Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
4 pages/≈1100 words
Sources:
No Sources
Style:
MLA
Subject:
History
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 14.4
Topic:

Nathaniel Bacon Problem

Essay Instructions:

Questions and Sources Choose 3 good Evidence to support the authors argument. Focus Questions What evidence do we have to support Mark Peterson’s thesis that Bacon’s Rebellion primarily resulted from uneven distribution of land? Summary of Mark Peterson’s Thesis: Early settlers in Virginia were granted large tracts of fertile land in the tidewater region, while later settlers—many of whom had been indentured servants—were given smaller plots of less fertile land located near Indian settlements. Because of their proximity to the colony’s frontier, later settlers were more vulnerable to attacks by Native Americans. These same settlers wanted to take over Indian land. Wealthier Virginians opposed this because it was to their advantage to keep peace with the Natives. Thus the uneven distribution of land led to Bacon’s Rebellion, which was largely a conflict between Virginia’s two economic classes. Sources Note: Some spelling, formatting, and punctuation marks have been added to the source texts excerpted below to make them easier to read. Nathaniel Bacon, “Declaration of the People,” 1676 In the midst of the rebellion, Nathaniel Bacon distributed a “Declaration of the People” in which he laid out all of the complaints of the rebels and Virginia’s lower classes against Berkeley and the Virginia elite. 1. For having, upon specious pretenses of public works, raised great unjust taxes upon the commonalty for the advancement of private favorites and other sinister ends, but no visible effects in any measure adequate; for not having, during this long time of his government, in any measure advanced this hopeful colony either by fortifications, towns, or trade. 2. For having abused and rendered contemptible the magistrates of justice by advancing to places of judicature scandalous and ignorant favorites. 3. For having wronged his Majesty’s prerogative and interest by assuming monopoly of the beaver trade and for having in it unjust gain betrayed and sold his Majesty’s country and the lives of his loyal subjects to the barbarous heathen. 4. For having protected, favored, and emboldened the Indians against his Majesty’s loyal subjects, never contriving, requiring, or appointing any due or proper means of satisfaction for their many invasions, robberies, and murders committed upon us. 5. For having, when the army of English was just upon the track of those Indians, who now in all places burn, spoil, murder and when we might with ease have destroyed them who then were in open hostility, for then having expressly countermanded and sent back our army by passing his word for the peaceable demeanor of the said Indians, who immediately prosecuted their evil intentions, committing horrid murders and robberies in all places, being protected by the said engagement and word past of him the said Sir William Berkeley, having ruined and laid desolate a great part of his Majesty’s country, and have now drawn themselves into such obscure and remote places and are by their success so emboldened and confirmed by their confederacy so strengthened that the cries of blood are in all places, and the terror and consternation of the people so great, are now become not only difficult but a very formidable enemy who might at first with ease have been destroyed. 6. And lately, when, upon the loud outcries of blood, the assembly had, with all care, raised and framed an army for the preventing of further mischief and safeguard of this his Majesty’s colony. 7. For having, with only the privacy of some few favorites without acquainting the people, only by the alteration of a figure, forged a commission, by we know not what hand, not only without but even against the consent of the people, for the raising and effecting civil war and destruction, which being happily and without bloodshed prevented; for having the second time attempted the same, thereby calling dow1n our forces from the defense of the frontiers and most weakly exposed places. 8. For the prevention of civil mischief and ruin amongst ourselves while the barbarous enemy in all places did invade, murder, and spoil us, his Majesty’s most faithful subjects Of this and the aforesaid articles we accuse Sir William Berkeley as guilty of each and every one of the same, and as one who has traitorously attempted, violated, and injured his Majesty’s interest here by a loss of a great part of this his colony and many of his faithful loyal subjects by him betrayed and in a barbarous and shameful manner exposed to the incursions and murder of the heathen. And we do further declare these the ensuing persons in this list to have been his wicked and pernicious councilors, confederates, aiders, and assisters against the commonalty in these our civil commotions. Sir Henry Chichley Lieut. Coll. Christopher Wormeley William Sherwood John Page Clerk John Cluffe Clerke John West Hubert Farrell Thomas Reade Matthew Kempe Joseph Bridger William Claiburne Junior Thomas Hawkins Phillip Ludwell Robert Beverley Richard Lee Thomas Ballard William Cole Richard Whitacre Nicholas Spencer Analyze the Evidence 1. As you review the sources--the "Declaration," the map, and the Background information--select from them eight phrases, sentences, or visual data that support Mark Peterson’s thesis that the system of land distribution created a two-class society that came into open and violent dispute. Bring your evidence notes to the next class meeting. 2. In class, discuss your evidence with the students in your group. Working together, sort your evidence, discarding anything that does not support Mark Peterson’s argument. Once you have selected the BEST evidence, organize it into three categories of arguments (concepts). Write the arguments on the top row of the Arguments and Evidence Chart. Below each argument, list the appropriate supporting evidence. And we do further demand that the said Sir William Berkeley with all the persons in this list be forthwith delivered up or surrender themselves within four days after the notice hereof, or otherwise we declare as follows. That in whatsoever place, house, or ship, any of the said persons shall reside, be hid, or protected, we declare the owners, masters, or inhabitants of the said places to be confederates and traitors to the people and the estates of them is also of all the aforesaid persons to be confiscated. And this we, the commons of Virginia, do declare, desiring a firm union amongst ourselves that we may jointly and with one accord defend ourselves against the common enemy. And let not the faults of the guilty be the reproach of the innocent, or the faults or crimes of the oppressors divide and separate us who have suffered by their oppressions. These are, therefore, in his Majesty’s name, to command you forthwith to seize the persons above mentioned as traitors to the King and country and them to bring to Middle Plantation and there to secure them until further order, and, in case of opposition, if you want any further assistance you are forthwith to demand it in the name of the people in all the counties of Virginia. Nathaniel Bacon General by Consent of the people. Animated Map of the Tidewater of Virginia

Essay Sample Content Preview:
Name:
Institution:
Tutor:
Date:
What evidence do we have to support Mark Petersons thesis that Bacons Rebellion
Primarily resulted from uneven distribution of land?
According to Mark Peterson, the struggle that encapsulates the Bacon's Rebellion was mainly to do with uneven distribution of land. This led to the rise of a two-class society that openly and violently disputed against one another. Bacon was against Governor Berkeley, who seemed keen to safeguard the interests of Native Americans to ensure peaceful coexistence. Among these interests was the issue of land.
Why the rebellion was an issue of uneven land distribution
The inability of some planters, part of the commonality, to pay the taxes was one of the grievances highlighted in the declaration of the people. Such planters had smaller tracts of land and thus unlike larger planters, who owned larger pieces of land, could not comfortably afford the taxation. Unjust raise of taxes, in the pretext of public works, was first in the list of the rebels' grievances forwarded to the governor. To worsen the situation for smaller planters, the prices of tobacco were extremely low. In short, the rebelling Virginians behind the Bacon Rebellion were facing a combination of heavy taxation burden and low tobacco prices. King Charles II made two major grants of the country in order to gratify several nobles. Such grants were of both the plantations and the uncultivated lands. Such lands had for many years been settled and improved through charters granted to the colony by King Charles's Royal ancestors. Distinction between the grants was made on the basis of Southern and Northern Virginia grants. Only in the year 1674 did the grants begin to be implemented. Complaints intensified against the grants and several personnel were sent to England to meet the King for discussions on the matter. Taxation on tobacco, alongside other taxes, was imposed to pay for the costs.
The discontent among the commo...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to civil war:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!