Textual Comparison. Chandran Kukathas and Matthias Risse. Social Essay (Essay Sample)
Chandran Kukathas and Matthias Risse both argue in favour of relatively free immigration, while Gillian Brock and Mills et al. seem to argue for ending or reducing the immigration of health workers from poor to rich countries. Compare and contrast a) Risse’s justification for free immigration, b) Kukathas’s justification for free immigration, and c) the justification in Brock and Mills et al for restricted immigration.
The structure of the essay should be as follows:
iii) A brief synopsis of the views expressed in the texts you have chosen
iv) Discussion of the precise ways in which texts referred to in the essay question differ from one another in their reasoning.
v) Conclusion: a statement (following from the discussion given under iv)) as to whether the texts are mutually complementary or contradictory in their message.
(i) Kukathas, C. (2005). ‘The case for open immigration’, in A. Cohen and C. Heath Wellman (eds.). Contemporary Debatess in Applied Ethics (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 207-220.
(ii) Risse, M. (2008). ‘On the morality of immigration’, Ethics and International Affairs 22 (1), pp. 25-33.
(i) Brock, G. (2011). ‘Compatriot priority, health in developing countries, and our global responsibilities’, in A.
Banai, M. Ronzoni and C. Schemmel (eds.) Social Justice, Global Dynamics (London: Routledge), pp. 117-132.
(ii) Mills, E. et alii (2008). ‘Should active recruitment of health workers from sub-Saharan Africa be viewed as a crime?’ The Lancet vol. 371 (issue 9613), pp. 685-88.
In this paper, I will be discussing the views and standpoints of four authors on immigration. There will be no expression of personal views and thoughts throughout the paper, as the focus will remain on the cases M. Risse, C. Kukathas, E, J, Mills, and G. Brock have presented to back their views.
Mathias Risse on Free Immigration
Mathias Risse rolls out the aspect of humanity while looking at the immigration policy, thinking that this world belongs to humans and that everyone should be given the right to move here and there. According to him, we only deem how this thing (immigration) is good for us (country) and debates on immigration policies (Risse, 2008). He oversees the idea of global justice.
Mathias Risse admits that if a state sees immigration policies only through the glass of humanity, it will not be able to meet its targets economically and politically. However, it is totally understandable that the state can be committed toward achieving certain goals for overall prosperity or it would not be able to keep the culture and traditions in their true shape. With what has been just said, it is also true that thinking in this way only shows self-interest.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to immigration:
- History Paper: Chinese Exclusion ActDescription: The Chinese Exclusion Act was considered the first law that significantly restricted immigration into the US of an ethnic group. The Act was signed in 1882 by president Chester Arthur after being passed by the congress....2 pages/≈550 words | No Sources | MLA | History | Essay |
- Historic Vs. ContemporaryDescription: This paper examines Barack Obama’s views about immigration in a news conference he held in 2005. Immigration has been a significant issue in the United States over the past few decades, and economic issues mainly cause it....3 pages/≈825 words | 3 Sources | MLA | History | Essay |
- The Wall: Arguing a Claim of PolicyDescription: This paper is therefore aimed at discussing policy documents in support and in objection of the wall policy, as well as providing an explanation based on the needs of the affected people....3 pages/≈825 words | 2 Sources | MLA | Creative Writing | Essay |