the Korean War, the Ireland War, and the Philippine War History Essay

Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
Course
Date
An Analysis of the Extents to Which the Korean War, the Ireland War, and the Philippine War Can Be Justified As Rational Ways of Pursuing Political and Economic Interests
Introduction
For a long time now, political and economic factors have played a central role in the war. However, Form (143) explains that the current political landscape imposes minimal considerations on the economic aspects of civil and interstate wars. Welch Jr. (9) reveals that most of the civil wars have camouflaged to embrace a self-financing attribute. Such a position is attributed to the fact that both the affected governments and rebel groups tend to seek for alternative sources of fiscal support in order to sustain their military campaigns particularly after the detrimental decline in the post-Cold War superpower support. Lowe (13) explains that combatant self-financing initiatives in historic battles such as the Korean War, the Ireland War, and the Philippine War saw great mutations from the conventional plunder and pillage ideologies to the adoption of strategies aimed at enhancing the levels of diaspora remittances, the hidden issues of trade in the highly scarce and lucrative natural resources such as oil, gas and mineral ores, and attraction of foreign aid. As a consequence, Carson (1901) reveals that the term “resource wars” was established by policymakers and analysts in order to demystify the increasing role of the lucrative natural resources in fueling wars. On the other hand, West, Philip, and Gregg (4) explain that the increasing attention on the economic impacts of interstate warfare found a great expression in the ideology of “war economies.”
A clear view of the Korean War, the Ireland War, and the Philippine War from the perspectives of a political economy plays a critical role in enhancing an analyst’s levels of comprehension of the primary dynamics and practicalities of these feuds. Similarly, Lowe (11) explains that such analyses could be of the critical essence in fostering the systematic comprehension of the underlying effects of the wars above in the economic positions of the countries involved. Carson (1901) explains that any effort put forth to foster the analysis of the political economy based on the effects of armed conflict needs to be considered on the basis of the contemporary policy development frameworks adopted by the associated governments, non-governmental institutions, donor agencies and the private sector institutions that are concerned with the issues of peace building and war. The current study seeks to undertake a critical analysis of the extents to which the Korean War, the Ireland War, and the Philippine War need to be justified as rational ways of pursuing political and economic interests.
War as an Alternative Means of Politics
Ohanian (4) describes war as an instrument of fostering political continuations by application of “other means.” A critical analysis of the statement above reveals that by all means, war is never started by the local populace of a country. People in their right senses do not begin battles without embracing a clear strategy of what needs to be attained by the conflict and how t...