Philosophical thinking(conceptual analysis). Life Sciences Essay
greta christina‘s paper
An important aspect of philosophical thinking is the ability to do conceptual analysis. Greta Christina's paper is a great example of this. Throughout her paper, she proposes a definition of sex, discusses how that definition captures several cases that intuitively count as sex, but then discusses some more complicated cases that either show that the definition is too broad (i.e., it includes or counts some case as an instance of sex when intuitively it should not) or too narrow (i.e., it excludes some case from counting as an instance of sex when we intuitively think it should count).
This paper assignment is divided into two parts.
Part one
Expand on one of Greta Christina's several different definitions of sex and explain how that definition is problematic. For example, Christina says, "Perhaps having sex with someone is the conscious, consenting, mutually acknowledged pursuit of shared sexual pleasure." You might explain this definition (or one of the other ones that she considers) by giving a (fictional) example and showing how it exemplifies each of the features listed in the definition. Then, you should explain why that definition is problematic. For example, you could explain how there are cases that we intuitively count (or don't count) as sex but aren't (or are) counted as sex according to the definition (i.e., state whether the definition is too broad or too narrow, or both, and show how).
Option 2 : Propose your own definition — a definition of sex that Christina does not consider. Show how that definition might handle some of the complicated cases that she discusses. Then, clearly state what the shortcomings of your proposed definition might be. For example, you should clearly state how the definition could be too broad or too narrow (or both) by presenting relevant counterexamples.
You should take as a clear example of good writing the last two pages of Christina's essay. Notice how she structures the discussion. She considers a definition. Then she discusses how some cases clearly fit that definition, then some cases that don't (AGAIN either because the definition is too broad, i.e. it includes cases that do not count as sex, or because the definition is too narrow, i.e. the definition excludes cases that do count as sex).
Part two:This part has two options. The first is less challenging than the second, but the second, if done well, can score higher points than the first.Option 1 : Clearly articulate a second definition from Christina that attempts to address some of the problematic aspects of the definition you discussed in part one. Then, as you did in part one, explain how even this second definition could be problematic (Is it too broad? too narrow? both? Show how).
Option 2 : Propose your own definition — a definition of sex that Christina does not consider. Show how that definition might handle some of the complicated cases that she discusses. Then, clearly state what the shortcomings of your proposed definition might be. For example, you should clearly
Part two:
With that in mind, this paper will be graded according to the following rubric:
(10 points) Part One: Clear presentation of definition from Christina. Persuasively shows why definition is unsatisfactory.
(10 points) Part Two: Clear presentation and discussion of a definition of sex that follows up on the definition in part one (either from Christina or your own). In the case that the presentation is another definition from Christina, make sure that the discussion of it is clear and that any problems with it are clearly stated. In the case that you present your own definition, it is important to demonstrate BOTH an understanding of how the proposed definition captures several complications discussed in the reading AND recognizing potential difficulties with the definition.
(2 points) Overall structure: Is the discussion well-ordered and easy to follow?
(1 point) Grammar and spelling: Are there errors in spelling and/or grammar?
(2 points) Style: Is the writing clear and concise (that's good), or is it obscure (that's bad)?
SUBMISSION METHOD:
Choose only ONE of the three submission options:
1) Submit your paper as an attachment in PDF FORM.
2) Submit your paper as an attachment in WORD (doc or docx) FORMAT.
3) Submit your paper by copying and pasting it in the INLINE submission.
FORMATTING:
Papers should be 3 pages double spaced, 1" margins, 12pt font (preferably New Times Roman, but anything that's easy to read is acceptable).
The Definition of Sex
Student Name
Institutional Affiliation
The Definition of Sex
What constitutes having sex is difficult to define since different people have different ideas on what constitutes sex. The phrase “having sex” is slippery and hence to define. There are various activities that people will define as “having sex” and others they will not. Still, other individuals see the definition of “having sex” like a grey area. An understanding of this issue is critical because it changes one’s view of oneself of the relationship with others after sex. There are usually expectations and commitments after a sexual encounter and hence what constitutes sex needs to be plain. In Are We Having Sex Now or What? Greta Christina tries to present her understanding of what counts as sex.
In the article, Christina proposes a definition of “having sex.” Her initial definition of the phrase has something to do with penile-vaginal penetration. In one instance, Christina was upset when her boyfriend David cheated on her. During this time, her friend Gene was trying to get to her and Christina did not discourage him. When she went to Gene’s house, they began getting intimate. However, they never got off their clothes and Gene did not enter her because Christina wanted to remain morally superior to the cheating partner. Since Gene did not penetrate her, Christina initially did not count this as having sex.
However, Christina admits that her definition of “having sex” became broader when she began having relationships with women. Christina’s initial definition of sex as penile-vaginal penetration would not count in this case. Christina admits that “with women, well, first of all, there’s no penis” (5). Hence the initial definition is defective. Women can decide to engage in “touching and licking and grinding and fingering, and fisting” (5). Similarly, an encounter between men and women can take place in the same manner. Dies licking, for example, cease to be sex because there is no penetration? It follows that the initial definition is not sufficient since it excludes some encounters that others may define as “having sex.”
In recognizing the defective definition of sex, Christina goes ahead and presents a more comprehensive definition of “having sex.” She outlines the “having sex” as a “conscious, consenting, mutually acknowledged pursuit of shared sexual pleasure.” This definition is more comprehensive because it captures more aspects that were not included in the penile-vaginal penet...
You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to scientific essays:
- Sexual Values Reflection Paper Biological & Biomedical Sciences Essay4 pages/≈1100 words | APA | Biological & Biomedical Sciences | Essay |
- Students 3-1 & 3-2 post Social Sciences Essay Paper1 page/≈275 words | APA | Social Sciences | Essay |
- Post Comments 4-1 and 4-2 post Social Sciences Essay1 page/≈275 words | APA | Social Sciences | Essay |
- Analysis the argument of two op-ed pieces. Social Sciences Essay3 pages/≈825 words | APA | Social Sciences | Essay |
- Book review for a social work class. Social Sciences Book Review4 pages/≈1100 words | APA | Social Sciences | Book Review |
- Proposal for final paper. Social Sciences Assignment1 page/≈275 words | APA | Social Sciences | Essay |
- Synthesis essay. Nonlinear Policymaking Process. Life Sciences Essay2 pages/≈550 words | 4 Sources | APA | Life Sciences | Essay |