Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
6 pages/≈1650 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Level:
APA
Subject:
Management
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 29.16
Topic:

ETHICS AND LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY ANALYSIS. Ethical Culture of Walmart. Management Essay (Essay Sample)

Instructions:

INTRODUCTION
As a leader in your organization, it is vital that you are familiar with the laws that regulate your industry. Sparked by the dramatic corporate and accounting scandals of Enron, Arthur Andersen, Adelphia, and WorldCom, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was implemented in 2002 in an effort to restore confidence in the stock markets. Sarbanes-Oxley represents the most important securities legislation since the original federal securities laws of the 1930s as it increased governmental regulation and oversight of publicly traded companies and established protections for whistleblowers. The False Claims Act and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act provide a financial incentive for those who blow the whistle to report fraudulent activity within their organization.
In this task, you will select and analyze an established company’s code of ethics, analyze how an employee would raise an ethical concern within an organization, and consider current laws with respect to whistle-blowers.
SCENARIO
You are an experienced ethics officer who has recently been hired by an established company. You have been tasked with analyzing the company’s current code of ethics and identifying areas in need of improvement.
REQUIREMENTS
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
Prepare a report (suggested length of 6–8 pages) in which you do the following:
A. Choose a company’s code of ethics from the Web Links section below and analyze that company’s code of ethics by doing the following:
1. Analyze how well the chosen company’s code of ethics covers the topic of corporate social responsibility (CSR).
2. Analyze how well the chosen company’s code of ethics covers the topic of compliance with legal mandates.
a. Describe the ramifications for an organization when it is noncompliant with legal mandates.
b. Describe two legal or ethical safeguards the chosen company has in place or could put in place to prevent illegal or unethical acts.
3. Analyze how well the chosen company’s code of ethics facilitates the development of an ethical culture.
4. Explain how an employee would raise an ethical concern in the chosen company and provide three resources available to employees to use when raising an ethical concern.
a. Discuss which resource(s) you would most likely use to report an ethical concern.
B. Develop a policy that instructs employees on how to address unethical conduct observed at work by doing the following:
1. Discuss personal and organizational factors an employee would need to consider as a last resort before deciding to blow the whistle about unethical conduct observed at work.
2. Describe the internal and external reporting steps an employee should follow if the employee decides to blow the whistle.
C. Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of whistle-blowers receiving payment from the government based on one of the following laws:
• False Claims Act
• Dodd–Frank Wall Street and Consumer Protection Act
D. Analyze how the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines have changed the way organizations operate.
1. Discuss three culpability factors that are used to determine fines under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines.
E. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
F. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
RUBRIC
A1:CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
NOT EVIDENT
An analysis of how well the chosen company’s code of ethics covers the topic of CSR is not provided.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The analysis of how well the chosen company’s code of ethics covers the topic of CSR is illogical, or the ideas presented are poorly supported.
COMPETENT
The analysis of how well the chosen company’s code of ethics covers the topic of CSR is logical, and the ideas presented are well supported.
A2:LEGAL MANDATE COMPLIANCE
NOT EVIDENT
An analysis of how well the chosen code of ethics covers the topic of compliance with legal mandates is not provided.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The analysis of how well the chosen company’s code of ethics covers the topic of compliance with legal mandates is illogical, or the ideas presented are poorly supported.
COMPETENT
The analysis of how well the chosen company’s code of ethics covers the topic of compliance with legal mandates is logical, and the ideas presented are well supported.
A2A:IMPLICATIONS OF NONCOMPLIANCE
NOT EVIDENT
A description of the ramifications for an organization when it is noncompliant with legal mandates is not provided.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The description of the ramifications for an organization when it is noncompliant with legal mandates is illogical, or the described ramifications are inaccurate or irrelevant to the legal mandates.
COMPETENT
The description of the ramifications for an organization when it is noncompliant with legal mandates is logical, and the described ramifications are accurate and relevant to the legal mandates.
A2B:LEGAL OR ETHICAL SAFEGUARDS
NOT EVIDENT
A description of 2 legal or ethical safeguards to prevent illegal or unethical acts is not provided.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The description of 1 or more of the 2 legal or ethical safeguards in place to prevent illegal or unethical acts does not contain sufficient detail or is illogical. Or 1 or more of the described safeguards is not relevant to the chosen company.
COMPETENT
The description of 2 legal or ethical safeguards in place at the chosen company to prevent illegal or unethical acts contains sufficient detail and is logical. Both safeguards described are relevant to the chosen company.
A3:DEVELOPMENT OF AN ETHICAL CULTURE
NOT EVIDENT
An analysis of how well the company’s code of ethics facilitates the development of an ethical culture is not provided.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The analysis of how well the chosen company’s code of ethics facilitates the development of an ethical culture is illogical, or the ideas presented are poorly supported.
COMPETENT
The analysis of how well the chosen company’s code of ethics facilitates the development of an ethical culture is logical, and the ideas presented are well supported.
A4:RAISING AN ETHICAL CONCERN
NOT EVIDENT
An explanation of how an employee would raise an ethical concern in the chosen company is not provided.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The explanation of how an employee would raise an ethical concern in the chosen company is illogical, or 1 or more of the 3 resources are not provided, or 1 or more of the resources are not likely to help an employee when raising a concern. Or the ideas presented are missing key details.
COMPETENT
The explanation of how an employee would raise an ethical concern in the chosen company is logical and includes all 3 resources available to employees and each resource will help the employee raise a concern. The ideas presented include key details.
A4A:PREFERRED RESOURCES
NOT EVIDENT
A discussion of which resource(s) the candidate would most likely use is not provided.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The discussion of which resource(s) the candidate would most likely use to report an ethical concern is poorly supported or is illogical.
COMPETENT
The discussion of which resource(s) the candidate would most likely use to report an ethical concern is well supported and logical.
B1:WHISTLE-BLOWING FACTORS
NOT EVIDENT
A discussion of personal and organizational factors that would need to be considered as a last resort before an employee blows the whistle about unethical conduct observed at work is not provided.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The discussion of personal and organizational factors that would need to be considered as a last resort before an employee blows the whistle about unethical conduct observed at work is illogical, or the ideas presented are poorly supported.
COMPETENT
The discussion of personal and organizational factors that would need to be considered as a last resort before an employee blows the whistle about unethical conduct observed at work is logical, and the ideas presented are well supported.
B2:WHISTLE-BLOWING PROCESS
NOT EVIDENT
A description of the internal and external reporting steps the employee should follow to blow the whistle is not provided.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The description of the internal and external reporting steps the employee should follow if the employee decides to blow the whistle is illogical or not plausible.
COMPETENT
The description of the internal and external reporting steps the employee should follow if the employee decides to blow the whistle is logical and plausible.
C:ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF PAYING WHISTLE-BLOWERS
NOT EVIDENT
An analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of whistle-blowers receiving payment from the government is not provided.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of whistle-blowers receiving payment from the government is illogical, is missing key details, or does not specifically reference 1 of the given laws.
COMPETENT
The analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of whistle-blowers receiving payment from the government is logical, contains key details, and specifically references 1 of the given laws.
D:IMPACT OF U.S. SENTENCING GUIDELINES
NOT EVIDENT
An analysis of how the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines have changed the way organizations operate is not provided.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The analysis of how the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines have changed the way organizations operate is missing key details or is illogical.
COMPETENT
The analysis of how the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines have changed the way organizations operate contains key details and is logical.
D1:CULPABILITY FACTORS
NOT EVIDENT
A discussion of 3 factors is not provided, or the discussion makes no reference to culpability factors that are used to determine fines under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The discussion of 3 culpability factors that are used to determine fines under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines is missing key details or contains some inaccuracies.
COMPETENT
The discussion is logical and accurately addresses 3 culpability factors that are used to determine fines under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines.
E:SOURCES
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not include both in-text citations and a reference list for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized, and a reference list; however, the citations and/or reference list is incomplete or inaccurate.
COMPETENT
The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that accurately identifies the author, date, title, and source location as available.
F:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION
NOT EVIDENT
Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective.
COMPETENT
Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.
WEB LINKS
PepsiCo - COE
Wells Fargo - COE
Synnex - COE
Comcast - COE
British Petroleum - COE
Walmart - COE
Target - COE
Mayo Clinic - COE
Kaiser Permanente - COE
Oracle - COE
Deloitte - COE

source..
Content:

ETHICAL CULTURE OF WALMART
Name
Course
Date
Ethical Culture of Walmart
Walmart Company revolves and works under three core ethical principles. These principles include respect for the individual, striving for excellence, and service to customers. Walmart Company has made all efforts to uphold respect for individuals; this has been possible through its strong commitment to diversity and avoiding discrimination at all costs. This has been evident in the fact that Walmart does not care about offering gay and lesbian products in their stores. The company does not make corporate contributions to controversial issues. The company has ensured its services are user friendly. Customers and employees are treated well with their superiors (Knapp, VandeCreek & Fingerhut, 2017). The company is also aiming at providing better services to all its customers. The company has invested a lot in its customers, technology, and stores to be able to provide better services.

...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

  • Policy and Program Development - Ethics/Leadership
    Description: The goal of corporate social responsibility (CSR) is to make sure that a firm ethically conducts its activities, while also following the legal requirements. The CSR efforts offer the company an opportunity to give back to the immediate community and other stakeholders....
    6 pages/≈1650 words | APA | Management | Essay |
  • Capstone 7 Managing Conflict. Management Assignment
    Description: Workplace conflict is any disagreement among colleagues which may disrupt work flow, hinder teamwork and hurts productivity (De Dreu., et al 2001) Human resource personnel are normally involved in resolving conflicts....
    2 pages/≈550 words | APA | Management | Essay |
  • Self Marketing and Resume Development. Management Essay
    Description: A resume provides employers with prompt insights on an individual's professional. Employers use resumes to determine whether a person is fit for a specific position or not (Campbell, 2010). ...
    4 pages/≈1100 words | APA | Management | Essay |
Need a Plagiarism Free Essay?
Submit your instructions!