Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
4 pages/≈1100 words
Sources:
2 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 17.28
Topic:

Moral Theories: Deontological and Utilitarianism Theories

Essay Instructions:

In this session, you have been considering moral-ethical dilemmas you yourself faced or that you know of that you either resolved or failed to resolve, but hopefully learned from. You may never have given much thought to ethical theory nor what ethical premises/paradigms you have unconsciously held.
You will be focusing on this case for this assignment:
Jane Doe is a nursing student at University X. Jane is in week eight of a course entitled: "Introduction to Ethics".
For the week one discussion, Jane copied work done by her friend John Doe in the same class two months ago (with a different professor). John told Jane it was okay to use his work as John's professor never checked any work in the class using Turnitin.com. John claimed to have earned an A on the work also.
In week two, Jane went to StudentPapering.com and paid ten dollars for a week two essay done by a student (not John Doe) who took the same course four months ago. StudentPapering promises that all its archived work is of excellent quality and cannot be detected as copied. Jane then uploaded an exact copy of the work for the week two assignment.
In week three, Jane paid a worker at PaperingStudent.com ten dollars to write for Jane a brand new essay after Jane shared with the worker the essay assignment instructions.
In week four, Jane relied on her knowledge of Esperanto. She felt pressed for time and found an article by a professor from Esperanto on the week four topic. She translated Esperanto into English using Moogle Translate, and the translated text served as her week four paper.
In week five, Jane was running late again. Jane purposely uploaded a blank paper hoping that she would later claim it was an innocent mistake and not be assessed a late penalty. In a previous course on History, she had done the same (with an earlier paper from the History class rather than simply a blank) and had not seen any late penalty assessed.
In week six, Jane took work she did in a nursing course from a year ago and submitted that for her discussion posting in her current class. She simply copied and pasted the work she had labored intensively on a year ago (even though University X forbids this practice as 'self-plagiarism'). Jane was confident her Nursing instructor never checked that work using Turnitin.com or another method.
In week seven, Jane copied and pasted work found on website.com for the paper. Jane did not use any quotation marks or other documentation to show the text was not by Jane.
Since Jane's Ethics professor did not check papers and posting for any issues by using Turnitin.com or another method, the professor graded all of Jane's work unaware of Jane's actions throughout the weeks of the class. Jane feels her actions are morally justified both because her economic situation requires her to work too much to devote time to school (although other students are well-off enough to have such time) and her religion forbids cheating, but Jane ignores her religion's teachings.
For the written reflection, address Jane Doe's and respond to the following:
• Articulate again your moral theory from week eight discussion (You can revise it if you wish). What two ethical theories best apply to it? Why those two?
• Apply to Jane Doe's case your personal moral philosophy as developed in week eight discussion and now. Use it to determine if what Jane Doe did was ethical or unethical per your own moral philosophy.
• Consider if some of these examples are more grave instances of ethical transgressions than others. Explain.
• Propose a course of social action and a solution by using the ethics of egoism, utilitarianism, the "veil of ignorance" method, deontological principles, and/or a theory of justice to deal with students like Jane. Consider social values such as those concerning ways of life while appraising the interests of diverse populations (for instance, those of differing religions and economic status).
Requirements
Writing Requirements
• Length: 3-4 pages (not including title page or references page)
• 1-inch margins
• Double spaced
• 12-point Times New Roman font
• Title page
• References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources)

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Moral Theory
Students Name
University Affiliation
Course
Professor
Date
Moral Theory Case Analysis
Introduction
In most schools, students are not allowed to copy others' work. By definition, plagiarism is taking someone else’s work and failing to acknowledge it. This is considered wrong and a crime in most schools since such an individual disobeys the rules set by learning institutions. At the same time, one disrespects the professor or tutor who had given the assignment. In this paper, Jane started copying her friend’s work from the first week. She even paid a student ten dollars to write an essay since the student had done the same course a few months ago. To make matters, she copied and pasted or found on the website and failed to use quotations to show the text was not originally written by her. Ethically Jane was wrong since she plagiarized her. This paper will examine Jane Doe's behavior, the morality theories she violated, will provide an ethical evaluation of janes behavior, will analysis of the severity of the transgressions she committed, and the various course of social action that can be undertaken to curb the transgressions.
Applicable Moral Theories
The two most applicable moral theories are deontological theory and utilitarianism theory. According to deontological theory, people ought to behave in ways that are right and universally accepted as good behaviors (Koh & Reamer, 2021). Deontological theorists believe that human beings should always behave in ways that show respect to all people and in truthful ways. At the same time, actions that align with the rules set by a community or institutions like schools are ethical, and those that do not are not. Deontological theorists assert that humans should not use the consequential effect to justify their wrongful actions toward others. In our case scenario, Jane was respectful to other people since she used other people's work from various websites without their consent. While the internet has made learning easy, it has also led to increased cases of plagiarism among students. Most institutions, like the one Jane was schooling in, consider plagiarism a crime, so teachers use Turnitin to check the similarity index. If a student has directly copied work from the internet, one is supposed to use quotations and correct citations to acknowledge it is someone else’s work. These are rules Jane failed to follow, making her actions unethical.
Additionally, the utilitarianism theory applies to Janes's scenario. Utilitarianism theorists assert that humans should do universally right things for most people. This means that the right actions will bring happiness to people because happiness is the only thing with intrinsic value (Feess et al., 2022). Human actions should bring greater good to people. Janes's actions of copying other people's work were contrary to utilitarianism theory's recommendations since she was not concerned about the people; she copied the work from and fair assessment for the rest of the class. At the same time, her teacher was unhappy to discover Jane had started cheating from the first week. Further, Jane was unhappy in the long run because the school had to punish her for failing to obey the rules and regulat...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!