5 pages/≈1375 words
Group Counseling (Essay Sample)
This assignment requires you to observe a group, reflect on group process and dynamics, and write an analysis of your observation and reflections. The difference is that this time you will be observing, reflecting upon, and writing an analysis of group formation, development, process, and termination for a non-counseling group that you observe on film. View the film Twelve Angry Men in either their original or remade version and provide an analysis of the group dynamics in the film. In a well-written, APA style paper not to exceed 7 pages, excluding cover page, address the roles of the individuals in the group, note any coalitions and subgroups, and how the group changed over time. In other words, you will document and analyze the development of the group. Similar to the last assignment, describe not only what happened, but your understanding, grounded in your knowledge base, of how and why those things happened. Describe the group (and its process) as a whole. Pay attention to how the group changes over time. Questions you might ask yourself include: - What type of group did you observe? Who was in the group? Where, how, and why did the group form? What was the purpose(s) of the group? - What challenges, critical events, and disclosures moved the group through each stage? How did the group end? - What roles did each of the members play? Who led the group? Did that change over time? If so, in what ways? Scoring Rubric Demonstration of knowledge and awareness of group process and dynamics 10 points Knowledge and awareness are grounded in group theory and research 5 points APA format, including professional writing 5 points source..
Title: Group counseling
Name of institution:
Word count: 1521
The film, 12 Angry Men, by Rose and Lumet (1957) is an American drama filmed in 1957 and it tells of a story of a twelve man-jury. The group is discussing on whether a defendant is guilty or should be acquitted on the basis of reasonable doubt. The movie is set almost entirely in a courtroom with only three minutes of the 96 minutes movie being set at the steps of the court room and in the washroom as noted by Russ (2000). Given that in United States, jury`s verdict in criminal cases must be unanimous to either acquit or convict the defendant, the films demonstrates techniques that can be used in the process of building consensus as observed by Russ (2000). He further points out that building of consensus is a complex affair since members of the jury have different personalities.
The group of the 12 men is formed and that is tasked with responsibility of determining the verdict to be given in a case of a slum boy who is accused of stabbing his father to death. After the judge listens to the closing arguments in the cases, he instructs the 12 men jury to determine whether the boy was guilty of murdering his father reminding them that if their verdict will be that the boy is guilty, he will be sentenced to death as seen in film by Rose and Lumet (1957).
The twelve get down to work in a private room but apparently all the jurors except juror number 8 have already made up their mind that the boy is guilty from the onset and they thus wish to deliver their verdict as soon as possible without much deliberation. During the preliminary vote, Davis who is juror 8 votes in favor of the acquittal arguing that the boy is not guilty and further pointing that the case has serious repercussion on the boy. He feels that the evidence presented against the boy leaves reasonable doubt since the weapon used in the murder is a common pocketknife which he presented an identical one and at the time of the alleged murder, a train was passing at the scene. He therefore tried to convince the group to have a discussion before giving a verdict. Juror Number 7, a sales man is angered by his colleague`s vote given that he has tickets a baseball game that evening and prolonged discussion will ruin his evening as seen in the film by Rose and Lumet (1957).
The other jurors in the film have different characters with juror number one, who is also the head of the group, is preoccupied with his personal commitments but is accommodative to the others probably in an attempt to hasten the process of getting a consensus to enable him continue with his duties as a high school assistant football coach as constructed Rose and Lumet (1957). During the ninth round of voting he gets convinced that the boy is not guilty and votes for his acquittal. Juror number 2 is a humble bank clerk who during the initial stages of the deliberation is overshadowed by others members of the jury but gathers courage fast as the discussion progresses. He votes that the boy is not guilty during the third round as observed in the film by Rose and Lumet (1957). Juror 3 is a stubborn business man and a worried father. He is high tempered and is portrayed as the antagonist in the case as portrayed by Rose and Lumet (1957) probabl...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to a rose for emily:
- Fences. Gabriel MaxsonDescription: Literature and Language Essay: Fences. Gabriel Maxson...4 pages/≈1100 words | 1 Source | MLA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- Childhood ObisetyDescription: Undergraduate writing level 8 pages Literature and Language Format Style English (U.S.) Essay. Childhood Obisety...8 pages/≈2200 words | 10 Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- Kate ChopinDescription: High School writing level 2 pages Literature and Language Format Style English (U.S.) Annotated Bibliography. Kate Chopin...2 pages/≈550 words | 15 Sources | MLA | Literature & Language | Annotated Bibliography |