The Corruption in Our World Law Essay Research Paper
Assessment Tasks
Participation
This course is being taught in intensive mode. Therefore, attendance each day is considered
mandatory.
Assessment Task 1: Short Paper
Details of task: All students must prepare a short assignment—1000 words—on the following:
Take an example of corruption from the documentary Black Money, shown in class on day 2, and
analyse the example in terms of the TASP framework. (Type, Activity, Sector, Place).
The documentary can be watched / reviewed on-line at:
http://www(dot)pbs(dot)org/wgbh/pages/frontline/blackmoney/view/. This site contains additional information
about the material covered in the documentary.
More information on this is at The Guardian website: http://www(dot)guardian(dot)co(dot)uk/world/bae. This site
includes additional investigative journalism on the activities of the BAE corporation and other British
firms. TASP is described in:
Graycar, Adam, & Sidebottom, Aiden. (2012). Corruption and Control: A Corruption Reduction
Approach. Journal of Financial Crime, 19(4), 384-399. doi: 10.1108/13590791211266377
Graycar, Adam. (2015). Corruption: Classification and analysis. Policy and Society, 34(2), 87-96. doi:
10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.04.001
i will update more information tomorrow nigh
follow the pictures i update, like the rubric and the tasp requirement
Types
Bribery
Extortion
Misappropriation
Self-dealing
Conflict of interest
Abuse of discretion
Patronage
Nepotism
Cronyism
Trading in influence
Pay to play
etc.Activities
• Appointing personnel
• Buying things (procurement)
• Delivering programs or services
• Making things (construction/manufacturing)
• Controlling activities (licencing / regulation / issuing permits)
• Administering (justice for example)
etc.Construction
Health
Tax
administration
Energy
Environment
Water
Forestry
Customs & immigration
Welfare systems
Agriculture
Urban planning
Legal system
etc.• Countries
• Regions
• Localities
• Work placesSectorsPlacesetc.Adapted from Graycar, A. (2015). Corruption: Classification and analysis. Policy and Society, 34(2), 87-96. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.04.001
Syndromes Characteristics ExamplesMature State Corruption Making connections for a fee: • Use of wealth to gain access • Sharing the spoils (contracts, favourable laws) • Within the system & lawful e.g. Campaign financing United States Australia NetherlandsElite Network State Corruption Networks protecting the status quo • Society wide • Political machines (e.g. Tammany Hall) • Competition locked out Italy South Korea ChileWeak Transitional States Corruption Competition among elites for power & resources • Weak / ineffectual state mechanisms of control • Logic of corruption - understood by society but not outsiders • Violence common in society Russia Mexico PhilippinesWeak Undemocratic States Corruption Little of no societal protection against corruption • Kleptocracy (rule of thieves) • Patronage and intimidation prevail • Enrichment of family and friends result Suharto’s Indonesia Afghanistan China Kenya
Source: adapted from Michael Johnston. 2005. Syndromes of Corruption: Wealth. Power and democracy Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Assessment RubricRubric - Assessment 1 - Short paper Excellent: HD 80% + Very Good: D 70-79% Good C 60-69% Fair P 50-59% Fail 0-49%Understanding of text Paper demonstrates detailed understanding of TASP, and includes insightful reflections drawing from other course material and from outside the course Paper demonstrates sound understanding of TASP and connects to other material in the course Paper demonstrates adequate understanding of TASP, but makes no further connections Paper demonstrates limited engagement with TASP -superficial response Paper does not engage with the TASPEvidence Paper consistently uses insightful evidence from the readings (quotes and page refs) & video to support the point Paper includes some appropriate evidence from the readings (quotes and page refs) & video to support the point Paper uses little or weak evidence from the readings (specific examples) & video, or fails to reference examples Paper consists of general comments on the text & video unsupported by specific examples or fails to reference examples Paper does not reference relevant evidenceResponse to Question (Relevance) Paper is consistently relevant to the question and makes insightful connections to other material in the course Paper makes some connections to other material in the class Paper is mostly relevant to the question, but responses are basic Paper has little relevance and deviates from the topic Paper has no relevance to the topicInitiative Paper extends the discussion and introduces new ideas or approaches Paper keeps discussion moving Paper mostly follows established themes and ideas Paper shows little initiative and repeat earlier ideas Paper shows no initiativeWritten expression Paper is exceptionally clear and concise Paper is mostly clear and concise Paper is mostly clear but disorganized or wordy, and/or has errors Paper is confusing or off topic, and/or has grammatical or other errors. Paper is significantly over/under the word limit
Corruption in Our World
Student’s Name
Institution
Corruption in Our World
One of the key ills affecting society today is corruption. According to Graycar and Sidebottom (2012), corruption costs about 5% of the global gross domestic product (GDP). In another article, Graycar (2015) points out that the vice not only demoralizes governments but it also dwindles policy formulation and implementation efforts. This paper uses the TASP (Type, Activity, Sector, Place) Framework as explained by Graycar (2015) to analyze the corruption involving BAE Systems, the UK government, and key figures in the Saudi government.
A PBS documentary, Black Money, exposes the corrupt dealings of British-based BAE, the UK government, and Saudi Arabia (PBS, 2009). From the Saudi Arabia’s end, the major players in the corruption event are Prince Bandar, Prince Turki bin Nasser, as well as other Saudi officials belonging to Saudi royal family. As depicted in the PBS video, the deal, known as Al Yamamah, was signed by Margaret Thatcher on behalf of the UK government and Prince Bandar’s father on behalf of the Saudi Government. As a subcontractor, BAE was to deliver fighter jets to Saudi Arabia, and the company was to be paid in form of oil. While the details of the contract were kept a secret, Thatcher revealed that the deal would result in thousands of jobs and bring a lot of wealth for Britain. The secrecy of the contract, however, raised suspicion of bribery. The documentary reveals how BAE engaged in corruption by paying for expenses of the members of the Saudi Government as well as directly depositing billions of dollars in their accounts. This type of corruption can be said to be a mature state corruption given the actors and the use of wealth by BAE to gain access. According to Graycar (2015), mature state corruption "results in the sharing spoils such as contracts, mining, energy, or other natural resources…” (p.88). The Al Yamamah deal clearly allows BAE and Saudi officials to share spoils. The paragraphs below analyze the case in terms of the TASP Framework.
The TASP framework can be used to understand deeply the corruption by BAE Systems, the UK government, and the Saudi Arabian government. The first element of the framework is type. According to Graycar (2015), corruption encompasses many types of behaviors. In the BAE case, the type of corruption is bribery. The PBS video exposes a series of bribery incidences, where BAE systems paid Saudi officials in different forms, as a way of enforcing the secret contract. Bribery is evident in the BAE case when the company paid for the expenses of Saudi Prince Bin Nasser. As depicted in the case, the lifestyle of the Saudi prince significantly improved after the deal. All of a sudden the prince could afford to build a mansion in Beverly Hills, aircraft, and even a yacht. Furthermore, the bi...
π Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:
- Contemporary Issues in Modern Police Operations and the Policing5 pages/β1375 words | 3 Sources | APA | Law | Essay |
- Police1 page/β275 words | 1 Source | APA | Law | Essay |
- Elements of a Negligent Tort2 pages/β550 words | 4 Sources | APA | Law | Essay |
- Punishment SOSC/CRIM 3656,Punishment in contemporary Canadian society4 pages/β1100 words | APA | Law | Essay |
- Criminal Behavior. How stable is criminal behavior?1 page/β275 words | 6 Sources | APA | Law | Essay |
- Describe Why Enter The Field Of Probation Officer (PO)?3 pages/β825 words | 4 Sources | APA | Law | Essay |
- Legal Issues in Cyberspace4 pages/β1100 words | 3 Sources | APA | Law | Essay |