Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
3 pages/β‰ˆ825 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
MLA
Subject:
Creative Writing
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 10.8
Topic:

Should controversial speakers be allowed to speak on college campuses?

Essay Instructions:

[Introduction: Ask a wisdom question, and situate the question in the context of a larger family of issues. You may comment on the significance of the question for you. State your thesis as a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer to the question.]
Should controversial speakers be allowed to speak on college campuses?
Thesis: I will specifically be arguing for why controversial speakers should be allowed to speak on college campuses in order to make students feel uncomfortable not unsafe.
Point: Students can grow when they are uncomfotable however the line is crissed when they are unsafe.
-Yes

1. They say _____. [Be sure to make what they say clear; i.e., explain the key terms, give examples, etc. This will require you to elaborate more fully on the topic you’ve introduced. Also give some sense (ideally a valid argument) about why they say it. Citations would be most appropriate in this section, though they are not required.]
2. But against this, I say _____. [Be sure to make what you say clear, too; and note any underlying disagreements in the way you and they are understanding the topic. Also give reasons for what you say. An explicitly formulated valid argument is required here. Explain briefly what makes the argument is valid, using the logical concepts we have learned. A formal analysis of the argument may be appended.]
3. They might object that ______. [Which premise of your argument would they reject? This section should challenge the truth of one of your own premises. You should note the logical form of the disputed premise (is it a conditional or a disjunction or a negative universal or what), and say under what conditions a premise of that form is false. Then explain why they deny the truth of your premise.]
4. But I reply, ______. [Why do you assess the truth of the controverted premise differently than they do? What does their objection do to your argument? Is a modification of the argument in order? If so, what does the revised version of the argument look like?]

[Conclusion: This should explicitly rehearse the four main movements or “sentences” of the paper. No new content.]

Essay Sample Content Preview:
Student Name
Course
Instructor
Date
Should Controversial Speakers be allowed to Speak on College Campuses?
The controversy surrounding whether or not colleges and universities should allow controversial guest speakers on campus is not something new. Individuals have debated about the tensions arising between upholding free speech and maintaining equality. It is critical to appreciate that a majority of college students in American attend public schools that are funded by the government, hence, the First Amendment is mandatory in particular institutions. However, the invitation of controversial speakers has often led to protests from a section of students. Some have found some of the remarks from these speakers offensive. This has intensified calls to prevent such speakers from passing their views across campuses. Despite these calls, I believe that controversial speakers should be allowed to speak on campuses so that they can make the learners uncomfortable, not safe.
They say that inviting controversial speakers is costly to the institutions. In this case, the term “cost” means a wide range of potential costs that arise from the diminishing of the participation of the learners. Supporters of this argument believe that controversial speakers may lead to a section of students to feel wrongly targeted (Ross). As a result, such students may not participate fully in the learning process. Additionally, the proponents also argue that institutions spend money on enhancing the reputation of such speakers. Hence, the money could be used in other productive activities that enhance inclusivity in the institutions. At the same time, some people feel that hateful speech should not be allowed in institutions of higher learning. Colleges and universities being places where diverse students meet, it is argued that these institutions should be at the forefront of promoting tolerance.
But against this I say, colleges and institutions should be on the fore-front to protect the freedom of speech and expression. Students need to understand the critical role speech has played in the advancement of rights and equality in the U.S. for example, we would not be having the Nineteenth Amendment, which allowed women to vote. Without women’s suffrage movement and the widespread demonstrations, it would have been impossible for women to enjoy this right today. This demonstrates the need to allow different perspectives for the advancement of society.
They may object that while institutions have the duty to uphold the freedom of speech and expression, hate speech causes more harm. They may cite recent demonstrations where students have openly expressed their dissatisfaction with particular controversial speakers. For instance, in 2017, a far right-wing speaker Milo Yiannapoulos was scheduled to speak at UC Berkeley. However, the meeting was met with protests f...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These MLA Essay Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now