Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
5 pages/≈1375 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
Chicago
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 21.6
Topic:

Philosophy of metaphysics. Social Sciences Essay.

Essay Instructions:

Explain carefully the difference between Presentism, Eternalism and the Growing Block.
Explain which view you prefer. Explain why the arguments for the view you prefer are most
persuasive OR explain why the arguments for the views are so well balanced that you do not have
a preferred view.
You may answer any of the above questions, but you MUST research for yourself a relevant recent journal article and include in your essay some kind of evaluation of that article and how it helps answer the question. It may help answer the questions EITHER by being a piece that you aregue against or by providing solutions you agee with and defend.

(Read, “Time” in The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy —
access via the library at http://plato(dot)stanford(dot)edu (Links to an external site.))

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Philosophy of Metaphysics
Name:
Course:
Date:
Philosophy of Metaphysics
The theories of presentism, eternalism, and growing-block depict what 'exists' in the world. Exist is restrictedly used and implies something different. The doctrine of presentism roots from actualism and emphasizes on everything present as being true. Presentism has both the ontological and dynamical view, where the first implies that things only exist in the moment (Cameron, 2016). The dynamical view is that what is in the moment is bound to change from time to time: this implies that if at all anything did exist, then they existed in that given time. This means that when they existed, they were present at that given time. The belief is that these objects or events existed as analogs just as they exist in other places.
For the eternalists, the past, present, and future objects or events all exist. They believe that these objects or events do exist as analogs the same as the objects existing in other places. This implies that if Morocco exists today though in a different continent at this present time, then dinosaurs exist though not now in 2020. For eternalists, events are placed on somewhat some space-time; they appear in different orders which can never be altered. The world is static in the following aspects; first, the happenings in the world do not change, and no movement of the present. They embrace the B-theory of time, which perceives the world as a static block of events where there is the past, present, and future simultaneously.
Eternalism, which mentions that both preceding and future are with humanity, shows that things in the past and the future both exist contrary to presentism, which denied every claim that there is anything in the past or the future. Contrary to the externalism theorists, no timeless or abstract things exists in presentism. For the growing block theorists, what exists are the things in the past and present but not what is in the future (Forbes, 2016). Presentism does not acknowledge the fact that reality is not a static thing, with time surely passing.
Contrary to their opinion, the reality takes different dynamics, going beyond what presentists advocate. Certain things and people existed in the past but not present today and today are no longer present and that some things and persons that are there today might not be there anymore in the future. Presentism presents the idea that present things change over some duration. This could be understood as a temporal change though time passes as these changes occur (Cameron, 2016). In 1986, Robert Adams first mentioned presentism in writing, described it as an analogy with actualism. This ontological doctrine focuses on what exists currently without any restriction from anything.
There is a great variance between the B-theory of the eternalists and the A-theory of the presentists in the sense that there are both the properties of past, current, and future where these different events are experienced at different times. Hence, those who endorse the B-theory are, in one way or another opposing the dynamic thesis while the endorsers of the A-theory are supporters of the dynamic thesis (Cameron, 2016). The growing block, however, lies in the middle of presentism an...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to scientific essays:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!