Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
5 pages/≈1375 words
Sources:
2 Sources
Level:
APA
Subject:
Law
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 21.6
Topic:

evidence presentation (Essay Sample)

Instructions:
PLEASE USE ATTACHED COURSE NOTES Assignment Description For this assignment you will need to compare and contrast at least three different techniques of interviewing and interrogation. Based on your analysis of the techniques, you will provide recommendations for the technique that you think would be most effective in a criminal investigation. You will be required to provide references to the weekly readings to substantiate your recommendations. Evaluation This assignment is graded out of 20 possible points. The assignment is worth 10% of your total course grade. Example: Mark of 10/20 = 50% = 5/10 Evaluation Rubric The evaluation of your assignment is based on the following marking rubric. Identification and description of the principle theory of interviewing and interrogation techniques—10 marks - Describes at least three techniques of interviewing and interrogation. Marks will be deducted for incomplete/inaccurate description of a method - Provides examples and/or references that help explain how each technique is applied - Compares all three examples noting pros and cons of each technique (you may use a table or matrix to compare the techniques for conciseness and clarity) - Provides a recommendation for which technique of the three you describe would be most effective in a criminal investigation - Substantiate your opinions/recommendations with references and/or examples from your readings and research source..
Content:
Evidence Presentation [Name] [Institution] [Date] Evidence Presentation How many police investigators are professional interviewers? How many police officers are professional interviewers? Most dishearteningly, many police officers do not know the difference between interrogation and interviewing. They have to be reminded repeatedly that interrogations are carried out with suspects in a crime, and interviewing is done with witnesses. To some extent, police officers might not be liable for their continued ignorance when conducting interviews/ interrogations. This is because they are not taught both psychological and scientific interrogation/interviewing techniques during their training. This branch of psychology has not grown much because only police investigators rely on it. In addition, the branch is normally thought as unnecessary (Vadackumchery, 1999). As a result, any person-John, Tom, Jane- with a police uniform considers themselves, police interviewer or interrogator. Even the constables and the top functionaries act as interviewers/interrogators. This paper explores various techniques of interviewing/interrogation, provides the pros and cons of each technique, and provides a recommendation on which technique is most appropriate in criminal investigation. Normally, the sole purpose of a witness is to record a statement. However, research has revealed that some witnesses face many ordeals in police stations. The courts of law have been noting some queer behaviors regarding contradictions in witness testimonies/statements or unbelievable nature of witness-versions. Even after noting such contradicting behavior with witnesses, no one has proposed any suggestions to improve the situation. Disciplinary actions used to be taken against investigating officers who produced defective witness-statements. These disciplinary actions were initiated against the lower and middle level officials. What the top-level officers did not put into consideration is that the police officers were poorly trained, educated or equipped with the essential skills needed for carrying out professional police witness interviews. Actually, defective interviews will always produce defective witness testimonies. Techniques of interviewing and interrogations For many years, official interview training was rarely carried out in the policing and other investigative communities. Many police investigators adopted the trial and error method to retrieve information from witnesses or suspects. Nowadays, interview training has been recognized not only by the law enforcement agencies but also by many other organizations like human resource, correctional services, and government inspectors. Some of the techniques that can be adopted in conducting interviews and interrogations include Reid Technique, Kinesics Interview and Interrogation technique, and Narrative Technique. 1 Reid Technique John Reid pioneere...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to police brutality:

  • Criminal Justice: Kelling and Wilson
    Description: Criminal Justice Education Essay: Kelling and Wilson...
    2 pages/≈550 words | 3 Sources | APA | Education | Essay |
  • 38 Who Saw Murder Didn't Call the Police
    Description: ENGLISH Creative Writing Essay: 38 Who Saw Murder Didn’t Call the Police...
    1 page/≈275 words | 1 Source | APA | Creative Writing | Essay |
  • why I want to volunteer
    Description: why I want to volunteer Literature and Language Essay...
    2 pages/≈550 words | No Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Essay |
Need a Plagiarism Free Essay?
Submit your instructions!