Dropping the atomic bomb essay. History Assignment.
Margins must be 1.”
Font must be either Times New Roman 12 or Arial 11.
Paper must be double-spaced.
Paper must be 2-3 pages. (This means 2 full pages and does not include the cover sheet.)
Paper must have a cover sheet that includes your name.
Paper should not have a heading on the first page of text. The title of your paper should start at the 1” margin. The text of your paper will start one double-space below the title.
Discuss the following in your essay:
Was America justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Japan in order to bring about Japanese surrender? (Discuss American and Japanese casualties and projected casualties, along with Japanese opposition to unconditional surrender.) After reading the assigned articles and understanding the consequences of a delayed surrender and of dropping the bombs, would you, personally, have authorized their use? Why or why not? Be sure to fully justify your conclusions.
Professor:
Course:
Date:
Atomic Bombs
During World War II, the American military employed the use of atomic bombs to conquer two cities in Japan. They developed a functional atomic bomb during the war and named it the Manhattan Project (Ichiyo & Muto, 178). A lot of the work was done on the nuclear bomb around July 1945. In August 1945, the U.S military dropped its first atomic bomb over the city of Hiroshima and the second one over the city of Nagasaki. Questions raised over the convincement by Americans to drop this bomb have arisen for long and this essay will respond to the concerns.
The bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima was justified. It was a response to the attacks on their submarines by the Japanese, while they had not been engaged in the war with them. It was clear the U. S was desperate in winning the war and stamping authority as a world power then. It had to find a way it would cause fear and force the nations to respect them (Sugiyama, & Hiromi 635). The U.S, just like any other nation during the period, was stirring towards the culmination of the World War II and opted to embrace a stand that appeared to limit the sum of causalities in the warfare (Yamaguchi et al 23)
The application of explosive arms was a rational act by the United States due to an extreme rise in reported causalities, both soldierly and the citizens. Up to the topmost positions of the U.S army, about 135,000 lives were lost. It would mean more deaths if they never stopped fighting. Even though this act was unpleasant, it was the only quick way to make the Japanese surrender without shame and thus, certainly justified. The government of the U.S had more interest in ending the war rather than cause...
You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to world war 2:
- Summary of Phillips' "Sniper Elite III: Death".1 page/≈275 words | MLA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- Performing Culture: Olympic Opening Ceremonies. Essay2 pages/≈550 words | APA | Visual & Performing Arts | Essay |
- The International Organizations: Hegemons2 pages/≈550 words | 5 Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Research Paper |
- Discussion 1. The Chinese Exclusion Act 1882. History2 pages/≈550 words | MLA | History | Other (Not Listed) |
- Art History Compare Painting. Visual & Performing Arts Essay5 pages/≈1375 words | APA | Visual & Performing Arts | Essay |
- Discussion. Global Managerial economics. Management Essay. 2 pages/≈550 words | APA | Management | Essay |
- Civil Liberties - Korematsu Case Discussion Essay.1 page/≈275 words | MLA | Literature & Language | Essay |