Greenspan Business Ethics

Short-essay Questions
Name
Institution Affiliation
Short-essay Questions
Q#1
I do trust that Greenspan was very realistic about business ethics possibility. For a firm to realize success, it is essential for the firm to uphold ethical values so that it can be able to attract new customers while maintaining the existing ones. Besides, business ethics helps in establishing healthy work relationships with the employees, creditors, shareholders, and suppliers. This enhances the firm’s public image to stakeholders. Also, business ethics helps in improving firm performance because the relevant stakeholders are motivated in collaborating with the firm. This is because the stakeholders are assured of a fair dealing through integrity and honesty. In his speech, Greenspan says that success satisfaction a firm can obtain is only through engaging in business dealings that are honed and also through strict adherence to the view that for a firm to gain, then clients that the firm deals with should also gain by having a fair dealing.
Most of today’s business people are honest and exercise fair business values. On the other hand, I believe that the small percentage of corrupt business people can taint the truly hard and honest work of America’s businesspeople. In his article, Greensand articulates that in the event a significant percentage of businesspeople violates the trust that is based on the mutual interaction with the customers, the American economy as well as the court system will be sampled into immobility. The core ethical values that I am planning to follow in my career are; integrity, social justice, competence, dignity, achievement which includes doing only what yields positive results, autonomy, where I wish that in my career to receive no or little supervision, creativity or coming up with my own ideal, and challenge that involves completing tasks that are novel or difficult to me, and an influence or having the capacity to affect other people’s ideas and opinions.
Q#2
Judges need to care in the event written plagiarized briefs are submitted by attorneys. This is because, by virtual of the constitution, the attorney is a leader in legal matters. Therefore, the attorney must set an example for others. Plagiarized work is copy-pasted work. Under the legal law, it is illegal for an attorney to submit a plagiarized work unless the attorney has obtained authorization from the actual content writer. Any attorney who is found to have submitted a plagiarized work is regarded to have violated the morals and ethical rules. Plagiarism is regarded as a crime and appropriate measures are against the crime are determined by the judge. Therefore, he or she needs to be arrested and his or her certificate gets invalidated. The attorney must come up with his or her original work to set an example to others. Besides, with original work, people will be able to start emulating the attorney. Also, coming up with original work makes people follow the legal laws that are stipulated by the constitution.
The difference between the two cases is brought about by Lane’s desire to try and cancel his misconduct. Lane tried deceiving the court and decided not to provide answers to the court. I do agree with the r...