Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
11 pages/≈3025 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
MLA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 47.52
Topic:

Ethical Implications of Euthanasia. Health, Medicine, Nurcing Essay

Essay Instructions:

Paper III: Argumentative Research Paper


Purpose and Description


The aim of composing an argumentative research paper is not only to summarize existing perspectives or simply to inform readers about a topic. You have been developing these skills throughout the course, and you should use them to support your writing process, but they are not ends in themselves; rather, they are a means to achieve more complex rhetorical objectives. Your aim for this assignment, specifically, will be to construct a research-based argument that contributes something new to an ongoing scholarly conversation. The instructions described below are designed to guide you through this process. Although your own process may take a different approach, familiarize yourself with this suggested process in order to ensure that your process produces the same results.


 


Invention and Inquiry                                                            



  • Identify the core problem that motivates your research;

  • Revisit your research question and refine/refocus it where necessary;

  • Gather together the resources you have developed throughout the semester (especially those of WEIII);

  • Note the different perspectives represented in the conversation you have defined;

  • Consider where you stand with respect to core problem and competing perspectives;

  • Draft a thesis statement in which you position yourself within the conversation (based on the research you have completed, the evidence you have gathered, and what contribution you hope to make to the scholarly conversation).


The Composing Process



  • Introduce your topic and define the scope of your paper;

  • Provide background on your topic and why it should interest to your audience;

  • Use the sources you have gathered to position yourself in a scholarly conversation;

  • Add your own research findings based on the evidence you have gathered and analyzed;

  • Draw a conclusion about the topic that adds something new to the conversation;

  • Conclude your paper by reaffirming the importance of the issue and pointing toward additional research and/or analysis that can be done to better understand and potentially act on it.


Specific Requirements


Your paper should:



  • Articulate and develop a clear and compelling thesis;

  • Position your argument within a scholarly conversation;

  • Fully integrate a minimum of 7 sources into your argument (six of which must be scholarly);

  • Be written in a clear, precise, and active prose style;

  • Include a title that reflects the spirit and scope of your paper;

  • Be 3000-3500 words in length (double-spaced, one-inch margins, 12 point Garamond or Times New Roman typeface);

  • Be uploaded to Canvas as a Word document by 11:59 pm on November 22


The work of joining a scholarly conversation is neither simple nor easy. As you have learned throughout the semester, it requires that we learn about existing scholarship and find ways that we can contribute to it through our own, independent research. It is difficult work, but if done well, you can use your writing to join conversations and help to address important problems both in the academy and in the context of work and community life. Please write or stop by my office (or both) if you have questions about this assignment or anything else related to the course.

Essay Sample Content Preview:
Name:
Professor’s Name:
Course:
Date:
Ethical Implications of Euthanasia
Euthanasia refers to the intentional termination of an individual’s life by the use of a lethal dose of medication administration (Woods and Bickley 14). There is also the aspect of non-voluntary euthanasia that results from almost similar processes, however, it does not account for the consent of the patient suffering pain. On the other hand, physician-assisted suicide involves the action where the physician provides advice through which the patient can self-administer for the purposes of ending his life. The debate surrounding the use of euthanasia often elicit strong emotions and the inadequate definitions on the same term attempts to conceal the real meaning from, therefore, numerous attempt to obtain a clear consensus from the community. The majority of the advocates have tried to make it difficult by bracketing euthanasia alongside other acceptable life-ending practices for the purposes of gaining support from the public (Banović et al., 173).
However, the definitions should be made clear for the purposes of public understanding. The word euthanasia originates from a Greek term that generally means “good death”. There is a claim from different dimensions citing the advantage of euthanasia as bringing about a good death, however, the question on what constitutes good death is still a dilemma and open for debate. Euthanasia can be defined as the action undertaken by the doctor whereby he intentionally contributes to the ending of a person’s life through the administration of drugs upon voluntary consent of the individual for compassionate reasons. Argumentatively, some terms should not be applicable especially when referring to euthanasia, such terms include active or passive as well as voluntary or involuntary since the terms seem ambiguous as well as confusing. In the world of medicine, there is no such a term as involuntary euthanasia, this seems contradictory. This is since the act of killing an individual without their consent should not be concealed under euthanasia; instead, it should be referred to as murder. At the same time, it is important to provide details concerning what euthanasia does not represent such as withdrawal of treatment as well as management of symptoms towards the end of life (Fulmer).
Many patients undergo pain and suffering at the point of death that at times makes them be treated without dignity or rather making the patients experience spiritual disorders. This should not be considered as an individual experience, therefore, looking for better solutions seem the only way out. Such perspective drives the convincing concept of the legalization of euthanasia. Despite the many debates, there are no justifications whatsoever that support the ending of a human being under any circumstances. The teachings of the Roman Catholic Church concerning euthanasia consider it a grave crime against life provided by God. The same sentiments and attitudes are shared by the Evangelical churches. Generally, the concept of suffering is not only a medical concern but also extends beyond physical pain. The influence comes from different factors that can be psychological, cultural, or spiritual. The major res...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These MLA Essay Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!