Empirical Evidence: Does Democracy Lower Inequality? (Essay Sample)
Throughout this course, we have explored different injustices and inequalities and how these can give rise to social movements. We have also looked at the different forms of society that have been predominant throughout the world in the last century: liberal capitalist vs. socialist economies, different forms of democratic governance vs. autocratic regimes, and autonomous self-rule vs. subjugation to colonial or imperial powers.
For this essay topic, answer the question: does democracy lower inequality? Provide anecdotal and empirical support for your answer—give examples of democratic societies as well as non-democratic societies, paying particular attention to societies that change their government form (those that become more democratic or less democratic, and those that change the way democracy is practiced); provide measures of inequality and injustice (or evidence of inequality declining) in these different societies; and make a clear and reasoned argument about the relationship between democracy and inequality. Be sure to be clear about any causal claims you make and that you support and explore these claims.
Refer to at least 3 different societies—both historical societies and more recent societies. Use your readings as a starting point; gather additional examples and empirical evidence by following references in the readings and by exploring reliable sources on the internet. Wikipedia is a good place to start, but do not cite Wikipedia without reference to the underlying support material used in the Wikipedia article! Consult the Liberal Studies librarian for help with research.
Essays should be between 1,000-1,200 words.source..
Does Democracy Lower Inequality?
Does Democracy Lower Inequality?
Hypothetically, it is naturally expected that democracy can reduce inequality, but this might not be the case, especially in societies where democracy is controlled by the wealthier population. Acemoglu, Johnson and Robinson (2001) say that there are numerous factors that cause huge differences in per capital income in numerous countries, and this makes it difficult for democracy to contribute to lower levels of inequality. Existing empirical literature indicate that is democracy leads to contradictory outcome depending on the approach deployed in the study. The impact of democracy on inequality tend to differ in different countries and this depends on the level of economic development as well as the policies that are implemented by the government. Since there are many types of inequalities, this paper will largely concentrate on income inequality since it is the most prevalent. This paper argues that democracy does not lower inequality and provides empirical evidence to support this claim.
Any market system is always influenced by a larger political system. The extent of the impact of this political system on the market system is determined by the laws and policies imposed by the political regime. The laws and policies enacted by a political system are determined by the distribution of power and an aggregation of institutional and the preferences of the mobilized interests (Abad, 2013). In a free market, there will always be winners and losers and this implies that it is not possible for everyone to be equal. The most skilled population will always end up with more compared to those who lack any particular skill or the semi-skilled. Consequently, in an increasingly global economy, inequality is bound to be present as the most educated professionals will get all the well-paying white-collar jobs while the less educated and unskilled population do the less attractive living wage jobs. As this trend continues, the gap between the rich and the poor, which is the inequality level tends to widen. Therefore, democracy cannot lower inequality as it is only one of the factors impacting on inequality. The strongest factor influencing inequality is the redistribution of wealth in a society.
According to Michael O'Sullivan who is the CIO for Credit Suisse, global wealth in Europe increased by 6.4% over the past decade thank to economic stability in the continent. The top ten nations in Europe which recorded the largest gains in absolute terms include France, Germany, Spain, and Italy, with Poland recording the largest gain of 18% (Davies, Lluberas, & Shorrocks, 2017). However, this does not imply that there is reduction in inequality since high property prices and market valuations may reduce the rate of economic growth in the future, taking into consideration that lower income holders fail to benefit from rapid economic growth.
The latest report published by Credit Suisse Research Institute indicated that the global wealth increased by 27% to $280 trillion compared to what it was ten years ago, increasing by 6.4% over the last 12 months (Davies, Lluberas, & Shorrocks, 2017). The United States is the leading country in terms of wealth gains and it has continued to perform well since the last global financial crisis. Furthermore, the Federal Reserve has played a key role in enabling employement to grow and the economy to flourish, but wealth inequity cont
- Diffusion in ResponsibilityDescription: Discuss whether there were any differences in behavior when many people were present and when few people were present...1 page/≈275 words | 1 Source | APA | Social Sciences | Essay |
- Stages of Reflective Judgment (RJM) Research PaperDescription: The reflective judgment model (RJM) is considered to be an epistemological model that analyses the perception of people towards knowledge ...3 pages/≈825 words | 3 Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Essay |
- Function of Crime: Whether Crime is Functional for SocietyDescription: An explanation of whether crime is functional for society or not, and explain why. Be specific and use examples to support your explanation....2 pages/≈550 words | 4 Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Essay |