Essay Available:
Pages:
5 pages/β1375 words
Sources:
40 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Law
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 21.6
Topic:
Evidence of Criminal Offences in Indonesia and Hong Kong
Essay Instructions:
Compare the rules of evidence as they pertain to criminal cases in Indonesia (under the KUHAP) with those in Hong Kong. Please specifically address differences, if any, with the types of admissible evidence (especially electronic evidence); the weight requirement of valid (or objective) evidence along with the requirement of corroborative evidence in Indonesia, and; restrictions on documentary and circumstantial evidence.
*Please do not write introduction/conclusion
* Please use footnotes
Thank you
Essay Sample Content Preview:
Evidence of Criminal Offences in Indonesia and Hong KongNameInstitutional AffiliationDate
Evidence of Criminal Offences in Indonesia and Hong Kong
In Indonesia, a Judge can only impose a legal penalty on a person after two means of legal proof have been presented to the court to proof that the accused is guilty of committing an offense. The legal means of evidence that can be used to proof that the accused is guilty of having committed an offense can come in several ways. They include the testimony of a witness, the evidence of an expert, and presentation of documents before the court, a particular condition that can act as an indicator or through the testimony of the accused.
The testimony of the witness refers to what the witness says at the court during the trial. Testimony from one witness cannot be sufficient enough to proof that the accused is guilty of the act. The provision above does not, however, apply if the evidence of the witness is accompanied by the other means of legal proof. The several testimonies of the other witnesses concerning the particular event can be used as a legal means of proof. It can only happen if the statements are related with one another in such a way that they confirm the occurrence of a specified event that is before the court or they have some circumstances that led to the occurrence of the offense. An opinion that has been derived from thoughts alone cannot be used to constitute as a testimony of the witness. Before issuing a judgment, the judge must evaluate the evidence that has been given by the witness by considering some factors. They must look at the consistency that exists between the testimony that is provided by one of the witnesses and that of the other. They should also consider the consistency of the testimony with the other legal means of proof. The judge must also take into account the way of life or morality so that he can know whether the testimony of the witness before the court can be believed or not CITATION Sim06 \l 1033 (Butt, 2006). The testimony of the witnesses which are not under oath even if they show consistency cannot at all constitute as a legal means of proof. But if the testimony is consistent with that of the witness who is under oath, then it may be used as a legal means of proof by the court.[Law of Criminal Procedure. Law of the Republic of Indonesia.] [Frans, L. (2014, July). An analysis of Criminal Proceedings in Indonesia. Journal of Humanity.]
In Hong Kong, if on cross-examination it is realized that the testimony of the witness is inconsistent with the previous evidence that was made by him that is about the subject matter, then the witness must be brought to the awareness of the statement that he had carried before drawing conclusions about the dishonest by the witness. If they do not acknowledge the statement that they made that is contradictory, then that shows inconsistency CITATION Rom \l 1033 (Rompotis). The court may, therefore, use such evidence in a court of law to determine the ruling that should be given.
Expert testimony can also be used as evidence before the court. It refers to what the expert states at the time of trial. The expert can present the documents before the court under oath as evidence. It can be minutes or documents wh...
Evidence of Criminal Offences in Indonesia and Hong Kong
In Indonesia, a Judge can only impose a legal penalty on a person after two means of legal proof have been presented to the court to proof that the accused is guilty of committing an offense. The legal means of evidence that can be used to proof that the accused is guilty of having committed an offense can come in several ways. They include the testimony of a witness, the evidence of an expert, and presentation of documents before the court, a particular condition that can act as an indicator or through the testimony of the accused.
The testimony of the witness refers to what the witness says at the court during the trial. Testimony from one witness cannot be sufficient enough to proof that the accused is guilty of the act. The provision above does not, however, apply if the evidence of the witness is accompanied by the other means of legal proof. The several testimonies of the other witnesses concerning the particular event can be used as a legal means of proof. It can only happen if the statements are related with one another in such a way that they confirm the occurrence of a specified event that is before the court or they have some circumstances that led to the occurrence of the offense. An opinion that has been derived from thoughts alone cannot be used to constitute as a testimony of the witness. Before issuing a judgment, the judge must evaluate the evidence that has been given by the witness by considering some factors. They must look at the consistency that exists between the testimony that is provided by one of the witnesses and that of the other. They should also consider the consistency of the testimony with the other legal means of proof. The judge must also take into account the way of life or morality so that he can know whether the testimony of the witness before the court can be believed or not CITATION Sim06 \l 1033 (Butt, 2006). The testimony of the witnesses which are not under oath even if they show consistency cannot at all constitute as a legal means of proof. But if the testimony is consistent with that of the witness who is under oath, then it may be used as a legal means of proof by the court.[Law of Criminal Procedure. Law of the Republic of Indonesia.] [Frans, L. (2014, July). An analysis of Criminal Proceedings in Indonesia. Journal of Humanity.]
In Hong Kong, if on cross-examination it is realized that the testimony of the witness is inconsistent with the previous evidence that was made by him that is about the subject matter, then the witness must be brought to the awareness of the statement that he had carried before drawing conclusions about the dishonest by the witness. If they do not acknowledge the statement that they made that is contradictory, then that shows inconsistency CITATION Rom \l 1033 (Rompotis). The court may, therefore, use such evidence in a court of law to determine the ruling that should be given.
Expert testimony can also be used as evidence before the court. It refers to what the expert states at the time of trial. The expert can present the documents before the court under oath as evidence. It can be minutes or documents wh...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
π Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:
- Probation and Punishment5 pages/β1375 words | 3 Sources | APA | Law | Essay |
- Summarize: Vance v. Ball State University5 pages/β1375 words | 3 Sources | APA | Law | Essay |
- Provide Investigative Information Law Enforcement Agencies2 pages/β550 words | 4 Sources | APA | Law | Essay |
- Analysis of The Old Guitarist by Pablo Picasso1 page/β275 words | 1 Source | APA | Law | Essay |
- Technology and Communications3 pages/β825 words | 3 Sources | APA | Law | Essay |
- First Amendment: Which Amendment Effects Corrections Most?2 pages/β550 words | No Sources | APA | Law | Essay |
- National Federation of Independent Business2 pages/β550 words | No Sources | APA | Law | Essay |