Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
4 pages/β‰ˆ1100 words
Sources:
2 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 19.44
Topic:

Critique of Research Studies: Statement of the Problem

Essay Instructions:


Apply Rubrics
Critique of Research Studies - Part 1

1
Not submitted
0.00%
2
Unsatisfactory
75.00%
3
Less Than Satisfactory
80.00%
4
Satisfactory
88.00%
5
Good
92.00%
6
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content

7.0 %Quantitative Title and Abstract
None
Critique is missing for quantitative research title and abstract.
Critique incompletely or incorrectly addresses guidelines and criteria for a quantitative research title and abstract. Critique is not supported with relevant evidence.
Critique addresses some guidelines and criteria for a quantitative research title and abstract. Parts of the critique are supported with relevant evidence.
Critique thoroughly addresses most guidelines and criteria for a quantitative research title and abstract. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for the quantitative research title and abstract. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
28.0 %Quantitative Introduction: Statement of the problem, hypotheses or research questions, literature review, and conceptual framework/theoretical framework
None
Critique is missing for all quantitative introduction components.
Critique is vague and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative research introduction components OR the critique is thorough but is missing three components. Critique is unsupported with evidence.
Critique is brief and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative research introduction components OR the critique is thorough but is missing two components. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.
Critique is detailed and addresses most guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative research introduction components OR the critique is thorough but is missing a component. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative research introduction components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
7.0 %Qualitative Title and Abstract
None
Critique is missing for qualitative research title and abstract.
Critique incompletely or incorrectly addresses guidelines and criteria for a qualitative research title and abstract. Critique is not supported with relevant evidence.
Critique addresses some guidelines and criteria for a qualitative research title and abstract. Parts of the critique are supported with relevant evidence.
Critique thoroughly addresses most guidelines and criteria for a qualitative research title and abstract. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for the qualitative research title and abstract. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
28.0 %Qualitative Introduction: Statement of the problem, research questions, literature review, and conceptual underpinnings
None
Critique is missing for all qualitative introduction components.
Critique is vague and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative research introduction components OR the critique is thorough but is missing three components. Critique is unsupported with evidence
Critique is brief and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative research introduction components OR the critique is thorough but is missing two components. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.
Critique is detailed and addresses most guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative research introduction components OR the critique is thorough but is missing a component. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative research introduction components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

20.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
None
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech.
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English.
10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
None
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)
None
No reference page is included. No citations are used.
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style is usually correct.
In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage
Follow the instructions provided in "Critique of Research Studies Instructions."
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
NUR504.Critique of Research Studies Instructions_Student_1-09-14.docx

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Critique of Research Studies
Name
Institution of affiliation
Date
Critique of Research Studies
Quantitative
The role of nurses in the recognition and treatment of patients with sepsis in the emergency department: A prospective before-and-after intervention study
The title is good noting that it recognizes the key phenomenon under study as the role of nurses in the specified medical condition. It also specified that the study looks at the situation before and after the study.
Abstract
The abstract clearly and concisely summarizes the key components of the study. It correctly provides the background context leading to the study. Noting that there has been a global initiative to decrease mortality owing from Sepsis. This initiative, however, does not include the role of the nurse. The abstract also provides objectives for the study. It also notes that participants are patients (adults above 16 years) coming to 825 patients. It notes that the study methods includes measuring compliance with Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) recommendations. It notes that the intervention mechanisms led to an improvement from 3.5% to 12.4%.
Introduction
The introduction correctly and unambiguously identifies the problem. The introduction notes that 2% of all patients who are hospitalized are septic patients. The paper correctly identifies the medical intervention mechanism for treating Sepsis. The introduction also provides the background for the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) which was to reduce the mortality rate for Sepsis.
Statement of the problem
The problem statement notes the limitation of the current Sepsis management protocol through the 6h and 24h bundles. The statement recognizes that nurses are not involved in this protocol. Thus, the statement advocates for a program that includes nurses in implementing SSC recommendations.
The problem is significant for nursing noting that with a 40-50% fatality rate for severe sepsis cases. Yet, sepsis makes up 2% of all hospitalized patients, the number of at-risk patients is significant.
The match between the research problem and the method was good. Utilizing a quantitative method paradigm was sound noting that the study is interested in reducing the fatality rate of Sepsis. This method is the only paradigm capable of determining that protocols are working.
Hypotheses or research questions / Literature review
Research questions are not explicitly stated in the study. The hypothesis is alluded to where the role of nurses in the management of Sepsis will result in an increase in the quality of care for Sepsis patients.
The literature review study is severely lacking in content. There is minimal reference to previous studies. Where previous studies are quoted, this is merely done in passing. E.g. the paper notes that past studies describe how implementation activities of the SSC recommendations can affect diagnosis. It does not, therefore, provide the theoretical foundations for the study.
Conceptual/theoretical framework
The conceptual framework for the study is not clearly stated. It can only be inferred from reading the study.
Method
The study was humane, with the procedures of the study designed to protect the innate rights of the patients an...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now