Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
5 pages/≈1375 words
Sources:
7 Sources
Level:
APA
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 21.6
Topic:

MODR 1760M Reasoning about Morality and Value. Social Sciences Essay (Essay Sample)

Instructions:

This assignment combines the techniques and skills you have learned in this class. It consists of two fundamental parts, argument analysis and argument evaluation. In your argument analysis, you are expected to provide an exposition/explanation of the author’s argument as much as possible in your own words. The explanatory portion of your paper should be based on a standardization/outline of the author’s argument. The second part of your paper requires you to critically evaluate the author’s argument/s. Here you can draw on any of the relevant critical techniques we’ve developed in the course plus your own argument skills.
The evaluative portion of your paper should also be based on your own standardization of your argument for or against the author’s position.
Both the standardization of the author’s argument and your standardization of your own argument should be appended to your 1500 word essay. Your paper should be typed, double spaced. This is not a research paper, thus there is no need to consult any secondary sources, either on the internet or in the Library. However, if you do access any sources to help you with this assignment (apart from your textbook) you must properly acknowledge that assistance and properly cite the source.

MODR 1760MReasoning about Morality and Value
FINAL TAKE HOME EXAM PROF. J.A. ALLEN
OBJECTIVE: Produce a polished 1250-1500 word critical summary/position paper on one of the following three articles and topics:
1. “Deterrence”, David M. Paciocco, The Power of Critical Thinking. 3rd. Lewis Vaughn and Chris MacDonaldor 2. “Yes, Human Cloning Should be Permitted,” Chris MacDonald, The Power of Critical Thinking. 3rd.   Lewis Vaughn and Chris MacDonaldor 3. “Marine Parks”, Bill Daly The Power of Critical Thinking. 3rd.   Lewis Vaughn and Chris MacDonald
   DEADLINE:   Electronic submission to turnitin.com between between Thursday April 4th & Thursday April 11th 
This assignment combines the techniques and skills you have learned in this class.   It consists of two fundamental parts, argument analysis and argument evaluation.   In your argument analysis, you are expected to provide an exposition/explanation of the author’s argument as much as possible in your own words.   The explanatory portion of your paper should be based on a standardization/outline of the author’s argument.   The second part of your paper requires you to critically evaluate the author’s argument/s.   Here you can draw on any of the relevant critical techniques we’ve developed in the course plus your own argument skills.The evaluative portion of your paper should also be based on your own standardization of your argument for or against the author’s position.
Both the standardization of the author’s argument and your standardization of your own argument should be appended to your 1500 word essay.   Your paper should be typed, double spaced.   This is not a research paper, thus there is no need to consult any secondary sources, either on the internet or in the Library.   However, if you do access any sources to help you with this assignment (apart from your textbook) you must properly acknowledge that assistance and properly cite the source.
This is an individual take home exam.   Do not work with others on this assignment.
Roughly, completing this assignment will involve the following steps,
Step One: Carefully read the passage/article and clarify it.   Initially you should skim for meaning, purpose and the overall conclusion.   Subsequently read each paragraph carefully for the details.   Note any terms, phrases or claims that require clarification or definition.
Step Two: Portray the Argument Structure.   State the main conclusion, formulate the Main Argument and Write a brief synopsis.   Outline any subarguments.   You may use either Method One or Method Two to standardize the author’s argument.   Name the lines of argument associated with each subargument.   Supply any missing premises and identify any assumptions or presuppositions the author is making.
Step Three: Assess the Individual Arguments for Logical Adequacy.   Are there any fallacies? What type of argument does the author present? Use the critical techniques associated with that type of argument.   Assess the overall argument.   Are there other arguments that support the same conclusion? Are there other arguments that support an opposite conclusion?   What are the implications of the author’s argument?   Are these implications acceptable or unacceptable.
Step Four: Organize your evaluative comments and arguments in an outline or standardization.
Step Five: Present your assessment.   This is the essay portion of your assignment.   Your essay should identify and explain the main argument and subarguments   in the article.   Give your overall assessment of the passage, preferably in one sentence. In effect, this is your conclusion about the passage.   Make your case to support your assessment by identifying clearly the structure of the argument you are critiquing.   Identify the strengths and weaknesses of the argument in a systematic manner.   Provide reasons to justify your analysis.   Consider and identify possible counter arguments to the author’s position.   Conclude by providing your overall assessment, possibly together with observations on how the argument could be improved.
Step Six: Carefully proof read and polish your prose.   Look for ways to state claims as clearly and directly as possible.   Look for ways to shorten word count, allowing more space to develop your assessment.   When you are satisfied with your critical summary, print a copy for class   and submit to turnitin.com electronically.
REMEMBER TO HAVE FUN.....THINKING AND WRITING IS ENJOYABLE WHEN DONE WELL.

source..
Content:


Reasoning About Morality and Value
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
“Yes, Human Cloning Should Be Permitted”- Analysis
Introduction
The article presents the author’s argument, Chris MacDonald, concerning permitting human cloning, counteracting Patricia Baird’s argument on discouraging human cloning. The author argues that there is no convincing evidence that cloning among human being should be prohibited. According to Chris, abolishing human cloning is being single-minded. He feels there are a lot of factors to consider before making a final decision on either banning or permitting human cloning. Supporting permission to human cloning is well defended with reasonable truth which one needs to consider in favor of the involved parties.

...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to scientific essays:

  • Answer The 8 Questions About Politics Social Sciences Coursework
    Description: Participatory budgeting is a process in which citizens are involved in the allocation of part of public funds through deliberation and decision-making (Gilman, 2016). As such, governments can choose this process so as to circumvent various challenges such as reducing citizens’ distrust...
    3 pages/≈825 words | 1 Source | Other | Social Sciences | Coursework |
  • Energy Drinks and Health Risks. Social Sciences Research Paper
    Description: Energy drinks are seen to overcome tiredness by improving the energy levels in the body. The drinks contain large quantities of sugar, caffeine, vitamins, taurine or other ingredients considered stimulants. However, most people and studies claim that the use of the drinks may pose serious health problems...
    4 pages/≈1100 words | 4 Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Research Paper |
  • President Trump’s 2019 Speech to Congress. Social Sciences Essay
    Description: President Trump’s Speech during the State of the Union address highlighted more on his policies more than his success. The function of the state of the union address to congress is to give recommendations on policies rather than statistics on success factor. Some of the policies and recommendations...
    1 page/≈275 words | 1 Source | APA | Social Sciences | Essay |
Need a Plagiarism Free Essay?
Submit your instructions!