Critical Evaluation of Belbin Profile
See the example paper-
You will need to critically evaluate your profile based on your input and the input of 4 observers of your choice. (see the attached report from myself and 4 observers from my team) - I am a medical officer, while 4 observers are my team manager, and 2 doctors and 1 nurse.
By critically evaluate we mean see if the profile contributes to reality. Consider why your observers scored you in a certain way and reflect on your strengths and weaknesses (when did your skills work with you or against you when working in a team – you can give brief examples - explames from working in medical team).
You may wish to consider reflecting on 2 strong roles and 2 weak roles for example and consider how they contributed (or not) to team working whilst linking it with current literature. You can also think of how your leadership attributes apply to public health leadership. **Refer to the belbin report too!
For this assignment you have to complete:
1. Personal Belbin Profile (done and attached) - you can see from the example- copy and quote some useful data from the belbin report for your reflection
2. A critical evaluation of your personal profile in relation to your contribution to team working and application of these skills to public health leadership
The word limit is 1000 words exclusive of the reference list and appendices. - make sure references are needed. and refer to the report for all the reflection. the case / the examples use for reflection can be make it up by yourself but must be based on working environment in hospital with teams.
MARKING CRITERIA FOR CRITICAL REFLECTION ON BELBIN PROFILE
Module Code: 7WLM 0020 Candidate: Marker: Date:
|
Grade |
Reflective Evaluation of the attributes of the Personal Belbin Profile |
Critical Application of Belbin profile to job demands |
Personal Contribution to team working in practice |
Consideration of Skills needed for Public Health Leadership |
|
|
|
Weighting 5% |
Weighting 10% |
Weighting 5% |
Weighting 5% |
|
COMPETENT |
80-100
Outstanding |
Outstanding definition and understanding of personal attributes as defined in the Belbin profile Outstanding range of reference source s applied. |
Outstanding critical evaluation demonstrating outstanding understanding of context and team issues. Outstanding breadth and depth of references. Outstanding integration of literature into work. |
Outstanding critical understanding of personal contribution to team working. Outstanding breadth and depth of references. Outstanding integration of literature into work. |
Outstanding consideration of public health leadership skills demonstrated. Outstanding breadth &depth of literature utilised. Outstanding integration of literature into work.
|
|
70-79
Excellent |
Excellent definition and understanding of personal attributes as defined in the Belbin profile. Excellent range of reference sources. |
Excellent critical evaluation demonstrating excellent understanding of context and team issues. Excellent breadth and depth of references. Excellent integration of literature into work. |
Excellent critical understanding of personal contribution to team working. Excellent breadth & depth of literature utilised. Excellent integration of literature into work. |
Excellent consideration of public health leadership skills demonstrated Excellent breadth & depth of literature utilised. Excellent integration of literature into work. |
||
60-69
Very Good |
Very good definition and understanding of personal attributes as defined in the Belbin profile. Very good range of reference sources. |
Very good critical evaluation demonstrating very good understanding of context and team issues. Very good breadth and depth of references. Very good integration of literature into work. |
Very good critical understanding of personal contribution to team working. Very good breadth & depth of literature utilised. Literature integrated into work very well.
|
Very good consideration of public health leadership skills demonstrated. Very good breadth & depth of literature utilised. Literature integrated into work very well.
|
||
50-59
Good/Satisfactory Minimum expected competency |
Good to satisfactory definition and understanding personal attributes as defined in the Belbin profile. Good to satisfactory range of reference sources. |
Good to satisfactory critical evaluation demonstrating good to satisfactory understanding of context and team issues. Good to satisfactory breadth and depth of references. Good to satisfactory integration of literature into work. |
Good to satisfactory critical understanding of personal contribution to team working. Depth appropriate to topic but moderate breadth or vice versa. Good to satisfactory integration of literature into the work.
|
Good to satisfactory consideration of public health leadership skills demonstrated Depth appropriate to topic but moderate breadth or vice versa. Good to satisfactory integration of literature into the work.
|
||
LACKS COMPETENCE |
40-49
Marginal Fail |
Poorly worded definition and limited understanding of personal attributes as defined in the Belbin profile Poor range of reference sources. |
Limited degree of critical evaluation demonstrating
limited understanding of context and team issues. Limited breadth and depth of references. Limited degree of integration of literature into work. |
Limited critical understanding of personal contribution to team working. Limited degree of integration of literature into work. |
Limited consideration of public health leadership skills demonstrated Limited breadth and depth of literature utilised. Limited degree of integration of literature into work. |
|
20-39
Clear Fail
|
Very poorly worded definition and very limited understanding of personal attributes as defined in the Belbin profile. Very poor range of reference sources.
|
Lacking detail in critical evaluation demonstrating an inadequate understanding of the context and team issues. Inadequate breadth and depth of references. Inadequate degree of integration of literature into work. |
Poor critical understanding of personal contribution to team working. Lacks breadth & depth of literature. Some literature irrelevant to topic area.
|
Poor consideration of public health leadership skills demonstrated Lacks breadth & depth of literature. Some literature irrelevant to topic area.
|
||
1-19 Nothing of merit |
Little or nothing of merit. Incomplete definition. No understanding and confusion personal attributes as defined in the Belbin profile. No references |
Little or nothing of merit. No critical demonstration and no understanding of the context and team issues Only descriptive account provided. No references. |
Little or nothing of merit. No understanding of personal contribution to team working. demonstrated. No references.
|
Little or nothing of merit. No consideration of public health leadership skills demonstrated. No references.
|
||
|
Section Marks |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Mark:
|
|
|||||
Comments (focussing on areas for improvement):
|
Critical Evaluation of the Belbin Profile
Your Name
Subject and Section
Professor’s Name
Date of Submission
Introduction
Team members in a group are often guided by the personality stereotypes. Individuality helps in accomplishing the work by honing one’s aptitude and skills. However, this also posed a risk of promoting fragmented responsibilities and fragmented communication (Belbin, 2012).
To have a better understanding of individual roles, we are required to complete the Belbin Team Report. I asked a total of four observers: my team manager, two other doctors, and a nurse. The report reflects the perspectives of individual group members.
Reflection and Critical Application of Belbin
6515102881630Figure SEQ Figure \* ARABIC 1. Self-Perception Plus Four Observer AssessmentsFigure SEQ Figure \* ARABIC 1. Self-Perception Plus Four Observer Assessments651979944200
Observers’ Perspective
The graph shows how the team members and I perceive my leadership in the group. Currently, I work as a medical officer in a local government setting.
As you can see, the majority of team members perceive my role as an implementer and team worker. My practice requires excellent communication and coordination skills to help the public health officers devise programs that will aid the communities to alleviate their health situation. The most significant role is to develop a health plan based on a community health investigation (Rechel, 2018).
Implementers are hard workers who promote a systematic approach without compromising efficiency. This makes one inflexible to situations (Belbin, 2012). My colleagues considered me as an implementer which aligns with my work for it requires great leadership to execute a variety of public health programs. However, the downside on this is that physicians should be flexible especially in unexpected situations like medical emergencies or public health crises.
Others also considered me as a team worker. As mentioned by Karabeleski & Avdic (2018), this individual team player, which specifies that I have cooperative and listening skills. Moreover, the individual is most likely amiable and tends to avoid conflicts to prevent aversions in the workplace. The medical team is multidisciplinary and to have an outstanding result, the members must practice a give-and-take method where they express their perspectives on a medical case and listen to the perspectives of the others. By doing this, every member shall be treated equally and no one will hold autonomy. This shall give a better room for alternative solutions for a specific problem.
Often, my role as a medical officer allows me to encourage team members to achieve a common goal. This requires a single-minded intervention and resolve to execute a project cleanly and smoothly. My contribution is to aid all the members in executing the project, bring and keep them together, and to project objectives that can be evaluated. Hence, this role will guide me in achieving the primary objectives of the team.
Fundamental Public Health Leadership Skills
The vital skills of a physician involve active communication, critical thinking, and interpersonal skills. The central skill among these is an excellent communication ...
👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:
- Limited Scope of Practice of Nurse Practitioners in California4 pages/≈1100 words | 5 Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Essay |
- Discussion: Importance of Nurse Legislator’s Role in Advocacy2 pages/≈550 words | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Essay |
- wk-5-res-2 Health, Medicine, Nursing Essay Research1 page/≈275 words | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Essay |
- Response: Patients With Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) Should Not Receive CPR.1 page/≈275 words | 2 Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Essay |
- Scholarly Activities: New Horizon of Treasure Coast Race2 pages/≈550 words | 2 Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Essay |
- Assessment Practices in Evaluating Students Learning in an Educational Healthcare Setting4 pages/≈1100 words | 3 Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Essay |
- HCM 415 4-1 Final Project Milestone Three: SWOT Analysis2 pages/≈550 words | 2 Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Essay |