Decision alternatives on Chemical disposal

Decision alternatives on Chemical disposal
Name:
Instructor:
The professional code of conduct requires that individuals should exercise due diligence in their work. Inspection of chemical disposal is a vital role that helps to minimize incidences of negligence, or accidents. Thus, regulations in the form of laws are there to ensure that people follow the guidelines in handling chemicals in order to ensure that the public is adequately protected. Inspectors ought to adhere to the set guidelines without fear or favor, the scenario of the leaking drums presents a challenge on what to consider between public safety and profit motive. Thus, there is a need to look into the pros and cons of the available options.
The first option is to tell Dan that I will report him to his superior; this strategy may be effective as Dan is unlikely to continue handling the toxic chemicals. In case of a lawsuit, my defense would be that I took all necessary steps to avoid breaking the law and there is no negligence on my part. However, this strategy may back fire if the management agrees with Dan’s position they may intimidate all who are against the decision.
Informing Dan that I will not interfere with the plan, but will also not help him is another option available. This strategy is effective if proved that Dan did this without consultation, but he clearly knew it was wrong. Therefore one can say that Dan is solely responsible for any possible leakage is on the site. Inspectors ought to ensure public safety at all times, this option may be interpreted to be negligence on and a ...