Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
2 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Management
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 8.64
Topic:

Assignment 1: Academic Article Cross-Functional Team (CFT)

Essay Instructions:

Assignment Instructions
You will write a two-page article review of a peer-reviewed academic article. The article will pertain to one of the week's learning objectives.
1. This week's lesson objective is Differentiate the strengths and weaknesses of different types of teams in organizations.
2. Explore the theoretical foundations of team management theory in business education, and human services.
Instructions: Select an article that is relevant to this week’s topic. Research, critique and discuss this article in the light of our topic.
Submit this review on a two-page MS Word Document to the assignment section no later than the end of the course week. APA formatting is required. There is an announcement posted on how to write an article review/critique. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Academic Article Review
Your Name
February 9, 2017
Your Institution of Affiliation
In any organization (profit and non-profit) that have ever existed, it is inevitable for its employees to be divided into workgroups, divisions, departments, or simply ‘teams’. This division happens due to the fact that efficiency is most likely to be achieved when tasks are divided and sub-divided to different groups of people rather than having members without a definite function and works simply by being prompted what to do. These days however, the main dilemma is not to whether divide an organization into teams or not, rather the main problem lies in how these people would be divided (in structure and functions), so that every team and member could perform with its maximum efficiency. In line with this, the author of this paper would analyze the paper written by Daspit, et.al (2013), with regards to the effects of a team’s internal factors (cohesion and team environment) in what they called as a Cross-Functional Team (CFT) success.
In the article written by Daspit, et.al (2013), it is apparent that they have utilized the typology of teams, as divided into “functional” and “cross-functional” ones. Basically, functional teams are those which have a definite structure, that is characterized by heirarchical divisions that performs specific functions CITATION App11 \l 1033 (Appelo, 2011). In contrast to this, Cross-functional teams are composed of people who are involved in different departments and bears different types of expertise, but works to achieve the same goal CITATION App11 \l 1033 (Appelo, 2011). In Daspit, et.al’s (2013), work, they have employed undergraduate students from a large Southwestern university in the US, who are taking a capstone project in a business policy course that they are taking. More specifically, the sample size of the students amounted to 142 individuals who were divided into 24 teams. With regards to the functions that they were required to undertake, the teams were given manegerial problems that required a multitude of differe...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to art essays:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!