Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
5 pages/≈1375 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
IT & Computer Science
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 27
Topic:

Real or Unreal Friends? Online/Offline Friendships Essay

Essay Instructions:

Essay 2
You will be uploading your work to Blackboard so that your instructor can have it checked against web pages and databases of existing papers using SafeAssign. Your paper will then automatically become part of the local Trent database for future use.
Topics
Write a 5-6 page, MAX 1500 words (12 pt font, double-spaced) paper
Is it possible for internet friends to be real? Cocking and Matthew argue for why it is impossible to have a close friendship over the internet. Briggle disagrees. Explain their reasons in your words. Who, if either, is right and why?
Value
This essay is worth 25% of course grade.
Learning outcome
To learn how to write clearly and succinctly
To think critically about arguments.
To be able to articulate your own arguments and ideas.
Submission Guidelines
You must use proper citation, but feel free to use whatever citation system you feel most comfortable with. (I realize that the APA guidelines suggest not putting page numbers if you're not quoting directly, but I would like you to include page references nonetheless.)
Name your document as follows: Lastname_Firstname
Submit your paper in Word (.doc or .docx) format or PDF format.
Include a word count on the front.
Check the grading rubric.
You do not need to consult any secondary sources.
You can use 'I' in your paper.
NOTE: For every 100 words over the word limit, your essay grade will suffer a penalty of 5%. (1599 words means no penalty. 1600 words means 5% penalty.) Bibliography does not count.
Deadline
See syllabus for due dates.
Any assignment submitted after this time and date will be considered late, and assigned a penalty of 1% per calendar day.
Assignments will not be accepted more than one week after the due date. That is, essays submitted more than one week after the due date will be given a grade of zero.
Grading
Because the class is so large, it is impossible to provide in-depth comments for all the papers in a timely fashion.
Instead, a grading rubric will be used to assess your paper. The grading rubric is available at the bottom of this page.
You will have an opportunity to discuss your paper with me or the other faculty member grading your paper.
Also, use the grading rubric to guide the writing of your own paper.

 

Essay 2
You will be uploading your work to Blackboard so that your instructor can have it checked against web pages and databases of existing papers using SafeAssign. Your paper will then automatically become part of the local Trent database for future use.
TopicsValue
This essay is worth 25% of course grade.
Learning outcome
• To learn how to write clearly and succinctly
• To think critically about arguments.
• To be able to articulate your own arguments and ideas.
Submission Guidelines
• You must use proper citation, but feel free to use whatever citation system you feel most comfortable with. (I realize that the APA guidelines suggest not putting page numbers if you're not quoting directly, but I would like you to include page references nonetheless.)
• Name your document as follows: Lastname_Firstname
• Submit your paper in Word ( doc or .docx) format or PDF format.
• Include a word count on the front.
• Check the grading rubric.
• You do not need to consult any secondary sources.
• You can use T in your paper.
• NOTE: For every 100 words over the word limit, your essay grade will suffer a penalty of 5%. (1599 words means no penalty. 1600 words means 5% penalty.) Bibliography does not count.
Deadline
• See syllabus for due dates.
• Any assignment submitted after this time and date will be considered late, and assigned a penalty of 1% per calendar day.
• Assignments will not be accepted more than one week after the due date. That is, essays submitted more than one week after the due date will be given a grade of zero.
Grading
• Because the class is so large, it is impossible to provide in-depth comments for all the papers in a timely fashion.
• Instead, a grading rubric will be used to assess your paper. The grading rubric is available at the bottom of this page.
• You will have an opportunity to discuss your paper with me or the other faculty member grading your paper.
• Also, use the grading rubric to guide the writing of your own paper.

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Real or Unreal Friends? Online/Offline Friendships
Name:
Institutional Affiliation:
Date:
Real or Unreal Friends? Online/Offline Friendships
Living in a world where the line between virtual and non-virtual is non-existent, it is appropriate to evaluate the feasibility of achieving real online friendships. The evaluation of the realness of friendship is based on contextual communication as viewed from the interpretation of what, why, and how people engage in conversations. Gauging the realness of a friendship depends on various aspects like the sincerity of disclosure and vulnerability of the friends. It is along these lines that people base the nurturing of friendships to improve their nature and value. Social and structural barriers affect the extent of disclosure and hence truth questioning the viability of the relationships formed under the contexts within which they exist. Based on the tenets of sincerity, extent of disclosure and vulnerability, online/offline contexts are a just medium as the nature and value of friendship depends on the efforts and dedication of the friends. Thus, online friendships can be just as genuine as non-virtual relationships provided the partners are committed to its furtherance.
Cocking and Mathews’ (2000, pp. 225-226) main reasoning for the infeasibility of internet friendships is that the medium consists of structural constraints leading to predisposed behavioral curtailing to suit a particular environment. This tuning of communication availed by the Internet distorts the true nature of self in the effort to fit the context thus limiting the development of true friendship. The basis of the structural barriers set by Internet communication, according to the duo, (p. 27) is facilitating personal relations solely on voluntary disclosure of self-traits hence obscuring the aspects transferred through involuntary disclosure. In tackling the ‘barriers’, Briggle (2008) argues that no deterministic structural barriers are holding any value as to limit the interpretation, self-realization and mutual identity formation posited by Cocking and Mathews (p. 73). Elaborating on the existence of barriers, Briggle (pp. 73-74) highlighted the relational and social structures that equally bind offline communications. The structures operate within the expectations of status, norms, and conventions that also distort the version of 'myself' that a person exhibits. The limitations cited by Cocking and Mathews as only present in Internet relationships also manifest in the non-virtual world in the realities that, voluntarily or involuntarily, people are wary of exposing. According to Briggle (pp.74-75), the barriers are not static but vary from one social convention to another each requiring a renegotiation of a neutral self for flexibility and appropriation across the avenues.
The central focus of both papers, in regards to the barriers, was that they lead to the dominance of voluntary disclosure thus affecting the level sharing, relationally, aspects about us that form true definitions of friendship. Cocking and Mathew (p. 230) defined involuntary relations as the aspects that a communicator is aware of but chooses to withhold their exposure and those incapable of revealing but the partn...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now