Project Family Violence Website Health, Medicine, Nursing Essay

Family Violence Website
Student’s Name
Name of the Class
Professor’s Name
City
State
Date
Family Violence Website
Family violence is a societal aspect that has received much attention from several concerned stakeholders. The list ranges from individuals, communal groups, non-governmental organizations, corporations and extends to governmental agencies. The heightened level of attention is predicated on the essence of the family institution as an integral element to the growth and well-being of the entire community. Family violence denotes “all forms of abuse that occur in familial relationships, whether it be physical, sexual, financial or economic, emotional or psychological, verbal, spiritual or involves the neglect of someone’s needs” (Tyysak & Saran, 2013, p. 2). Various sources have been used in the dissemination of related information including blogs, websites, journals, and books.
Internet sources have by far been the greatest tool to gather information on this topic. It is very easy to put anything on the internet considering that all one needs is a laptop. This position implies that much of the content is neither approved nor evaluated before being laid into the public arena. Nevertheless, the quality of the information extracted depends significantly on set precise criteria. Many blogs and websites have many unproved and unsubstantiated data meaning that they cannot be relied upon when making critical decisions. However, governmental websites appear to pass the criteria of analysis more often than not. The CARS (Credibility, Accuracy, Reasonableness, and Support) Checklist was formulated to help investigators in evaluating information sources and thus, will be used to ascertain the quality of information on the Canadian government’s Department of Justice website concerning family violence.
CARS Checklist
Credibility
Credibility is based upon the authenticity and reliability of the information thereof and it this aspect that enables the making of crucial decisions. Credibility facilitates the believability of the data to guarantee that one never makes an inaccurate decision. There are a couple of indicators that reflect the credibility of the source including the author’s control and evidence of quality control. First, there is the case for the author’s credentials, which is congruent with the level of training and education they have in the specific field (University of Wolverhampton, 2018). In this regard, the researcher will be keen to search for the author’s position of employment, title, or degree. However, in this specific case study, it is difficult to ascertain the author’s credentials because the information is from a governmental agency. Thus, credibility is determined from the angle of whether the reporting organization is a respected body. This criterion implies that the site bears much credibility because it represents the findings of the country’s Department of Justice. It is very much unlikely to find a government agency that reports unauthentic information.
Evidence of quality control provides the researcher with the mechanisms that the author used in attaining their information. In ordinary circumstances...