Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
4 pages/≈1100 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 17.28
Topic:

M422-C2: Management Biases. Social Sciences Essay.

Essay Instructions:

Even the most intelligent manager is prone to personal biases and pitfalls that can lead to bad decisions. We all carry biases based on our personal experiences. And we can all fall into various traps that lead to decisions that seem perfectly logical at the time but in retrospect, we see that we should have known better.
In the background materials, including Bolland and Fletcher (2012); Kourdi (2003); and Hammond, Keeney, and Raiffa (2008); several specific decision-making biases and pitfalls are discussed. Collectively these are known as cognitive biases. Some of the common pitfalls and biases discussed in these readings include overconfidence bias, confirmation (self-confirming) bias, sunk-cost bias, framing bias, and hindsight bias.
Carefully review all three of these readings and make sure you understand the different types of biases. Then read through the scenarios below and think about what kind of biases are demonstrated in each scenario. For each scenario, carefully explain which specific bias or biases is demonstrated by the decision and what can be done to avoid this bias in the future. Make sure to pick at least one specific bias that you read about for each scenario, and explain your reasoning. Use references to at least one of the three required readings from the background materials in your discussion of each scenario below. Your paper should be 4–5 pages in length:
The Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of a corporation is of the strong belief that marketing is not a good use of the company’s money. Someone shows her data from several years ago showing that during a period of high spending on marketing, sales did not go up. She says, “See, I told you marketing is not a good use of our budget!” and cuts the marketing budget to almost zero. Following the cut in the marketing budget, sales also start to drop dramatically. When asked by an employee if the drop in sales is due to the cut in the marketing budget, she says, “No!” and insists there must be a different explanation. What kind of decision-making bias do you think this represents, and why? What steps would you recommend to this CEO to reduce this kind of bias? Support your answer with references to at least one of the three background readings.
A CEO decides that he wants to greatly expand the company’s market by purchasing a major rival. This acquisition would double the company’s market share. However, several of his top managers warn him that such a purchase would require the company to take out a huge amount of debt to finance this merger, and that many of these large mergers have failed. They also point out that the organizational culture of the other company is very different and that managing this merger would be very difficult. Nonetheless, the CEO insists that he can overcome the odds and plans to go through with the merger. What kind of decision-making bias do you think this represents, and why? What steps should this leader take to avoid this bias? Support your answer with references to at least one of the three background readings.
A CEO wants to purchase a new factory. He is currently deciding between two factories. The owner of Factory A brags that 94% of products produced at the factory are free of defects. The owner of Factory B cautions that his factory has a 5% defect rate but management and staff are working very hard to reduce the rate. The CEO decides to purchase Factory A citing its strong 94% rate of success in producing defect-free products even though Factory B actually has a 95% rate of success. What kind of decision-making bias do you think this represents, and why? What steps should this leader take to avoid this bias?
A CEO of an automobile company decides to introduce a new hybrid vehicle using cutting-edge technology. A huge amount of money is spent in research and development as well as advertising. But when the car is completed sales are very slow and the price has to be cut so low that the company is losing money on every hybrid vehicle sold. She is advised to simply abandon the car to avoid further losses in profits, and focus her energy on selling profitable vehicles. However, she insists it is unwise to abandon the hybrid vehicle given that so much money has already been put into the project. What kind of decision-making bias do you think this represents, and why? What steps should this leader take to avoid this bias? Support your answer with references to at least one of the three background readings.
Conclude the paper with a discussion about which one of the decision-making biases you think is the most dangerous to a leader, and explain your reasoning.
Required Reading:
A good place to start is this short video that will give you an overview of decision making biases:
Lombardo, J. (2014). Common Biases and Judgment Errors in Decision Making Organizational Behavior. Education Portal https://www(dot)youtube(dot)com/watch?v=cAbdmV3VOwA
Now go through the following three readings to get a deeper understanding:
Bolland, E., & Fletcher, F. (2012). Solutions: Business problem solving. (Available from Trident Online Library. Read only the relevant chapters.)
Kourdi, J. (2011). Chapter 10: Avoiding the pitfalls and developing an action plan. Effective Decision Making: 10 Steps to Better Decision Making and Problem Solving. London: Marshall Cavendish International [Asia] Pte Ltd. [eBook Business Collection]
Hammond, J. S., Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1998). The hidden traps in decision-making. Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 47-58. [Business Source Complete]

Essay Sample Content Preview:

M422-C2: Management Biases
Student:
Institution Affiliation:
M422-C2: Management Biases
Acting in the position of a Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of an organization, it is required of them to close to zero flaws in terms of making decisions. Maintaining beyond zero flaws is paramount since some decisions might impact the company profoundly, leading to the dwindling of activities. In that case, a strong bias may have consequences of derailing the company and making it follow a dangerous path. In the underlying case, it is evident that the CFO is in a dilemma and bias. Marketing is very critical in any given organization. Hence, the company aims to do aggressive marketing campaigns, but the CFO is opposed to it since expenditures on marketing seems to be offsetting the company’s finances into negative. Also, marketing can be acting to consume a lot of finances and yet not profiting from the organization.
From the 4P’s of marketing (Product, Price, Place, and Promotion), all of them are critical for the company to succeed. In the case above, the information that the CFO had on marketing was outdated, leading then into a wrong decision. The biases manifested by the CFO seem to outweigh is the decision making process. The type of bias manifested in this case is anchoring bias. According to Kourdi (2003), an anchoring bias is protracted when a person is placed too much weight on information received regardless of researching the relevant information (Kourdi, 2003). The CFO made a decision based on outdated resources.
Consequently, the CFO cut budget allocated to marketing by far. Bollard and Fletcher (2012) also present confirmation bias as presented when one has a preexisting view and interprets information that can support the view. In the case, the CFO elected used an outdated source to prof the decision she had in mind and that it was the best decision to take (Bollard and Fletcher, 2012). The CFO is cocksure that limiting the budget allocated to the market has no significant effects on company sales. It could have been better if the CFO compiled new data to aid the company and herself into making a sound decision for the company’s marketing strategic plan and execute it.
Company Expansion
CEO’s are placed with a mighty decision since that act as technical officers alongside other essential roles in any organization. Consequently, the CEO aspires to grow a company to soar to greater heights and be on a competitive advantage with its competitors. The CEO has to factor the decision of expansion of the company based on Merging. Merging is vital to take advantage of the rival’s place as well as their clients. However, it is essential to note that Merging has profound impacts on the company since, among other factors, a company’s culture can act to be affected by the fact that different organizations use varied cultures. Also, as hinted by several managers, Merging would be costly, and it can drain the company’s finances. Therefore, the CEO has to consider all the effects of acquiring a rival company (Bollard and Fletcher, 2012). In the underlying cause, the CEO had issues that were manifested. In the first case, the CEO is overconfident, and this is a protracted trap (Hammond...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to scientific essays:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!