Captains of Industry versus Robber Barons

"Captains of Industry" versus "Robber Barons"
Name:
Course:
Tutor:
Date:
"Captains of Industry" versus "Robber Barons"
America's Gilded Age, which comprised most of the latter half of the 19th century, saw impressive economic expansion and industrial development. The period was marked by a laissez-faire government that did not interfere in transactions between private parties. Very few regulations surrounding wealth and business practices existed. In an age of such significant expansion and limited government intervention, a class of extremely wealthy business leaders comprised a tiny proportion of society. This group of industrialists and financiers had the power to control the market and policymaking while giving little or no attention to workers' rights issues such as low wages, poor workplace safety, and discrimination. Their vast wealth often underlined the period's financial inequality alongside broader social issues affecting the lower and middle class. As such, the wealthy elite was either termed as "Robber Barons" or "Captains of the Industry." While the former was a negative connotation and the latter often reserved for philanthropists, most business magnates cannot be categorized into any group. They were dishonest and unfair in their business practices, yet their entrepreneurial culture led to improved living standards for everyone. This essay posits that the Gilded Age's leading industrialists cannot be classified as either "Robber Barons" or "Captains of Industry" but as entrepreneurs.
"Robber Barons" referred to wealthy and powerful American industrialist and financiers who employed exploitative practices to build their wealth such as by forming trust to monopolize huge industries, exploiting workers, participating in unscrupulous business practices, and influencing high levels of government. On the other hand, "Captains of Industry" referred to business leaders whose ways of amassing personal fortune contributed positively to the nation through job creation, expansion of markets, or philanthropy acts. Most industrialists and financiers of the Gilded Age can be described as both "Robber Barons" and "Captains of Industry." However, some were known more for their less honorable deeds than their charitable acts and vice versa. These include business magnates like John D. Rockefeller, Cornelius Vanderbilt, Andrew Mello, Henry Ford, Andrew Mello, and Andrew Carnegie. The concept of laissez-faire capitalism imposed few impediments to creating monopolies, influencing politicians, exploiting workers, or engaging in shady stock trading practices, and even such philanthropic industrialists as Andrew Carnegie or Henry Ford can be termed as "Robber Barons" even though their hard work and entrepreneurial spirit are what made them successful.
A chief complaint against the "Robber Barons" of the Gilded Age was their monopolistic practices. Many of the business leaders of the period such as James J. Hill, Cornelius Vanderbilt, Henry Ford, John D. Rockefeller, and Andrew Carnegie amassed great wealth because of the complete control they held over markets. Besides their monopoly, their wealth was also earned through political entrepreneurship...