Architecture of Deceit by Diane Ghirardo (Essay Sample)
Prepare yourself to read the assigned texts by familiarizing yourself with each author (who was this person? What is he/shefamous for?). Notice the date when each one of your texts was published (is the author likely to provide a “current” or an “old”take on the problem he/she discusses?), and reflect on this reading’s location within the course—(“why would we be asked to readthis text in the first week, or in the context of this week’s particular topic”? Is the instructor likely assigning the text as a provider of“background” information, or is there some crucial new idea, argument, or position that I need to be able to identify?) A suggestionhere—always check what the week’s topic is before you start reading, so you know what kind of ideas or arguments to look for inthe text.SECOND TRICK:Try to figure out if this text constitutes a primary source (a document that expresses the author’s impressions or perspectives on anissue, typically written during the historical moment that is being examined in class) or a secondary source (a work that analyzesthe information contained or the views expressed in primary sources and often situates them in their historical or intellectual context).By doing this, you’ll know whether you need to read the text as a historical document or as an interpretation provided by others at alater time. Also: notice the title of the article assigned, and examine the word choices that the author makes—do the titles hint atsome interesting argument that challenges or supports other texts we’ve read in class? Are there any terms that you might want tolook for and define as you read?source..
Rhetorical analysis: Architecture of Deceit by Diane Ghirardo
Diane Ghirardo in the article ‘Architecture of Deceit’, published in the year 1984, argues that architecture hides behind the pretense that is not driven by the political, social and cultural shifts in the society at any given time. Architects strive to set apart their skills as an art from the fact that it is a trade much like other professions.Ghirardo, backs his claim by referring to the various pretexts used in architecture to preserve it as a subtle element, disguised as art, rendering feelings, as a fashion statement and then offers the critics simplifyand the evasive maneuverability involved. Ghirardo’s purpose it to prove that all the ornamental attributes that are used to set arch...
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
- Mary McLeod's Article Everyday and Other SpacesDescription: Mary McLeod’s article, “Everyday and ‘Other’ Spaces (1996), argues that the concept of “otherness” or “other” is among the fundamental preoccupations of the contemporary architecture...1 page/≈275 words | No Sources | Chicago | Visual & Performing Arts | Essay |
- Making Deconstruction or Cow Was the Show by Catherine IngrahamDescription: Catherine Ingraham’s article “Making deconstruction or cow was the show” seeks to clarify the aspects that differentiate deconstruction form deconstructivism...1 page/≈275 words | No Sources | Chicago | Visual & Performing Arts | Essay |
- Architecture and transgression by Bernard TschumiDescription: In “Architecture and transgression” (1976) Bernard Tschumi argues that transgressing the normal set limits allows architects to explore the phenomenon of the spatial axis...1 page/≈275 words | No Sources | Chicago | Visual & Performing Arts | Essay |