Ethical Dilemmas Law Essay Research Coursework Paper

Ethical Dilemmas
Name
Institution
In pursuing a particular course of action in our workplaces, we are usually faced with different challenges. When specific actions go against our moral values and personal ethics, we are faced with ethical dilemmas. According to Rushworth Kidder, most ethical dilemmas usually fall in the following four categories short term versus long-term, “justice versus mercy,” individual versus community, and truth versus loyalty. In his argument, Kidder tries to explain our conflicting values rather than good moral value versus a lack of weight. Several times in our workplaces, we face situations where our values are torn. The everyday challenges of trying to make decisions between two rights are usually faced with the challenge of an ethical dilemma. At times, we decide to avoid solving dilemmas due to the fear of making the wrong choices. Kidder’s principals guide us in making the right decision when faced with harsh ultimatums. His guidelines entail the process of energetic self-reflection, deep-set core values, and a sense of vision (Kidder, 1995). When followed, this process helps us gather the courage to face difficult situations or make difficult choices when our moral values are tested. There are various ways in which Kidder’s principle can be applied to the Alabama Department of Corrections. Before making any moral decision, there are different guidelines to follow, according to Kidder. First, we should recognize the ethical dilemma, who it belongs to, the relevant facts associated with the dilemma, test for right versus right solution, and apply the resolution principles.
In truth versus loyalty, it involves being honest and telling the truth versus pledging allegiance to a friend or a particular company. As an employee at the Alabama Department of Corrections as a psychologist, there is an obligation to tell the Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program (ADAP) and have a loyalty obligation towards the Alabama Department of Corrections to keep their information confidential. In this situation, the decision made was based on the utilitarianism end-based principle, which argues on the consequences of making any decision (Kidder, 1995). Therefore, it is essential to make decisions that have the most favorable outcomes for the majority. Moreover, considering the most favorable outcome in such situations telling the truth could be more advantageous than loyalty. In describing the truth about the inadequate facilities offered at the Alabama department of corrections could improve the services provided to the inmates, such as the employment of more staff members and the improvement of healthcare facilities. Furthermore, telling the truth will establish a pattern followed by others in trying to fight for justice for the inmates.
In individual versus community, this involves an individual’s interest compared to those of a particular larger group. At times the specific individual could also be involved in the larger group. In individual versus community, it is right as an employee to try and keep our job by not tarnishing the image of the particular company in which we are employed. It is also justifiable to fight for change that cou...