Analysis Of A Roman Sculpture Terracotta "Bust Of A Man" (Essay Sample)
Write a 2-3 page report on its qualities and significances showed in the link above.
Consider the following questions:
what material is the object made out of? what is its date? do we know where it was found?
what does the object depict? what is the significance of what is depicted?
who was the object's intended audience? upper class? lower class? was this object made to be used?
how does this object relate to material studied in this class?
what does this object tell you about the culture which produced it?
1 or 2 sources must come from materials mentioned in the website: http://cl102.blog
The portrait above is a Roman sculpture terracotta, a sculpture made in earthenware, representing the Bust of a man. It is a life-size portrait of a man believed to be based on a death mask accounting for the individualized features of a mature man. The art is reputed to have been a study of a marble or bronze bust. According to Warren's records, the sculpture was found somewhere beyond Pozzuoli and this side Cumae by 1901. It was later purchased from him, Edward Perry Warren, by MFA, Museum of Fine Arts in December 1901.
What material is the object made out of?
The material used in making the Roman sculpture is unknown. However, there were many theories which were used to discover what the statue was made out of. Some historians have tried to connect the sculpture to the Roman death masks such as the fervor or enthusiasm which the Greek historian Polybius describes in his accounts to identify the material used in making the object. While quoting Chase and Caskey, Murley (236) opines that “the sculpture was created from a mold taken from the face of a live subject.” However, Kleiner (1992) disputed the claims made above and stated the sculpture was “too animated” to be centered on a cast and appeared to be a “bozzetto,” an initial prototype of a “more finished work of bronze or marble.” Another theory used in identifying the material used in making the art was suggested by Fejfer (2008) who questioned the use of terracotta in that portrait. A close analysis of the art reveals that the artist adeptly retouched the object by adding clay and using model instruments in the hair and the pupils.
What does the object depict?
The object is a Roman sculpture depicting the life-size portrait of a man and it is vastly believed to be based on a death mask. Death masks were thought to serve different purposes in Rome. For instance, they were used in remembering those who had passed on. They were also used as a way or means for the living to reconnect with the past. It also shows that the object was made out of bronze to preserve it for future generations since bronze is ranked among the most excellent works of antiquity and it produces better casting as well as having superior tensile st
- HIS391 Assignment: Dynasties that Existed in China in Ancient TimeDescription: By studying the present system of government in China, I will be able to identify major changes that have taken place and the factors that contributed to those changes....10 pages/≈2750 words | 15 Sources | MLA | History | Essay |
- America And China, Historical Perspective Research AssignmentDescription: Reflection on a pertinent contemporary issue that has appeared in the NY Times. Bring some historical perspective to this contemporary issue in the Asian world...3 pages/≈825 words | 1 Source | MLA | History | Essay |
- Compare the northern reaction to john brown in 1859 with the southern reactionDescription: Compare the northern reaction to john brown in 1859 with the southern reaction...1 page/≈275 words | 3 Sources | MLA | History | Essay |