Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
20 pages/≈5500 words
Sources:
15 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 86.4
Topic:

Compare and Contrast Major Legislation

Essay Instructions:
RESEARCH PAPER: COMPARE AND CONTRAST MAJOR LEGISLATION ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS OVERVIEW The purpose of this paper is to analyze, compare, and contrast various pieces of major legislation that relate to the global war on terror (i.e. the U.S.A. Patriot Act (USAPA), the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), etc.). Students will also discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each piece of legislation discussed. Finally, students will select a major piece of legislation and take a stance either in support or opposition of that legislation. Students will provide a cogent and academic argument to support their stance based upon sound, scholarly research. INSTRUCTIONS All papers must be completed through the lens of a Biblical Worldview where students will incorporate appropriate biblical passages and/or resources. The paper must be completed in APA formatting and consist of 20-25 pages (excluding all title, abstract and reference pages). In addition to the course text, all papers must utilize at least 15 outside scholarly sources to support evaluation an analysis. At a minimum, the following sections are required: • Introduction o Provide a brief introduction about the key elements in the paper. • Background and Problem Statement o Preliminary research must be conducted using practitioners, government sources, articles, etc., to identify and discuss the major pieces of legislation such as those listed above (The USA Patriot Act, The NDAA, etc.). o The thesis statement will discuss and describe the concepts cited and the significance of each as they relate to one another. The thesis statement must be clear and concise (approximately 250 words). • Literature Review o The literature review is a critical component of a proposal. This section highlights what has been achieved related to your topic. Answer the following questions:  What is the USA Patriot Act?  What is the NDAA?  What other pieces of legislation play a key role in prosecuting the global war on terror?  What role does the FISA court and process play?  What role has the NSA played within this process?  What technologies have been employed to further this legislation?  What role does indefinite detention play?  What is unlawful enemy combatant?  What aspects of the legislation is viewed as Constitutional?  What aspects of the legislation are brought into question with regards to the U.S. Constitution?  How has the legislation impacted American civil liberties?  What are the supporting arguments for the legislation?  What are the opposing arguments against the legislation?  How should the legislation be changed or amended?  What are the central themes and arguments in current literature?  What is missing from current literature? o Scholarly articles are required. Although some information from government sources may be used sparingly, approximately 80% of the review should incorporate recent scholarly articles (published within the last 10 years). o Do not state your opinion in this section. All information provided must be properly cited and must be from quality academic sources. To achieve this, use direct quotations, paraphrases, and synthesized information from multiple sources. For example, this statement synthesizes the opinions of 4 scholars: “Researchers have argued that disaster planning is critical to minimizing the negative effects for emergency responders (Brown, 2010; Caldwell, 2009; Moore, 2011; Stanley, 2008).” • Conclusion o Summarize your findings. What are the key points in the literature with regards to the selected piece of legislation and how it impacts both the U.S. efforts in the global war on terror? o Since passage, how has the legislation impacted the average American citizen’s civil liberties? o What steps should be taken to further improve the legislation? o What steps might be taken to reduce any potential encroachment on American civil liberties? o What type of response is needed moving forward? What or who should be engaged (e.g., the political community, military, federal law enforcement, local law enforcement citizens, etc.)? Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Essay Sample Content Preview:
Major Legislation on the Global War on Terror Student Name University Course Professor Name Date Major Legislation on the Global War on Terror The global war on terror entails international military campaigns that started after the September 11, 2001 (9/11) terror incident in the United States. The initiative involves a coalition led by the United States, comprising both NATO and non-NATO nations, in the campaigns to destroy al-Qaida and other extremist militant groups around the world. Since 9/11, the war on terror has become an organizing principle of America’s defense and foreign policy. The war on terror is unlike other wars, for example, the one against Iraq a decade earlier or the 1999 war over Kosovo. The rationale is that the war on terror often involves different levels of government and military involvement and collaborations among governments. It is a war whose focus keeps shifting and whose dynamics are subject to the conceptualizations of the concept of terror. It is also a war that does not seem to have an end. Central to the global war on terror are several legislations passed to support the government’s efforts to fight terrorism. For example, the USA Patriot Act (2001) expanded the surveillance powers of law enforcement agencies, while the Homeland Security Act (2002) created the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), whose role was to coordinate and unify efforts to protect the US from terrorist attacks. The National Defense Authorization Acts (NDAA) involve provisions that include measures related to counterterrorism operations, military spending, and detainee treatment. Besides the fundamental differences in the purpose, each of these legislations addresses specific aspects of the war on terrorism. This paper analyzes, compares, and contrasts major legislations relating to the global war on terror. The essay presents the issue’s background, followed by a critical review of the literature on the various aspects of these legislations. In short, the paper will critically discuss the NDAA, the USA Patriot Act, and other primary legislation. The essay also presents the role of the FISA court and processes, NSA, and technology. The literature will also cover a commentary on the constitutionality of the selected legislation– the USA Patriot Act (2011). Background and Problem Statement Since 9/11, the US has witnessed the emergence of a counterterrorism war paradigm established to expand the scope and discretion of the executive power. Various legislations have been enacted to support national security interests and anti-terror operational practices. For example, on September 14, 2001, Congress passed the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF). This legislation has been credited for what came to be a multi-continental “perma-war” (Hajjar, 2019). Other scholars believe that such legislation authorizing military use has worsened the situation, which is why the war on terror became a permanent war. For example, the elimination of the Taliban-governed Afghanistan, which was al-Qaida’s physical base, resulted in global jihadists dispersing into cities, making such cities more challenging to secure and govern (Stevenson, 2006). Other scholars believe that the global war on terror has become a post-Co...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to cold war: