Partnering With Consumers: Resource Critique Health, Medicine Essay

Additional files to be uploaded.
This paper is part 2 of my Assessment task 1/Pre-requisites for person-centered care- Reflective Paper which I have provided you a copy. They must be related to each other.
I will provide with more documents that will help you with your writing.

CNA340: Developing professional nursing practice Semester one 2019

Partnering with Consumers: resource critique

Please note: The sections shaded grey are for your information only and can be deleted for final submission- leaving only the headings.   You are only required to type into the white sections. Word counts are suggested (please delete instructions for final submission).

CNA340 Partnering with Consumers (60%) Assessment Criteria HD DN CR PP NN Demonstrates a clear understanding of the importance of partnering with consumers and its influence on patient outcomes. 20% Demonstrates a high-level understanding of partnering with consumers and comprehensively details the influence it has on patient outcomes. Accurate application of knowledge regarding partnering with consumers with clear links as to how it can influence patient outcomes Accurate application of knowledge of partnering with consumers with some links to how it can influence patient outcomes. Whilst some scope for more depth, information provided is relevant, accurate and above satisfactory. Mostly accurate application of knowledge around partnering with consumers that demonstrates a satisfactory understanding. Some reference provided around its influence on patient outcomes. Scope for further exploration. Provides insufficient and/or confused knowledge regarding the concept and intent of partnering with consumers and/or provides little evidence of understanding of its influence on patient outcomes. Provides an informative critique of the clinician resources associated with the selected action. 40% (note: this section relates the first two questions on page 5-6 of the assessment resource. Provides an exceptional level of critique of the chosen clinician resources that demonstrates a wellrounded understanding of its intent, how it’s implemented and how it relates to the selected action that is substantiated strongly with scholarly literature. Provides an excellent level of critique that provides a clear overview of the clinician resource and its relationship with the selected action that is well substantiated with scholarly literature. Provides a solid overview of the clinician resource and its relationship to the selected action that is adequately supported by the scholarly literature but could be further substantiated. Provides a satisfactory overview of the clinician resource and how it relates to the selected action that demonstrates some evidence of critique that is supported by scholarly literature. However, scope for some additional depth No resource provided or Clinician resource chosen is not clearly identified/explored. or Critique provided does not clearly align with the selected action. Demonstrates the ability to reflect on own professional practice and to inform future nursing practice 15% Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of reflective practice that details clear, relevant future nursing practice considerations in the context of the selected action. Demonstrates a strong understanding of the application reflective practice to future nursing practice with sound description of future nursing practice considerations that are in context to the selected action. Demonstrates a satisfactory approach to reflective practice that details some considerations for future nursing practice but with scope for additional detail. Satisfactory alignment with the the selected action. Demonstrates elements for reflective practice with some considerations for future practice explored. However, scope for more depth and/or alignment with the the selected action. Demonstrates a poor understanding of the application of reflective practice and considerations for future practice And/or reflections provided do not clearly link with the selected action. literature to Uses appropriate scholarly substantiate findings throughout. Uses 15% Harvard referencing style. evidence arguments that considers substantiates thinking and literature that appropriate academic Outstanding use of style. sources using the Harvard Accurately references all -based practice relevant to the case. evidence discussion that include expands upon key points of Uses scholarly literature and the Harvard style. majority of sources using Accurately references the -based practice. Accurately references the scope to expand further. scholarly literature, but Uses some relevant the Harvard style. majority of sources using referencing style. Errors evident in evidence. consider additional discussion, but scope to literature to substantiate Draws upon some scholarly findings. literature to substantiate appropriate scholarly No or minimal use of style. inconsistent referencing Inaccurate and/or 10% coherent. succinct, logical and academic style that is Writes in a clear and concise spelling/grammar errors. with minimal or no clear and fluent manner consistently expressed in a balanced and is logical, insightful and The paper is exceptionally evidence of planning. writing style with strong highly evolved academic Communicates with a spelling/grammar errors. Minimal manner. a logical and fluent planning, and presented in style with clear evidence of strong academic writing Communicates with a style with mostly academic writing Communicates with a some evidence of planning. Generally paper. that impact on flow of spelling/grammar errors Evidence of fluent manner. expressed in a clear and scope for improvem coherent and clear but has reasonably writing style that is Communicates with a basic ent in impact on flow of paper. Errors in spelling/grammar convention. line with academic impact on readability. errors which significantly Multiple spelling/grammar academic manner. Not presented in an