1 page/≈275 words
Garner Et Al (Essay Sample)
Write an organized response to Garner et al.'s "Common Use of PowerPoint versus the Assertion-Evidence Structure." In your response, state the reading, the author(s)' argument, and the main points. Discuss what lessons you draw from the reading, why you think it is important and how it relates the subject matter of the course or other course concepts.Show All
Your assertions about the reading should be properly supported by evidence from the reading. For example, if you think the argument is x, then explain what brought you to that conclusion. If I can see why you think something (i.e., if you provide me evidence of your thought process), even if you are incorrect about the reading, the critical thinking is what is important, but I can only see it if you support your points.
Only use quotations from the reading when absolutely necessary to support your claims. Refrain from excessive quotations. Summarize the material in your own words.
Be sure to review the rubric.
Content: I am assessing your critical thinking skills, your ability to recognize and explain an argument and main points in relation to the readings, and your ability to connect the readings to larger contexts (e.g., your own work or career goals or social issues). Responses should demonstrate a critical engagement with the reading by grappling with the ideas and concepts. Your responses should be in your own words and not rely heavily on quotations. If quotations are absolutely necessary, they must be explicated and explained.
Your assertions about the reading should be properly supported by evidence from the reading. For example, if you think the argument is x, then explain what in the reading brought you to that conclusion.
Organization: Responses should have a clear and logical hierarchy of information or presentation of ideas.
Style and Diction: Responses should follow a clear and concise style. Appropriate diction.
Grammar and mechanics: Responses should be free of punctuation, grammatical, and spelling errors.
Garner et al.'s "Common Use of PowerPoint versus the Assertion-Evidence Structure
Garner et al (2009), sought to establish whether the assertion-evidence structure of the slide design enabled the audience to recall information compared to the PowerPoint slides. Through presenting the same information using the two different approaches it was easier to compare results. The assertion- evidence approach captures the assertion headline and visual evidence to explain the information compared to the bullet list in the other approach. The differences in slide design show that the presentation of information often results in different impressions influencing how the audience understand and recall information. Integrating visual evidence was more effective supporting the authors’ view that multimedia approaches to learning were beneficial.
The need for presenters to utilize the most effective slide styles is necessary as the audience also rely on visual cues to understand and recall information. However, the authors fail to acknow...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
- Salvo et al: A Case of Exhaustive DocumentationDescription: Salvo et al., (2007) in “A case of exhaustive documentation: Re-centering system-oriented organizations around user need” point out that Braun Corporation had developed a strong independence ...1 page/≈275 words | No Sources | APA | Creative Writing | Essay |
- Principal Components of StrategyDescription: SEF is a strong management model that facilitates projects and planned programs for an organization in order to ensure critical initiative and achievement of the objected goals...1 page/≈275 words | 3 Sources | APA | Creative Writing | Essay |
- Companies with a ConscienceDescription: The topic of Ethics continues to increase as an issue of central importance to strategic planning...1 page/≈275 words | 3 Sources | APA | Creative Writing | Essay |