENT PARAGRAPH
o PURPOSE: To anticipate your reader's objections; make yourself sound more
objective and reasonable.
o Optional; usually 1-2 paragraphs tops
o What possible argument might your reader pose against your argument
and/or some aspect of your reasoning? Insert one or more of those
arguments here and refute them.
o End paragraph with a concluding sentence that reasserts yournpaper's claim
as a whole.
 CONCLUSION PART 1: SUM UP PARAGRAPH
o PURPOSE: Remind readers of your argument and supporting evidence
o Conclusion you were most likely taught to write in High School o Restates your paper's overall claim and supporting evidence
 CONCLUSION PART 2: YOUR “SO WHAT” PARAGRAPH
o PURPOSE: To illustrate to your instructor that you have thought critically
and analytically about this issue.
o Your conclusion should not simply restate your intro paragraph. If your conclusion says almost the exact same thing as your introduction, it may indicate that you have not done enough critical thinking during the course of your essay (since you ended up right where you started).
o Your conclusion should tell us why we should care about your paper. What is the significance of your claim? Why is it important to you as the writer or to me as the reader? What information should you or I take away from this?
o Your conclusion should create a sense of movement to a more complex understanding of the subject of your paper. By the end of your essay, you should have worked through your ideas enough so that your reader understands what you have argued and is ready to hear the larger point (i.e. the "so what") you want to make about your topic.
o Your conclusion should serve as the climax of your paper. So, save your strongest analytical points for the end of your essay, and use them to drive your conclusion
o Vivid, concrete language is as important in a conclusion as it is elsewhere-- perhaps more essential, since the conclusion determines the reader's final impression of your essay. Do not leave them with the impression that your argument was vague or unsure.
o WARNING: It's fine to introduce new information or quotations in your conclusions, as long as the new points grow from your argument. New points might be more general, answering the "so what" question; they might be quite specific. Just avoid making new claims that need lots of additional support.
Courtesy the Odegaard Writing & Research Center http://www(dot)depts(dot)washington(dot)edu/owrc
Page 2 of 3
OUTLINE WORKSHOP
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND
SUPPORTING EVIDENCE #1
SUPPORTING EVIDENCE #2
SUPPORTING EVIDENCE #3
COUNTERARGUMENT
SUM UP CONCLUSION
 Sum up claim + supporting evidence statements SO WHAT CONCLUSION